Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Scheevel
Last active December 23, 2025 14:11
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save Scheevel/53695d064684f3d9d3f3bd00bfd90557 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save Scheevel/53695d064684f3d9d3f3bd00bfd90557 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Stories 10.4/11.4: BMAD agent execution for OCR UI.
↳ architect
@ project-scoped-ocr is an older story, api end points and route names may have changed. "Current Architecture Context" needs to be re-evaluated as do all the other sections. However your design captures the user behavior we are seeking.
-
what is the logical epic & story number for this spec?
-
agree, Use Story 10.4 and renumber the PRD's future stories,
↳ ux
Can you display for me a static .html mockup of how this @docs/architecture/ spec will appear rendered in the browser?
↳ architect
Chat me up about changing the Menu item: "Search Components" label to "Search" so that the `/search` route should have 2 tabs: "Search Components" & "Search OCR"
-
The current `/search` route will be the "Search Components" tab and the current `/search/diagnostic` route will be the "Search OCR" tab.
-
Should we rename any routes so things make better sense?
-
Also purge all reference to 10.6 in the project, that story was created in error. Ask me any clarifying questions
-
What is the logical epic & story number for this spec? Once complete create a work document in your `/architecture/` folder
-
Yes proceed with the recommended defaults
↳ ux
Can you display for me a simple static .html mockup the UI changes proposed in @docs/architecture/story-11.4 spec will appear rendered in the browser?
-
That looks great, please move the file to the `docs/mockups` folder
↳ analyst
based on @11.4 do you perceive we should `elicit` further or move straight to `create-doc` with the `story-tmpl.yaml` template to prepare a new Dev Story in the `/stories/` folder?
-
proceed with create-doc option 1
↳ sm
*story-checklist @11.4 Don't try to do too much
↳ qa
*test-design @11.4 and update the story with your scenarios
↳ architect
Regarding @ 11.4 there is some question around Developer Perspective. Here's what I'd struggle with, the unclear parts - Refactoring scope: Should dev copy-paste SearchPage code or extract shared logic? Tab switching UX: Does this allow search queries to persist across tabs? This is a desired feature. TabPanel location: Inline component or separate file? Page-level UI: Which specific components are "page-level" vs. "tab-level"? (requires reading SearchPage.tsx carefully). If "independent tab state", would URL param handling need to be re-done to implement "shared search query across tabs"? Q2: Sorry, I misinterpretted the requirement. I don't want "shared" I want search between the two tabs to be independent, but preserved. I want to search on each tab and then go back and forth to and have the prior search results still display
↳ sm
The "developer perspective" issues have been addressed, please confirm
↳ qa
*test-design @ 11.4 and update the story with your scenarios
↳ po
*validate-story-draft @11.4 and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard
↳ dev
*develop-story @11.4 you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story
↳ bmad-master
@10.4 was meant to be incorporated into @11.4, however it may have have been overlooked, can you provide the status by evalauting the current state of the project code?
-
Yes, proceed with implementing @ 10.4 but be aware that this was written when the OCR search feature was located at a different route. This now needs to align with the OCR search location implemented in 11.4
-
the following URL displays "No OCR variations found" ...
↳ qa
*review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 11.4
↳ dev
*review-qa @ 11.4 and resolve issues following QA guidance
↳ qa
please re-evaluate changed by the developer *review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 11.4
↳ deployer
I've stopped all docker containers, now *smart-deploy-local @ 11.4
-
Yes, proceeed
↳ dev
create an e2e test spec for @ 11.4: Navigate to http://localhost:3000/drawings | First result is file name "001-08-201.jpg" | Icon denotes file is assigned to project "nm-ffc" | click on filter toggle "Unassigned Only"| Expected: file name "001-08-201.jpg" is not present in the filtered results | Reality: file name "001-08-201.jpg" shows in the results | Evaluate the console or logs for errors | The backend is available now. Try it again.
↳ architect
Suggest a fix for this Bug Detection: Drawing should NOT be visible but IS still present. Table shows project chips (assigned drawings) in "unassigned only" view. API Request Analysis. The test logs show: API Request: GET http://localhost:8001/api/v1/drawings/?page=1&limit=20 | Issue: After clicking the toggle, the API request doesn't include the project_id=null parameter or any indication of the unassigned filter. This suggests the bug is in the frontend filter state management - the URL updates but the API call doesn't receive the correct parameters. Testing shows the URL updates correctly (?unassigned=true), but the API request doesn't change, indicating the bug is in the React Query useQuery dependency array or the filter state synchronization in DrawingsListPage.tsx:117-149. The test file is located at: e2e/drawing-list-unassigned-filter-bug.spec.ts
-
Yes, please implement
↳ deployer
*smart-deploy-web @ 11.1 throught 11.4
-
How's the build coming?
-
commit all changes, this is for @ 11.4 tag as "known good check point"
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment