Last active
August 30, 2025 18:15
-
-
Save ttappr/41298f28dc8db93600c63601ed3d3168 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
A Rust version of the Python heapq module.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| //! ## Heap queue algorithm (a.k.a. priority queue). | |
| //! | |
| //! Heaps are arrays for which `a[k] <= a[2*k+1]` and `a[k] <= a[2*k+2]` for | |
| //! all `k`, counting elements from `0`. For the sake of comparison, | |
| //! non-existing elements are considered to be infinite. The interesting | |
| //! property of a heap is that `a[0]` is always its smallest element. | |
| //! | |
| //! Usage: | |
| //! | |
| //! ```rust,ignore | |
| //! // create an empty heap | |
| //! let mut heap = vec![]; | |
| //! | |
| //! // push a new item on the heap | |
| //! heap_push(&mut heap, item); | |
| //! | |
| //! // pop the smallest item from the heap | |
| //! let item = heap_pop(&mut heap); | |
| //! | |
| //! // get the smallest item on the heap without popping it | |
| //! let item = &heap[0]; | |
| //! | |
| //! // transform slice into a heap, in-place, in linear time | |
| //! heapify(&mut x); | |
| //! | |
| //! // push a new item and then returns the smallest item; the heap size is | |
| //! // unchanged | |
| //! item = heap_pushpop(&mut heap, item); | |
| //! | |
| //! // pop and returns smallest item, and adds new item; the heap size is | |
| //! // unchanged | |
| //! item = heap_replace(&mut heap, item); | |
| //! ``` | |
| //! | |
| //! Our API differs from textbook heap algorithms as follows: | |
| //! | |
| //! - We use 0-based indexing. This makes the relationship between the | |
| //! index for a node and the indexes for its children slightly less | |
| //! obvious, but is more suitable since Rust uses 0-based indexing. | |
| //! - Our `heap_pop()` method returns the smallest item, not the largest. | |
| //! | |
| //! These two make it possible to view the heap as a regular Rust slice | |
| //! without surprises: `heap[0]` is the smallest item, and `heap.sort()` | |
| //! maintains the heap invariant! | |
| //! | |
| //! ## Heap queues | |
| //! | |
| //! *explanation by François Pinard* | |
| //! | |
| //! Heaps are arrays for which `a[k] <= a[2*k+1]` and `a[k] <= a[2*k+2]` for | |
| //! all `k`, counting elements from `0`. For the sake of comparison, | |
| //! non-existing elements are considered to be infinite. The interesting | |
| //! property of a heap is that `a[0]` is always its smallest element. | |
| //! | |
| //! The strange invariant above is meant to be an efficient memory | |
| //! representation for a tournament. The numbers below are `k`, not `a[k]`: | |
| //! ```ignore | |
| //! 0 | |
| //! | |
| //! 1 2 | |
| //! | |
| //! 3 4 5 6 | |
| //! | |
| //! 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | |
| //! | |
| //! 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 | |
| //! ``` | |
| //! | |
| //! In the tree above, each cell `k` is topping `2*k+1` and `2*k+2`. In | |
| //! a usual binary tournament we see in sports, each cell is the winner | |
| //! over the two cells it tops, and we can trace the winner down the tree | |
| //! to see all opponents s/he had. However, in many computer applications | |
| //! of such tournaments, we do not need to trace the history of a winner. | |
| //! To be more memory efficient, when a winner is promoted, we try to | |
| //! replace it by something else at a lower level, and the rule becomes | |
| //! that a cell and the two cells it tops contain three different items, | |
| //! but the top cell "wins" over the two topped cells. | |
| //! | |
| //! If this heap invariant is protected at all time, index 0 is clearly | |
| //! the overall winner. The simplest algorithmic way to remove it and | |
| //! find the "next" winner is to move some loser (let's say cell 30 in the | |
| //! diagram above) into the 0 position, and then percolate this new 0 down | |
| //! the tree, exchanging values, until the invariant is re-established. | |
| //! This is clearly logarithmic on the total number of items in the tree. | |
| //! By iterating over all items, you get an `O(n ln n)` sort. | |
| //! | |
| //! A nice feature of this sort is that you can efficiently insert new | |
| //! items while the sort is going on, provided that the inserted items are | |
| //! not "better" than the last 0'th element you extracted. This is | |
| //! especially useful in simulation contexts, where the tree holds all | |
| //! incoming events, and the "win" condition means the smallest scheduled | |
| //! time. When an event schedule other events for execution, they are | |
| //! scheduled into the future, so they can easily go into the heap. So, a | |
| //! heap is a good structure for implementing schedulers (this is what I | |
| //! used for my MIDI sequencer :-). | |
| //! | |
| //! Various structures for implementing schedulers have been extensively | |
| //! studied, and heaps are good for this, as they are reasonably speedy, | |
| //! the speed is almost constant, and the worst case is not much different | |
| //! than the average case. However, there are other representations which | |
| //! are more efficient overall, yet the worst cases might be terrible. | |
| //! | |
| //! Heaps are also very useful in big disk sorts. You most probably all | |
| //! know that a big sort implies producing "runs" (which are pre-sorted | |
| //! sequences, which size is usually related to the amount of CPU memory), | |
| //! followed by a merging passes for these runs, which merging is often | |
| //! very cleverly organised[1]. It is very important that the initial | |
| //! sort produces the longest runs possible. Tournaments are a good way | |
| //! to that. If, using all the memory available to hold a tournament, you | |
| //! replace and percolate items that happen to fit the current run, you'll | |
| //! produce runs which are twice the size of the memory for random input, | |
| //! and much better for input fuzzily ordered. | |
| //! | |
| //! Moreover, if you output the 0'th item on disk and get an input which | |
| //! may not fit in the current tournament (because the value "wins" over | |
| //! the last output value), it cannot fit in the heap, so the size of the | |
| //! heap decreases. The freed memory could be cleverly reused immediately | |
| //! for progressively building a second heap, which grows at exactly the | |
| //! same rate the first heap is melting. When the first heap completely | |
| //! vanishes, you switch heaps and start a new run. Clever and quite | |
| //! effective! | |
| //! | |
| //! In a word, heaps are useful memory structures to know. I use them in | |
| //! a few applications, and I think it is good to keep a `heap` module | |
| //! around. :-) | |
| //! | |
| //! --- | |
| //! [1] The disk balancing algorithms which are current, nowadays, are | |
| //! more annoying than clever, and this is a consequence of the seeking | |
| //! capabilities of the disks. On devices which cannot seek, like big | |
| //! tape drives, the story was quite different, and one had to be very | |
| //! clever to ensure (far in advance) that each tape movement will be the | |
| //! most effective possible (that is, will best participate at | |
| //! "progressing" the merge). Some tapes were even able to read | |
| //! backwards, and this was also used to avoid the rewinding time. | |
| //! Believe me, real good tape sorts were quite spectacular to watch! | |
| //! From all times, sorting has always been a Great Art! :-) | |
| use std::cmp::Ordering::{self, Less}; | |
| /// Transform slice into a heap, in-place, in O(n) time. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heapify<T>(heap: &mut [T]) | |
| where | |
| T: Ord | |
| { | |
| heapify_with(heap, T::cmp); | |
| } | |
| /// Transform slice into a heap in place using `cmp` for comparisons. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heapify_with<T, C>(heap: &mut [T], cmp: C) | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T) -> Ordering | |
| { | |
| heapify_with_aux(heap, |a, b, _| cmp(a, b), ()); | |
| } | |
| /// Transform slice into a heap in place using `cmp` for comparisons. The `aux` | |
| /// parameter allows passing aribitrary data to `cmp`. This could be a | |
| /// reference to another related structure needed for comparisons. | |
| /// | |
| /// # Example | |
| /// | |
| /// ```rust | |
| /// use heapq::*; | |
| /// | |
| /// let values = [17, 42, 1, 8, 71, 241, 122]; | |
| /// | |
| /// let mut index_heap = (0..values.len()).collect::<Vec<_>>(); | |
| /// | |
| /// let cmp = |a: &usize, b: &usize, x: &[i32]| x[*a].cmp(&x[*b]); | |
| /// | |
| /// heapify_with_aux(&mut index_heap, cmp, &values); | |
| /// | |
| /// let item_idx = heap_pop_with_aux(&mut index_heap, cmp, &values).unwrap(); | |
| /// let item = values[item_idx]; | |
| /// | |
| /// assert_eq!(item, 1); | |
| /// | |
| /// let item_idx = heap_pop_with_aux(&mut index_heap, cmp, &values).unwrap(); | |
| /// let item = values[item_idx]; | |
| /// | |
| /// assert_eq!(item, 8); | |
| /// ``` | |
| /// | |
| pub fn heapify_with_aux<T, C, A>(heap: &mut [T], cmp: C, aux: A) | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T, A) -> Ordering, | |
| A: Copy | |
| { | |
| for i in (0..heap.len() / 2).rev() { | |
| sift_up(heap, i, &cmp, aux); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Push item onto heap, maintaining the heap invariant. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heap_push<T>(heap: &mut Vec<T>, item: T) | |
| where | |
| T: Ord | |
| { | |
| heap_push_with(heap, item, T::cmp); | |
| } | |
| /// Push item onto the heap using the comparison function `cmp`. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heap_push_with<T, C>(heap: &mut Vec<T>, item: T, cmp: C) | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T) -> Ordering | |
| { | |
| heap_push_with_aux(heap, item, |a, b, _| cmp(a, b), ()); | |
| } | |
| /// Push the item onto the heap using the comparison function `cmp` with | |
| /// auxiliary data `aux` to be passed to `cmp`. | |
| /// | |
| pub fn heap_push_with_aux<T, C, A>(heap: &mut Vec<T>, item: T, cmp: C, aux: A) | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T, A) -> Ordering, | |
| A: Copy | |
| { | |
| let len = heap.len(); | |
| heap.push(item); | |
| sift_down(heap, 0, len, cmp, aux); | |
| } | |
| /// Pop the smallest item off the heap, maintaining the heap invariant. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heap_pop<T>(heap: &mut Vec<T>) -> Option<T> | |
| where | |
| T: Ord | |
| { | |
| heap_pop_with(heap, T::cmp) | |
| } | |
| /// Pop the smallest item off the heap and maintain the invariant using the | |
| /// comparison function `cmp`. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heap_pop_with<T, C>(heap: &mut Vec<T>, cmp: C) -> Option<T> | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T) -> Ordering | |
| { | |
| heap_pop_with_aux(heap, |a, b, _| cmp(a, b), ()) | |
| } | |
| /// Pop the smallest item off the heap, maintaining the invariant using `cmd` | |
| /// which accepts auxiliary data `aux` on each call. | |
| /// | |
| pub fn heap_pop_with_aux<T, C, A>(heap: &mut Vec<T>, cmp: C, aux: A) | |
| -> Option<T> | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T, A) -> Ordering, | |
| A: Copy | |
| { | |
| if !heap.is_empty() { | |
| let returnitem = heap.swap_remove(0); | |
| sift_up(heap, 0, cmp, aux); | |
| Some(returnitem) | |
| } else { | |
| None | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Fast version of a heap_push followed by a heap_pop. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heap_pushpop<T>(heap: &mut [T], item: T) -> T | |
| where | |
| T: Ord | |
| { | |
| heap_pushpop_with(heap, item, T::cmp) | |
| } | |
| /// Fast version of a heap_push followed by a heap_pop that takes a comparator | |
| /// for instances of `T`. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heap_pushpop_with<T, C>(heap: &mut [T], item: T, cmp: C) -> T | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T) -> Ordering | |
| { | |
| heap_pushpop_with_aux(heap, item, |a, b, _| cmp(a, b), ()) | |
| } | |
| /// Fast version of a heap_push followed by a heap_pop that takes a comparison | |
| /// function and auxiliary data that gets passed to `cmp` on each call. | |
| /// | |
| pub fn heap_pushpop_with_aux<T, C, A>(heap : &mut [T], | |
| item : T, | |
| cmp : C, | |
| aux : A) | |
| -> T | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T, A) -> Ordering, | |
| A: Copy | |
| { | |
| if !heap.is_empty() && cmp(&heap[0], &item, aux) == Less { | |
| let item = std::mem::replace(&mut heap[0], item); | |
| sift_up(heap, 0, cmp, aux); | |
| item | |
| } else { | |
| item | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Pops an item from the heap and pushes the new item onto it. The popped item | |
| /// is returned. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heap_replace<T>(heap: &mut [T], item: T) -> T | |
| where | |
| T: Ord | |
| { | |
| heap_replace_with(heap, item, T::cmp) | |
| } | |
| /// Pops an item from the heap, pushes the new item, then returns item. `cmp` is | |
| /// the comparison function used to maintain the heap. | |
| /// | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn heap_replace_with<T, C>(heap: &mut [T], item: T, cmp: C) -> T | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T) -> Ordering | |
| { | |
| heap_replace_with_aux(heap, item, |a, b, _| cmp(a, b), ()) | |
| } | |
| /// Pop and return the current smallest value, and add the new item. `cmp` is | |
| /// the heap's comparison function for instances of `T` and `aux` and is | |
| /// auxiliary data passed to `cmp` when infoked. `aux` can be a reference to | |
| /// another structure needed for the comparisons. | |
| /// | |
| /// This is more efficient than heappop() followed by heappush(), and can be | |
| /// more appropriate when using a fixed-size heap. Note that the value | |
| /// returned may be larger than item! That constrains reasonable uses of | |
| /// this routine unless written as part of a conditional replacement: | |
| /// ```rust,ignore | |
| /// if item > heap[0] { | |
| /// item = heap_replace(heap, item); | |
| /// } | |
| /// ``` | |
| /// | |
| pub fn heap_replace_with_aux<T, C, A>(heap: &mut [T], | |
| item: T, | |
| cmp: C, | |
| aux: A) | |
| -> T | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T, A) -> Ordering, | |
| A: Copy | |
| { | |
| if !heap.is_empty() { | |
| let item = std::mem::replace(&mut heap[0], item); | |
| sift_up(heap, 0, cmp, aux); | |
| item | |
| } else { | |
| item | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // The child indices of heap index pos are already heaps, and we want to make | |
| // a heap at index pos too. We do this by bubbling the smaller child of | |
| // pos up (and so on with that child's children, etc) until hitting a leaf, | |
| // then using _siftdown to move the oddball originally at index pos into place. | |
| // | |
| // We *could* break out of the loop as soon as we find a pos where newitem <= | |
| // both its children, but turns out that's not a good idea, and despite that | |
| // many books write the algorithm that way. During a heap pop, the last array | |
| // element is sifted in, and that tends to be large, so that comparing it | |
| // against values starting from the root usually doesn't pay (= usually doesn't | |
| // get us out of the loop early). See Knuth, Volume 3, where this is | |
| // explained and quantified in an exercise. | |
| // | |
| // Cutting the # of comparisons is important, since these routines have no | |
| // way to extract "the priority" from an array element, so that intelligence | |
| // is likely to be hiding in custom comparison methods, or in array elements | |
| // storing (priority, record) tuples. Comparisons are thus potentially | |
| // expensive. | |
| // | |
| // On random arrays of length 1000, making this change cut the number of | |
| // comparisons made by heapify() a little, and those made by exhaustive | |
| // heappop() a lot, in accord with theory. Here are typical results from 3 | |
| // runs (3 just to demonstrate how small the variance is): | |
| // | |
| // Compares needed by heapify Compares needed by 1000 heappops | |
| // -------------------------- -------------------------------- | |
| // 1837 cut to 1663 14996 cut to 8680 | |
| // 1855 cut to 1659 14966 cut to 8678 | |
| // 1847 cut to 1660 15024 cut to 8703 | |
| // | |
| // Building the heap by using heappush() 1000 times instead required | |
| // 2198, 2148, and 2219 compares: heapify() is more efficient, when | |
| // you can use it. | |
| // | |
| // The total compares needed by slice.sort() on the same slices were 8627, | |
| // 8627, and 8632 (this should be compared to the sum of heapify() and | |
| // heappop() compares): slice.sort() is (unsurprisingly!) more efficient | |
| // for sorting. | |
| fn sift_up<T, C, A>(heap: &mut [T], pos: usize, cmp: C, aux: A) | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T, A) -> Ordering, | |
| A: Copy | |
| { | |
| let mut pos = pos; | |
| let endpos = heap.len(); | |
| let startpos = pos; | |
| let mut childpos = 2 * pos + 1; | |
| while childpos < endpos { | |
| let rightpos = childpos + 1; | |
| if rightpos < endpos | |
| && cmp(&heap[childpos], &heap[rightpos], aux) != Less { | |
| childpos = rightpos; | |
| } | |
| heap.swap(pos, childpos); | |
| pos = childpos; | |
| childpos = 2 * pos + 1; | |
| } | |
| sift_down(heap, startpos, pos, cmp, aux); | |
| } | |
| // 'heap' is a heap at all indices >= startpos, except possibly for pos. pos | |
| // is the index of a leaf with a possibly out-of-order value. Restore the | |
| // heap invariant. | |
| fn sift_down<T, C, A>(heap : &mut [T], | |
| startpos : usize, | |
| pos : usize, | |
| cmp : C, | |
| aux : A) | |
| where | |
| C: Fn(&T, &T, A) -> Ordering, | |
| A: Copy | |
| { | |
| let mut pos = pos; | |
| while pos > startpos { | |
| let parentpos = (pos - 1) >> 1; | |
| if cmp(&heap[pos], &heap[parentpos], aux) == Less { | |
| heap.swap(pos, parentpos); | |
| pos = parentpos; | |
| } else { | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| #[cfg(test)] | |
| mod tests { | |
| use super::*; | |
| // The sequence 0 to 99 (inclusive) shuffled. | |
| const SHUFFLED_INTS: [i32; 100] = [ | |
| 23, 22, 55, 87, 59, 27, 90, 14, 82, 21, 44, 75, | |
| 20, 50, 3, 34, 83, 72, 68, 8, 57, 58, 6, 95, 16, | |
| 28, 13, 86, 76, 30, 79, 54, 24, 80, 65, 84, 53, | |
| 78, 67, 56, 18, 93, 61, 42, 10, 77, 40, 2, 71, | |
| 47, 85, 7, 26, 33, 32, 62, 9, 92, 43, 38, 88, | |
| 73, 74, 41, 4, 35, 70, 19, 69, 15, 94, 0, 66, | |
| 39, 31, 63, 89, 5, 25, 99, 91, 51, 98, 97, 1, | |
| 96, 29, 37, 36, 45, 17, 11, 52, 60, 49, 81, 48, | |
| 12, 46, 64 | |
| ]; | |
| const ORDERED_INTS: [i32; 100] = [ | |
| 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, | |
| 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, | |
| 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, | |
| 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, | |
| 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, | |
| 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, | |
| 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, | |
| 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, | |
| 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 | |
| ]; | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heapify() { | |
| let mut heap = SHUFFLED_INTS.to_vec(); | |
| heapify(&mut heap); | |
| let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(heap.len()); | |
| while let Some(v) = heap_pop(&mut heap) { | |
| result.push(v); | |
| } | |
| assert_eq!(result, ORDERED_INTS); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heapify_with() { | |
| let mut heap = SHUFFLED_INTS.to_vec(); | |
| let cmp = |a: &i32, b: &i32| a.cmp(&b); | |
| heapify_with(&mut heap, cmp); | |
| let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(heap.len()); | |
| while let Some(v) = heap_pop_with(&mut heap, cmp) { | |
| result.push(v); | |
| } | |
| assert_eq!(result, ORDERED_INTS); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heapify_with_aux() { | |
| let mut index_heap = (0..100).collect::<Vec<_>>(); | |
| let cmp = |a: &usize, b: &usize, x: &[i32]| x[*a].cmp(&x[*b]); | |
| heapify_with_aux(&mut index_heap, cmp, &SHUFFLED_INTS); | |
| let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(index_heap.len()); | |
| while let Some(i) | |
| = heap_pop_with_aux(&mut index_heap, cmp, &SHUFFLED_INTS) { | |
| result.push(SHUFFLED_INTS[i]); | |
| } | |
| assert_eq!(result, ORDERED_INTS); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_push() { | |
| let vals = SHUFFLED_INTS.to_vec(); | |
| let mut heap = Vec::with_capacity(vals.len()); | |
| let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(vals.len()); | |
| for val in vals { | |
| heap_push(&mut heap, val); | |
| } | |
| while let Some(v) = heap_pop(&mut heap) { | |
| result.push(v); | |
| } | |
| assert_eq!(result, ORDERED_INTS); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_push_with() { | |
| let vals = SHUFFLED_INTS.to_vec(); | |
| let cmp = |a: &i32, b: &i32| a.cmp(&b); | |
| let mut heap = Vec::with_capacity(vals.len()); | |
| let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(vals.len()); | |
| for val in vals { | |
| heap_push_with(&mut heap, val, cmp); | |
| } | |
| while let Some(v) = heap_pop_with(&mut heap, cmp) { | |
| result.push(v); | |
| } | |
| assert_eq!(result, ORDERED_INTS); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_push_with_aux() { | |
| let mut index_heap = Vec::with_capacity(100); | |
| let cmp = |a: &usize, b: &usize, x: &[i32]| x[*a].cmp(&x[*b]); | |
| for i in 0..100 { | |
| heap_push_with_aux(&mut index_heap, i, cmp, &SHUFFLED_INTS); | |
| } | |
| let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(index_heap.len()); | |
| while let Some(i) | |
| = heap_pop_with_aux(&mut index_heap, cmp, &SHUFFLED_INTS) { | |
| result.push(SHUFFLED_INTS[i]); | |
| } | |
| assert_eq!(result, ORDERED_INTS); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_pushpop() { | |
| let mut heap = vec![5, 8, 1, 4, 2]; | |
| heapify(&mut heap); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop(&mut heap, 0), 0); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop(&mut heap, 7), 1); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop(&mut heap, 7), 2); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop(&mut heap, 7), 4); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop(&mut heap, 7), 5); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop(&mut heap, 7), 7); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop(&mut heap, 7), 7); | |
| assert_eq!(heap.len(), 5); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_pushpop_with() { | |
| let mut heap = vec![5, 8, 1, 4, 2]; | |
| let cmp = |a: &i32, b: &i32| b.cmp(a); // Make it a max heap. | |
| heapify_with(&mut heap, cmp); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop_with(&mut heap, 0, cmp), 8); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop_with(&mut heap, 7, cmp), 7); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop_with(&mut heap, 2, cmp), 5); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop_with(&mut heap, 2, cmp), 4); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop_with(&mut heap, 2, cmp), 2); | |
| assert_eq!(heap.len(), 5); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_pushpop_with_aux() { | |
| let values = [5, 8, 1, 4, 2]; | |
| let mut index_heap = [1, 4, 3, 0, 2]; | |
| let cmp = |a: &usize, b: &usize, x: &[i32]| x[*a].cmp(&x[*b]); | |
| heapify_with_aux(&mut index_heap, cmp, &values); | |
| // Note that values on heap are indexes of `values`. | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop_with_aux(&mut index_heap, 0, cmp, &values), 2); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_pushpop_with_aux(&mut index_heap, 3, cmp, &values), 4); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_replace() { | |
| let mut heap = [5, 8, 1, 4, 2]; | |
| heapify(&mut heap); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_replace(&mut heap, 0), 1); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_replace(&mut heap, 7), 0); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_replace(&mut heap, 7), 2); | |
| heap.sort(); | |
| assert_eq!(heap, [4, 5, 7, 7, 8]); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_replace_with() { | |
| let mut heap = [5, 8, 1, 4, 2]; | |
| let cmp = |a: &i32, b: &i32| a.cmp(b); | |
| heapify_with(&mut heap, cmp); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_replace_with(&mut heap, 0, cmp), 1); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_replace_with(&mut heap, 7, cmp), 0); | |
| assert_eq!(heap_replace_with(&mut heap, 7, cmp), 2); | |
| heap.sort(); | |
| assert_eq!(heap, [4, 5, 7, 7, 8]); | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_heap_replace_with_aux() { | |
| let values = [5, 8, 1, 4, 2]; | |
| let cmp = |a: &usize, b: &usize, x: &[i32]| x[*a].cmp(&x[*b]); | |
| let mut index_heap = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]; | |
| heapify_with_aux(&mut index_heap, cmp, &values); | |
| // values[0] == 5. Should get 2 back (values[2] == 1). | |
| let i = heap_replace_with_aux(&mut index_heap, 0, cmp, &values); | |
| assert_eq!(i, 2); | |
| assert_eq!(values[i], 1); | |
| // values[3] == 5. Should get back 4 (values[4] == 2). | |
| let i = heap_replace_with_aux(&mut index_heap, 3, cmp, &values); | |
| assert_eq!(i, 4); | |
| assert_eq!(values[i], 2); | |
| } | |
| } |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment