Scheevel

↳ bmad-master
commit all changes, this is for @ 10.4.3 tag as "known good check point"

↳ deployer
*smart-deploy-web @ 9.6 @ 10.4.1 @10.4.3 Ask any clarifying questions and challenge assumptions 
-
Run *analyze-web first to check the current configuration and secret status. Let me know if any questions remain.
-
First, list the commands that prompted user approval and make them available from this session for use in future sessions.
-

Scheevel

↳ bmad-master
Archive @ 2.9
Archive @ 10.3
Archive @ 10.3.1
Archive all 11.1 through 11.4 stories.
Also, archive collateral that may exist in `/architecture` or `/mockups` or `/qa` or `/stories`
1. Review git changes for this and all these related documents (git diff, git status)
2. Update @docs/completed-epics.md:
   - If this is the first story for a new epic, add the epic section
   - Add this story to the epic's "Stories Completed" list

Scheevel

↳ architect
@ project-scoped-ocr is an older story, api end points and route names may have changed. "Current Architecture Context" needs to be re-evaluated as do all the other sections. However your design captures the user behavior we are seeking.
-
what is the logical epic & story number for this spec?
- 
agree, Use Story 10.4 and renumber the PRD's future stories, 

↳ ux
Can you display for me a static .html mockup of how this @docs/architecture/ spec will appear rendered in the browser? 

Scheevel

↳ analyst
*research-prompt In the context of this project, I am not selecting good examples for back testing. Honestly validate my reasoning and propose to me a solution for finding stock that are most likely to have a high occurrence of the strategy we are seeking. Currently I am filtering using finviz.com screener (not required, just the tool I chose) and I am screening for: Beta > 4 , Avg Vol > 2M,  hight Market Cap.
-
Option #3 First discuss alternative screening criteria before research. I'm interested in what you think.
-
Option #1 Build research prompt to validate these screening criteria. And, finviz, and doing this by hand is clunky. If there is an API or some other datasource that we could leverage, that would make life easier.
-
option #2 Save this to a file in the project docs/research/universe-selection-prompt.md

↳ analyst

Scheevel

↳ architect
So, for the first result, somewhere in the database is the name of the image file and the coordinates to the point on the image where that OCR value was discovered, right?
-
Yes, can you fill in the values for deep linking `/drawing/{id}?x={x}&y={y}&zoom={z}` and return to me a valid URL I can use in the browser?
-
That's great, so my expectation is that when I am on the `/search/diagnostic` results page (the screenshot that I shared earlier), and if I choose to click on the first result, it would navigate me to URL that you just provided. How would you describe that interaction, if we were writing a user story?

OK. Let me add a wrinkle, what if there are multiple results, meaning the "Occurences" column has number >1 how would we present to the user multiple "View on Drawing" navigation links to choose from?

↳ ux

Scheevel

↳ sm 
*story-checklist @10.3 Don't try to do too much

↳ qa 
*test-design @10.3 and update the story with your scenarios

↳ po 
*validate-story-draft @10.3 and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard

↳ analyst

Scheevel

↳ analyst
*elicit a new feature or refactoring that will implement the functionality described @docs/architecture/object-storage-migration.md
-
#3 Tree of Thoughts Deep Dive
-
I like Path 4: Lazy Migration (On-Demand)
-
Critical Questions (Q) to Refine the Approach
Q1: Unaccessed Files
100% of drawings are accessed regularly

Scheevel

↳ analyst
*elicit the refactoring discussed in this thread. Prepare a new Dev Story based on this spec and determine logical epic and story number from @docs/completed-epics.md or suggest a new epic and story.
-
Explain to me more about these aspects:
Fuzzy Matching Priority: Implement now or defer to Story 10.2.1?
Backfill Timing: Migration-time or separate script?
Search Ranking: Use defaults or custom tune ts_rank()?
-
Fuzzy, looks very useful, for when OCR mis-reads "C63" and engineer goes searching for "CG3", right? Also would be applicable to the new `searchable_text` column too, right?
Backfill Timing: Option A

Scheevel

pick up at archiving story 6.9

Chat me up, on what it would take to create an adhoc command, that I can execute to go find a particular value on all the drawings? This functionality would leverage the OCR capabilities of the application.

Ok. yes, let's draft a new dev story. Use @docs/completed-epics.md to determine the appropriate name, epic and story number.

Here are concepts I'm imagining. Correct my faulty assumptions:
 - we are capturing every readable bit of text on every page?
 - we can later go back and query for any value we seek?
 - can we do this with a combination of value & confidence? Is confidence part of the OCR-word-soup that will be created?

Scheevel

=qa 
*review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 2.7

create an e2e test spec for @
 - Navigate to http://localhost:3000/search
 - Click the first component's "View" action to view card
 - On card observe "Component Schema" value is propably "Default-Schema"
 - On card observe "Note" input box (a field inherited from the Default-Schema)
 - On card click "edit" action button
 - On card click "Cancel" action button