Scheevel · December 23, 2025 14:21
diff --git a/agentic-prompts-11-25.txt b/agentic-prompts-11-25.txt
 ↳ bmad-master
 Archive @ 2.9
 Archive @ 10.3
 Archive @ 10.3.1
 Archive all 11.1 through 11.4 stories.
 Also, archive collateral that may exist in `/architecture` or `/mockups` or `/qa` or `/stories`
 1. Review git changes for this and all these related documents (git diff, git status)
 2. Update @docs/completed-epics.md:
   - If this is the first story for a new epic, add the epic section
   - Add this story to the epic's "Stories Completed" list
   - Update "Key Files Created/Modified" if significant architecture changes
 3. Remove the story markdown file, once it has been consolidated into the completed-epics.md 
 4. Clean up all other story collateral that is no longer needed.
 Note: do remove any documents from `/keep` folder.
 Ask me any clarifying questions before beginning.

 Questions:
 Yes, create a new Epic 11 section with a title "OCR Search UX Enhancements". Infer what would be the Epic 11 business value summary. 
 -
 Story 2.9 and 10.3.1 are continuations of existing epics that should be added to Epic 2 and Epic 10.
 -
 Yes, search for files containing patterns like: 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4 (Epic 11 stories) | 2.9 (Epic 2 story) | 10.3.1 (Epic 10 story) | In these directories: /docs/architecture, /docs/mockups, /docs/qa, /docs/stories?
 -
 Yes lead me in a Git Review and show me the git diff/status BEFORE making changes
 -
 Under `/docs/stories` I see 10.3 still exists?
 -
 in `/docs/architecture` I see 10.3 and 10.4 stories that can be archived using the same format. Thanks

 ↳ me (no BMAD agent)
 Guide me through Whitelisting the commands during this chat session that prompted user approval and make them available from this session to a future sessions.

 ↳ bmad-master
 Instance Identifier Integration Tests / Integration Tests (API & Service Layer)
 -
 Failed in 3 minutes and 8 seconds

 ↳ architect
 Chat me up about how how should solve duplicate images. Multipage PDF's create this situation where, for example files "CT-12.14 Drawings_page1.pdf" and "CT-12.14 Drawings.pdf" get created. They are the same image. Ask me any clarifying questions.
 - 
 I'm not sure why you are asking me questions about truths that are presently documented in your code base?
 - 
 The user experience I want is Page-centric - "I need to see every page as a separate drawing because components live on pages" 
 -
 Additionally the documents should display in alphabetical order of each page names should be "page01" instead of "page1" when there are more than 10 pages.
 -
 Yes, please implement the zero risk changes now.
 -
 Go ahead and run the migration script now. Everything in the database is test data.
 -
 Docker is up and running. Are you able to run the migration?
 -
 Do we still need to map out solving the duplicate images issue?
 -
 Here's the problem. The parent PDF shows up in results, so if there is a search performed for a component of OCR result, 2 results are returned, the parent and page1, but they are the same.
 -
 the problem also exists if I simply go to `/drawings/` route and select a drawing, the pdf only show me page 1. So I effectively am viewing page 1 in 2 results at the `/drawings/` route.  I just don't see the value of every having the original file if the first page is the only thing that is ever visible, that feels confusing from a user perspective. 
 -
 Yes, ready to proceed
 -
 prepare an e2e evaluation: - Navigate to http://localhost:3000/drawings |  - Expected: results |  - Reality: message: Failed to load drawings. Please try again. | Evaluate the console or logs for errors

 ↳ analyst
 based on @ do you perceive we should `elicit` further or move straight to `create-doc` with the `story-tmpl.yaml` template to prepare a new Dev Story in the `/stories/` folder? 
 -
 Prepare a new Dev Story based on fulfilling this spec and determine logical epic and story number from @docs/completed-epics.md
 - Yes, create Story 9.6 using the story-tmpl.yaml template (retrospective style)

 ↳ architect
 In OCR search results, when clicking through to "View on Drawing" the boundng box displays first, but the drawing is empty, then the drawing is rendered in frame, it's like not waiting long enough before drawing the box and zooming in. Also it takes a while to load some of the high dpi images, a loading wait message would be helpful.
 -
 prepare an e2e evaluation: - Navigate to http://localhost:3000/drawings/9f351f50-258b-4315-a327-b194a4bd29e0?highlight=9745,6194,112,45 |  - Expected: an image with a bounding box | - Reality: image is missing and there is no bounding box | Evaluate the console or logs for errors
 -
 Problem A. It is a blank white canvas 
 -
 Nope. The image flashed on the screen then the image canvas was blank
 -
 Same behavior as before. The image flashed on the screen then the image canvas was blank
 -
 That works great!
 - 
 Clean up the collateral from testing, the commit all changes commit all changes tag as "known good check point"

 ↳ dev
 Determine the cause of the following error: When attempting to update the "Title" in the "Edit Component" card sometimes a message "Request failed with status code 422" is returned. And sometimes the message "Component updated successfully" is returned, however the "Title" value is not updated.
 -
 Yes, implement fix for @ bug
 -
 Still, save fails although the notification is of success
 -
 I have followed these instructions exactly sever times, nothing is being written to the console during the attempt to save. We need to go down a separate path. Can we instead write an e2e spec, you go look at the console and see what is missing?

 ↳ deployer
 We have written some debugging code to print to console, however having difficulty getting it deployed. Please use *smart-deploy-local to ensure debugging code is deployed locally.
 -
 Chat me up on the frontend issue. How can we resolve or stream-line this?

 ↳ dev
 I don't think you are testing the correct form. Here is the target HTML of the form that is producing the error, and no debugging info is being sent to console, even after completely rebuiding the docker instances.
 -
 Yes, fix both bugs

 ↳ deployer
 Please use *smart-deploy-local to ensure most recent code has deployed locally

 ↳ dev
 Prove to me the bug is fixed
 -
 Do you see in this screen shot, the message "Component updated successfully" yet the "Title" fields remains blank after a value was added and saved?

 ↳ deployer
 Please use *smart-deploy-local to ensure most recent code has deployed locally
 -
 commit all changes, this is for @ tag as "known good check point"

 ↳ dev
 While attempting to upload new drawing I received the following screenshot : "3.6 MB Failed 500: Upload failed: Unable to locate credentials"
 -
 Please investigate why Cloudflare R2 credentials are no longer in the Docker Compose files.
 -
 Understanding that the system implements hybrid storage with volume-based local development and R2-based production deployment. And that for Local Development R2 credentials are not required why then does an attempt to upload a new image http://localhost:3000/upload produce the message "3.6 MB Failed 500: Upload failed: Unable to locate credentials"
 -
 Write a summary, "Story 10.4.1: Fix hybrid storage for local development" for the architect to review. Include in the summary, Feature flag proposal, validation test descriptions, regression test descriptions, and proposal to update CLAUDE.md with USE_R2_STORAGE flag explanation.

 ↳ architect
 Update @ 10.4.1 addressing any architectural concerns listed in the document

 ↳ po
 *validate-story-draft @ 10.4.1 and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard 
 -
 Make the required fixes (add user story format + change log) and update status to "Ready for Dev Start"

 ↳ dev
 *develop-story @ 10.4.1 you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story.

 ↳ qa
 *review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 10.4.1

 ↳ deployer
 update you deployment workflow instruction based on @ 10.4.1
 -
 Is any docker build or deployment steps need for these changes to be refelcted in the local environment? 

 ↳ bmad-master
 @ 10.4.1 has been successfully deployed and is operating as expected. However the "Status" of the new drawings appears stuck in "Pending" can you provide a analysis of why?
 -
 Perform option 2 and then confirm  "detect_orphaned_tasks" execution. 
 -

 ↳ architect
 Chat me up how we can harden this critical discovery: The upload flow has NO validation that Celery tasks were successfully dispatched. This creates a "phantom success" UX where uploads appear successful but processing never starts. How can we either verify task dispatch succeeded before returning HTTP 200, or implement a "pending task monitor" that auto-retries dispatch for orphaned pending drawings. Or do you suggest a better solution?
 -
 I agree with your recommended Solution 3 (Hybrid). Write an architectural proposal for hand-off to the analyst.
 -
 which should analyst work from @docs/architecture/task...summary.md or @docs/architecture/task...reliability.md ? 

 ↳ analyst
 based on @ task-dispatch do you perceive we should `elicit` further or move straight to `create-doc` with the `story-tmpl.yaml` template to prepare a new Dev Story in the `/stories/` folder? 
 -
 *create-doc
 -
 #1 Proceed to next section, how many sections do we need to get through?
 -
 There is no need for task 13 for "staging and smoke test". Performance will be an iterative goal and testing should be optional. There is no need for rollback testing, errors will be addressed individually.
 -
 Keep Dev Notes appropriately comprehensive, your judgement
 -
 It is adjacent, so is additional context about Story 10.4.1 (Hybrid Storage) dependencies needed?

 ↳ @dev
 *develop-story @ 10.4.3 you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story

 ↳ qa
 *review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 10.4.3

 ↳ dev
 *review-qa @ 10.4.3 and resolve issues following QA guidance

 ↳ deployer
 I've stopped all docker containers, now *smart-deploy-local @ 10.4.3
	↳ bmad-master
	Archive @ 2.9
	Archive @ 10.3
	Archive @ 10.3.1
	Archive all 11.1 through 11.4 stories.
	Also, archive collateral that may exist in `/architecture` or `/mockups` or `/qa` or `/stories`
	1. Review git changes for this and all these related documents (git diff, git status)
	2. Update @docs/completed-epics.md:
	- If this is the first story for a new epic, add the epic section
	- Add this story to the epic's "Stories Completed" list
	- Update "Key Files Created/Modified" if significant architecture changes
	3. Remove the story markdown file, once it has been consolidated into the completed-epics.md
	4. Clean up all other story collateral that is no longer needed.
	Note: do remove any documents from `/keep` folder.
	Ask me any clarifying questions before beginning.

	Questions:
	Yes, create a new Epic 11 section with a title "OCR Search UX Enhancements". Infer what would be the Epic 11 business value summary.
	-
	Story 2.9 and 10.3.1 are continuations of existing epics that should be added to Epic 2 and Epic 10.
	-
	Yes, search for files containing patterns like: 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4 (Epic 11 stories) \| 2.9 (Epic 2 story) \| 10.3.1 (Epic 10 story) \| In these directories: /docs/architecture, /docs/mockups, /docs/qa, /docs/stories?
	-
	Yes lead me in a Git Review and show me the git diff/status BEFORE making changes
	-
	Under `/docs/stories` I see 10.3 still exists?
	-
	in `/docs/architecture` I see 10.3 and 10.4 stories that can be archived using the same format. Thanks

	↳ me (no BMAD agent)
	Guide me through Whitelisting the commands during this chat session that prompted user approval and make them available from this session to a future sessions.

	↳ bmad-master
	Instance Identifier Integration Tests / Integration Tests (API & Service Layer)
	-
	Failed in 3 minutes and 8 seconds

	↳ architect
	Chat me up about how how should solve duplicate images. Multipage PDF's create this situation where, for example files "CT-12.14 Drawings_page1.pdf" and "CT-12.14 Drawings.pdf" get created. They are the same image. Ask me any clarifying questions.
	-
	I'm not sure why you are asking me questions about truths that are presently documented in your code base?
	-
	The user experience I want is Page-centric - "I need to see every page as a separate drawing because components live on pages"
	-
	Additionally the documents should display in alphabetical order of each page names should be "page01" instead of "page1" when there are more than 10 pages.
	-
	Yes, please implement the zero risk changes now.
	-
	Go ahead and run the migration script now. Everything in the database is test data.
	-
	Docker is up and running. Are you able to run the migration?
	-
	Do we still need to map out solving the duplicate images issue?
	-
	Here's the problem. The parent PDF shows up in results, so if there is a search performed for a component of OCR result, 2 results are returned, the parent and page1, but they are the same.
	-
	the problem also exists if I simply go to `/drawings/` route and select a drawing, the pdf only show me page 1. So I effectively am viewing page 1 in 2 results at the `/drawings/` route. I just don't see the value of every having the original file if the first page is the only thing that is ever visible, that feels confusing from a user perspective.
	-
	Yes, ready to proceed
	-
	prepare an e2e evaluation: - Navigate to http://localhost:3000/drawings \| - Expected: results \| - Reality: message: Failed to load drawings. Please try again. \| Evaluate the console or logs for errors

	↳ analyst
	based on @ do you perceive we should `elicit` further or move straight to `create-doc` with the `story-tmpl.yaml` template to prepare a new Dev Story in the `/stories/` folder?
	-
	Prepare a new Dev Story based on fulfilling this spec and determine logical epic and story number from @docs/completed-epics.md
	- Yes, create Story 9.6 using the story-tmpl.yaml template (retrospective style)

	↳ architect
	In OCR search results, when clicking through to "View on Drawing" the boundng box displays first, but the drawing is empty, then the drawing is rendered in frame, it's like not waiting long enough before drawing the box and zooming in. Also it takes a while to load some of the high dpi images, a loading wait message would be helpful.
	-
	prepare an e2e evaluation: - Navigate to http://localhost:3000/drawings/9f351f50-258b-4315-a327-b194a4bd29e0?highlight=9745,6194,112,45 \| - Expected: an image with a bounding box \| - Reality: image is missing and there is no bounding box \| Evaluate the console or logs for errors
	-
	Problem A. It is a blank white canvas
	-
	Nope. The image flashed on the screen then the image canvas was blank
	-
	Same behavior as before. The image flashed on the screen then the image canvas was blank
	-
	That works great!
	-
	Clean up the collateral from testing, the commit all changes commit all changes tag as "known good check point"

	↳ dev
	Determine the cause of the following error: When attempting to update the "Title" in the "Edit Component" card sometimes a message "Request failed with status code 422" is returned. And sometimes the message "Component updated successfully" is returned, however the "Title" value is not updated.
	-
	Yes, implement fix for @ bug
	-
	Still, save fails although the notification is of success
	-
	I have followed these instructions exactly sever times, nothing is being written to the console during the attempt to save. We need to go down a separate path. Can we instead write an e2e spec, you go look at the console and see what is missing?

	↳ deployer
	We have written some debugging code to print to console, however having difficulty getting it deployed. Please use *smart-deploy-local to ensure debugging code is deployed locally.
	-
	Chat me up on the frontend issue. How can we resolve or stream-line this?

	↳ dev
	I don't think you are testing the correct form. Here is the target HTML of the form that is producing the error, and no debugging info is being sent to console, even after completely rebuiding the docker instances.
	-
	Yes, fix both bugs

	↳ deployer
	Please use *smart-deploy-local to ensure most recent code has deployed locally

	↳ dev
	Prove to me the bug is fixed
	-
	Do you see in this screen shot, the message "Component updated successfully" yet the "Title" fields remains blank after a value was added and saved?

	↳ deployer
	Please use *smart-deploy-local to ensure most recent code has deployed locally
	-
	commit all changes, this is for @ tag as "known good check point"

	↳ dev
	While attempting to upload new drawing I received the following screenshot : "3.6 MB Failed 500: Upload failed: Unable to locate credentials"
	-
	Please investigate why Cloudflare R2 credentials are no longer in the Docker Compose files.
	-
	Understanding that the system implements hybrid storage with volume-based local development and R2-based production deployment. And that for Local Development R2 credentials are not required why then does an attempt to upload a new image http://localhost:3000/upload produce the message "3.6 MB Failed 500: Upload failed: Unable to locate credentials"
	-
	Write a summary, "Story 10.4.1: Fix hybrid storage for local development" for the architect to review. Include in the summary, Feature flag proposal, validation test descriptions, regression test descriptions, and proposal to update CLAUDE.md with USE_R2_STORAGE flag explanation.

	↳ architect
	Update @ 10.4.1 addressing any architectural concerns listed in the document

	↳ po
	*validate-story-draft @ 10.4.1 and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard
	-
	Make the required fixes (add user story format + change log) and update status to "Ready for Dev Start"

	↳ dev
	*develop-story @ 10.4.1 you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story.

	↳ qa
	review and gate based on scenarios in @ 10.4.1

	↳ deployer
	update you deployment workflow instruction based on @ 10.4.1
	-
	Is any docker build or deployment steps need for these changes to be refelcted in the local environment?

	↳ bmad-master
	@ 10.4.1 has been successfully deployed and is operating as expected. However the "Status" of the new drawings appears stuck in "Pending" can you provide a analysis of why?
	-
	Perform option 2 and then confirm "detect_orphaned_tasks" execution.
	-

	↳ architect
	Chat me up how we can harden this critical discovery: The upload flow has NO validation that Celery tasks were successfully dispatched. This creates a "phantom success" UX where uploads appear successful but processing never starts. How can we either verify task dispatch succeeded before returning HTTP 200, or implement a "pending task monitor" that auto-retries dispatch for orphaned pending drawings. Or do you suggest a better solution?
	-
	I agree with your recommended Solution 3 (Hybrid). Write an architectural proposal for hand-off to the analyst.
	-
	which should analyst work from @docs/architecture/task...summary.md or @docs/architecture/task...reliability.md ?

	↳ analyst
	based on @ task-dispatch do you perceive we should `elicit` further or move straight to `create-doc` with the `story-tmpl.yaml` template to prepare a new Dev Story in the `/stories/` folder?
	-
	*create-doc
	-
	#1 Proceed to next section, how many sections do we need to get through?
	-
	There is no need for task 13 for "staging and smoke test". Performance will be an iterative goal and testing should be optional. There is no need for rollback testing, errors will be addressed individually.
	-
	Keep Dev Notes appropriately comprehensive, your judgement
	-
	It is adjacent, so is additional context about Story 10.4.1 (Hybrid Storage) dependencies needed?

	↳ @dev
	*develop-story @ 10.4.3 you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story

	↳ qa
	review and gate based on scenarios in @ 10.4.3

	↳ dev
	*review-qa @ 10.4.3 and resolve issues following QA guidance

	↳ deployer
	I've stopped all docker containers, now *smart-deploy-local @ 10.4.3
No results found