Date checked: 2026-01-27
Verdict legend: ✅ Verified |
| ID | 要点 | 结论 | 证据与说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 需有“是否为 HCSA licensable service”的判定流程;若属 licensable 则须持有效许可并遵守许可条件与 Codes of Practice | 来源仅明确 HCSA licensees 必须遵守 HCSA/法规/许可条件/Codes of Practice,但未要求建立“判定流程”。1 | |
| A2 | 非 HCSA licensee 禁止用“treat/治疗”;避免用“doctor/医生”暗示医师身份 | ✅ Verified | MOH 明确“treat”限制适用于所有非 HCSA licensees,并说明“doctor”称谓保护适用于所有非注册医疗从业者。2 |
| A3 | 若宣传/提供 licensable healthcare service,广告主体必须是 HCSA licensee 或 authorised person | ✅ Verified | FAQ 明确仅 HCSA licensee 或其 authorised person 可广告 licensable services。3 |
| A4 | 对外陈述不得虚假/误导(学历、培训、经验、成功率、费用等) | ✅ Verified | SAC Public Statements 禁止虚假/误导性陈述并列举学历/培训/成功率/费用等类别。4 |
| A5 | 不得向当前来访者索取 testimonials | ✅ Verified | SPS 10.4 明确不得向当前客户或其亲友索取 testimonials。5 |
| A6 | 跨境/远程服务需告知适用法律与争议解决条款 | ✅ Verified | SAC “Applicable Law” 明确跨境 counselling 适用法律、保密与争议解决等需在服务前告知。6 |
| A7 | 远程 counselling 需身份核验 + 技术方式知情同意 + 风险与替代方案告知 | ✅ Verified | SAC 要求跨境/技术辅导前核验身份并取得技术使用同意;并要求告知技术风险与替代方式。64 |
| A8 | 收费透明且无 fee sharing | ✅ Verified | SAC 要求公开费用结构并禁止 fee sharing。7 |
| A9 | 需建立营销合规审查机制(审查/抽检/处置闭环) | SPS/SAC 只给“不得虚假/误导、广告合规”的原则,未要求内部审查机制或抽检闭环。45 |
| ID | 要点 | 结论 | 证据与说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 同意书写明保密义务与例外 | ✅ Verified | SAC Confidentiality 4.1–4.3 规定保密与例外(法律要求/保护第三方)。8 |
| B2 | 高风险情境强调保密限制 | ✅ Verified | SPS High Risk 4.7(c) 要求向来访者澄清保密限制与何时披露。9 |
| B3 | 记录安全(访问控制/防未授权访问) | ✅ Verified | SAC Records 5.1 要求确保记录安全且无未授权访问。8 |
| B4 | 记录保存 ≥3 年 | ✅ Verified | SPS Record Keeping 7.1(c) 明确记录至少保留三年或更久。10 |
| B5 | 记录销毁需审慎判断未来可能需要 | ✅ Verified | SAC 5.3 要求销毁记录前慎重考虑未来可能需要。8 |
| B6 | 数据泄露通报:尽快且不迟于 3 个日历日,并通知受影响个人 | ✅ Verified | PDPC 页面与指南均给出 3 个日历日通报要求,并要求通知受影响个人。1112 |
| B7 | 保护义务与保留限制:定期复查、避免无限期保存 | PDPC 指引明确保护义务与保留限制,并强调定期复查、非必要不保存;但未明确“心理咨询数据需更高保护等级”。13 | |
| B8 | 跨境/海外云传输合规(评估/合同/告知) | 指引明确 Transfer Limitation:不得随意跨境传输;但未规定“数据流图/供应商条款/评估与同意书结构”的具体做法。13 |
| ID | 要点 | 结论 | 证据与说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 知情同意覆盖:性质/流程、风险、退出权、记录/数据、费用等 | ✅ Verified | SPS 4.1(a) 列出服务性质、风险、退出权、记录方式、费用等要素。14 |
| C2 | 未成年人/无行为能力成年人需监护人同意 | ✅ Verified | SAC 2.2 明确需监护人或适当人士同意。7 |
| C3 | 来访者可终止服务;机构有终止/转介流程 | ✅ Verified | SAC 2.1 确认终止权利;5.2–5.4 规定终止/转介处理。715 |
| C4 | 咨询师无法提供帮助时须转介或终止 | ✅ Verified | SAC 5.2 要求无法专业协助时转介或终止,并在拒绝替代方案时终止关系。15 |
| C5 | 终止前提供预终止支持并促进转接 | ✅ Verified | SAC 5.4 要求终止前提供预终止支持与转介。15 |
| C6 | (已划线)禁止与当前来访者及其家庭成员发生性/浪漫关系;终止后 ≥5 年内不得发生性关系 | ✅ Verified | SAC 3.1–3.3 明确禁止当前关系与五年限制。7 |
| C7 | 双重关系与利益冲突申报/处置机制 | ✅ Verified | SAC 2.7 禁止双重关系;SPS 2.4/2.5 规定多重关系与冲突处理。1516 |
| C8 | 录音/录像需事先征得许可 | ✅ Verified | SAC 3.2 明确录音需事先许可。17 |
| C9 | 咨询环境保护身份与隐私 | ✅ Verified | SAC 3.3 要求咨询环境保护身份与隐私。17 |
| C10 | 儿童/脆弱人群有充分提问与澄清机会 | ✅ Verified | SPS 4.1(e) 要求给儿童与脆弱成人充分提问/澄清机会。18 |
| ID | 要点 | 结论 | 证据与说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1-1 | 需清晰“角色与服务范围”声明并与训练匹配 | SAC/SPS强调不得夸大资格与须在胜任力范围内执业,但未明确要求“角色/服务范围声明”。814 | |
| D1-2 | 不得超出胜任力执业;超出须转介/督导升级 | ✅ Verified | SAC 2.1–2.3 要求仅在胜任力范围内执业并转介;SPS 5.1 同样强调边界。89 |
| D1-3 | 实习生服务需告知且在督导下工作 | ✅ Verified | SAC 2.5 明确实习生需告知并在督导下工作。8 |
| D2-1 | 宣称 RegCLR 需有有效注册证明 | 宪章仅规定注册者可使用 RegCLR 后缀,未明确“对外宣称必须出示证明”。19 | |
| D2-2 | 600 小时 counselling(2–3 年内完成);视频最多 300 小时 | ✅ Verified | SAC 5.2.2(iv) 明确 600 小时与视频上限。19 |
| D2-3 | 督导比率 ≥1:10 | ✅ Verified | SAC 5.2.2(iii)/(iv) 明确 1 小时督导/10 小时实践。19 |
| D2-4 | 续期:每 2 年 ≥50 CPD + ≥400 临床小时,证据可抽查 | ✅ Verified | SAC 5.3.1–5.3.3 规定续期周期、CPD 50h、临床 400h,且证据可被要求提交。1920 |
| D2-5 | 注册/续期需 PI 保险证据 | ✅ Verified | SAC 5.5.1 要求专业责任险证据。20 |
| D3-1 | 全体人员需有明确督导安排(频率/形式/责任人/记录) | SAC 规定督导比率;NHS 标准仅强调“trained and supervised”。未具体到频率/记录机制。1921 | |
| D3-2 | 督导含 outcomes-focused 复盘(个案/伦理/边界) | NHS 标准明确 outcomes‑focused supervision,但未提及伦理/边界/个案讨论细节。21 | |
| D3-3 | 督导者需接受督导方法训练并持续进修 | ✅ Verified | SAC 3.2 要求督导者接受督导训练并持续进修。17 |
| ID | 要点 | 结论 | 证据与说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1-1 | PHQ-4 初筛:子量表≤2→自助;任一≥3→PHQ‑9/GAD‑7 | ✅ Verified | MOH 流程图明确 PHQ‑4 阈值与后续量表。22 |
| E1-2 | PHQ‑9/GAD‑7 分层阈值(Tier 2/3/4) | ✅ Verified | MOH 表格给出 PHQ‑9 与 GAD‑7 Tier cut-offs。22 |
| E1-3 | C‑SSRS 触发:Q9≥1 或总分≥20;或临床怀疑 | ✅ Verified | MOH 表 5 与抑郁流程备注明确触发条件与临床判断。2324 |
| E1-4 | 仅 PHQ‑4/PHQ‑9/GAD‑7/C‑SSRS 用于分层;WHODAS 不用于 triage | ✅ Verified | MOH Principle 4 + Note 明确 WHODAS 不用于分层,仅用于更深评估。25 |
| E2-1 | Tier2 遇到 Tier4 必须转介/升级;red flags 可直接 Tier4 | MOH 说明:Tier2 遇到 Tier4 转介至 Tier3 进一步评估;若 red flags 则直接 Tier4。与“必转 Tier4”不一致。24 | |
| E2-2 | 危机响应流程(自杀/自伤/他伤/虐待),含 24/7 路径 | MOH 红旗表提供紧急处置(警察/救护车/IMH/通知家属/热线),但未明确“24/7”或“虐待”流程细则。26 | |
| E2-3 | 持续风险评估 + 熟悉 mandatory reporting(如虐待) | ✅ Verified | SPS 4.7 要求持续评估与熟悉强制报告(含虐待)。9 |
| E2-4 | 偏离阈值需记录“临床判断”理由 | MOH 强调应依专业判断/临床裁量,但未明确“必须记录理由”。24 |
| ID | 要点 | 结论 | 证据与说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1-1 | 至少基线 + 结案 outcome(PHQ‑9/GAD‑7;必要时 WHODAS) | ✅ Verified | MOH Table 5 规定基线与结案 timepoints,并包含 WHODAS。23 |
| F1-2 | session‑by‑session 常规 outcome 监测 | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准明确每次会话常规 outcome 监测。21 |
| F1-3 | outcome paired scores 完整率(>98% 标杆) | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准称 session‑by‑session 体系使 >98% 个案有 outcome 数据。21 |
| F2-1 | caseness cut‑off:PHQ‑9 ≥10;GAD‑7 ≥8 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual Table 9 给出阈值。27 |
| F2-2 | Reliable improvement / deterioration 定义 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual 明确 improvement(无可靠恶化)与 deterioration(可靠恶化)的定义。2829 |
| F2-3 | Reliable recovery = recovery + reliable improvement | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual 明确可靠康复需同时满足恢复与可靠改善。28 |
| F2-4 | Reliable change thresholds:PHQ‑9 ≥6;GAD‑7 ≥4 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual Table 9 可靠变化阈值。27 |
| F2-5 | 缺失结案数据不计 recovered | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual 指出缺失结案数据的个案不计 recovered(demonstrated recovery)。28 |
| F3-1 | 等待时间指标(Referral→first appointment) | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准以“转介→首次会面”衡量等待时间标准。21 |
| F3-2 | 目标:75% 在 6 周内;95% 在 18 周内 | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准明确 6/18 周等待时间标准。21 |
| F4-1 | PEQ 在结案或倒数第二次收集,且不在治疗师面前填写 | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准明确 PEQ 收集时点与保密要求。21 |
| F4-2 | course of treatment 至少两次会话(含“assessment and treatment”/“treatment”) | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准明确 course of treatment 的编码口径。21 |
| ID | 要点 | 结论 | 证据与说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 治理结构(clinical lead/质量负责人/责任链) | ❌ Not found | NHS 标准强调数据/监督,但未要求具体“治理角色与责任链”;SPS Avoiding Harm 仅要求记录与咨询。2116 |
| G2 | 投诉与事件处理流程(分级/时限/调查/CAPA) | ❌ Not found | 所引来源未明确要求投诉处理流程或 CAPA。2116 |
| G3 | 风险事件复盘并改进 SOP | SPS 高风险要求持续评估与法律披露,但未明确“复盘”与 SOP 改进。9 | |
| G4 | outcome 定期复盘(团队/治疗师维度) | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准指出 outcomes framework 用于监督与改进服务表现。21 |
| G5 | 公共透明度(对外发布 outcome) | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准明确服务 outcome 公开发布以促进透明度与问责。21 |
| G6 | 跨提供者协作与避免重复填写 | ✅ Verified | MOH Principle 2 Note 要求多机构协调并共享结果以避免重复测量。25 |
| 条目 | 结论 | 证据 |
|---|---|---|
| PHQ‑4 初筛 | ✅ Verified | MOH 流程图明确 PHQ‑4 初筛。22 |
| 抑郁子量表 ≤2 且 焦虑子量表 ≤2 → 自助资源 | ✅ Verified | MOH 流程图明确 ≤2 时可自助。22 |
| 任一子量表 ≥3 → PHQ‑9 / GAD‑7 | ✅ Verified | MOH 流程图明确 ≥3 转入 PHQ‑9/GAD‑7。22 |
| PHQ‑9 分层 | ✅ Verified | MOH 表格提供分层 cut‑offs。22 |
| 5–9:Tier 2 | ✅ Verified | 同上。22 |
| 10–19:Tier 3 | ✅ Verified | 同上。22 |
| 20–27:Tier 4 | ✅ Verified | 同上。22 |
| GAD‑7 分层 | ✅ Verified | MOH 表格提供分层 cut‑offs。22 |
| 5–9:Tier 2 | ✅ Verified | 同上。22 |
| 10–14:Tier 3 | ✅ Verified | 同上。22 |
| 15–21:Tier 4 | ✅ Verified | 同上。22 |
| C‑SSRS 触发 | ✅ Verified | MOH 明确 C‑SSRS 触发条件。2324 |
| PHQ‑9 Q9 ≥1 或总分 ≥20 → 施测 | ✅ Verified | MOH 表 5 与抑郁流程均列明。2324 |
| 临床怀疑自杀/自伤风险 → 施测(即使 Q9=0) | ✅ Verified | MOH “To note” 明确临床判断触发。24 |
| WHODAS 2.0 | ✅ Verified | MOH Principle 4 说明 WHODAS 定位。25 |
| WHODAS 不用于分层,可用于更深评估 | ✅ Verified | MOH Principle 4 + Note。25 |
| 条目 | 结论 | 证据 |
|---|---|---|
| PHQ‑9 ≥10 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual Table 9。27 |
| GAD‑7 ≥8 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual Table 9。27 |
| PHQ‑9 变化 ≥6 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual Table 9。27 |
| GAD‑7 变化 ≥4 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual Table 9。27 |
| Reliable improvement 定义 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual 可靠改善定义。28 |
| Reliable deterioration 定义 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual 可靠恶化定义。29 |
| Reliable recovery 定义 | ✅ Verified | NHS Manual 可靠康复定义。28 |
| 75%:6 周内首次会面 | ✅ Verified | NHS 服务标准等待时间。21 |
| 95%:18 周内首次会面 | ✅ Verified | NHS 服务标准等待时间。21 |
| 期望:≥67% reliably improve;≥48% reliably recover | ✅ Verified | NHS 服务标准“Getting as many people better”期望值。21 |
| 数据完整率:session‑by‑session 可达 >98% | ✅ Verified | NHS 服务标准提到 >98% outcome 完整率。21 |
| 条目 | 结论 | 证据 |
|---|---|---|
| 抑郁:PHQ‑9(全体默认) | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准 ADSM/Measures 说明 PHQ‑9 为默认抑郁量表。21 |
| 焦虑:GAD‑7(默认) | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准说明 GAD‑7 为默认焦虑量表。21 |
| 明确焦虑障碍→用 ADSM 替换(PTSD=PCL‑5、社交焦虑=SPIN、惊恐=PDSS、强迫=OCI 等) | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准 ADSM 表列出对应量表。21 |
| 功能:WSAS | ✅ Verified | NHS 标准 “Work and social adjustment scale (WSAS)” 说明其用于干扰程度监测。21 |
| 条目 | 结论 | 证据 |
|---|---|---|
| EPPP Part 1:225 题(175 计分 + 50 预试题),8 大内容域 | ✅ Verified | EPPP Handbook 明确题量与 8 个内容域。30 |
| EPPP Part 2:170 题(130 计分 + 40 预试题),6 大技能域 | ✅ Verified | EPPP Handbook 明确题量与 6 个技能域。30 |
| NCE:200 题(160 计分 + 40 不计分),3 小时 45 分 | ✅ Verified | NCE Content Outline 给出题量与时长。31 |
| NCE 内容域含:职业伦理、评估/测试、干预技能、治疗计划、核心咨询特质等 | ✅ Verified | NCE Content Outline 的 6 大域覆盖上述内容。32 |
| 样题风格:如 CBT 应用、治疗联盟(handbook 附录示例) | ✅ Verified | NCE Handbook 附录样题包含 CBT 与治疗联盟示例。33 |
Footnotes
-
“Summary of requirements”,
https://www.hcsa.gov.sg/about-us/2-summary-of-requirements/, “Licensees must comply with all requirements… Codes of Practice”. ↩ -
“HCSA and the Regulation of Psychologists”,
https://www.moh.gov.sg/newsroom/hcsa-and-the-regulation-of-psychologists/, Answer paragraph on “treat” restriction and “doctor” title protection (page text snapshot). ↩ -
“FAQs on HCS (Advertisement) Regulations_1.1”,
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/7/1d84b66a-5625-49a2-8c0e-e06eea4ed9fd/FAQs%20on%20HCS%20%28Advertisement%29%20Regulations_1.1.pdf, p.6. ↩ -
SAC “Code of Ethics”,
https://sacsingapore.org/wp-content/uploads/2025.01-Jan-SAC-Code-of-Ethics-v2.pdf, p.7 (technology risks/alternatives; public statements not deceptive). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 -
SPS “Code of Ethics 1st Edition”,
https://singaporepsychologicalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SPS-Code-of-Ethics-1st-Edition.pdf, p.26 (advertising/testimonials). ↩ ↩2 -
SAC “Code of Ethics”,
https://sacsingapore.org/wp-content/uploads/2025.01-Jan-SAC-Code-of-Ethics-v2.pdf, p.6 (cross‑border counselling: applicable law; identity verification & consent). ↩ ↩2 -
SAC “Code of Ethics” (v2 Jan 2025),
https://sacsingapore.org/wp-content/uploads/2025.01-Jan-SAC-Code-of-Ethics-v2.pdf, p.1 (legal relationship, minors, prohibited relationships, fees, fee sharing). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 -
SAC “Code of Ethics”,
https://sacsingapore.org/wp-content/uploads/2025.01-Jan-SAC-Code-of-Ethics-v2.pdf, p.3 (confidentiality, records security, records destruction, competence, interns). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 -
SPS “Code of Ethics”,
https://singaporepsychologicalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SPS-Code-of-Ethics-1st-Edition.pdf, p.17 (High Risk: continuous assessment, confidentiality limits, mandatory reporting; competence boundary). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 -
SPS “Code of Ethics”,
https://singaporepsychologicalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SPS-Code-of-Ethics-1st-Edition.pdf, p.20 (records kept minimally 3 years). ↩ -
PDPC “Required to Notify the PDPC”,
https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/report-data-breach/before-you-report-a-data-breach-3/info, page text (3 calendar days; notify affected individuals). ↩ -
PDPC “Guide on Managing and Notifying Data Breaches under the PDPA”,
https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/files/pdpc/pdf-files/other-guides/guide-on-managing-and-notifying-data-breaches-under-the-pdpa-15-mar-2021.pdf, p.38 (timeline: within 3 calendar days). ↩ -
PDPC “Advisory Guidelines for the Healthcare Sector (Sep 2023)”,
https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/files/pdpc/pdf-files/advisory-guidelines/advisory-guidelines-for-the-healthcare-sector-sep-2023.pdf, pp.23–24 (Protection/Retention Limitation/Transfer Limitation obligations). ↩ ↩2 -
SPS “Code of Ethics”,
https://singaporepsychologicalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SPS-Code-of-Ethics-1st-Edition.pdf, p.15 (Informed Consent to Therapy elements). ↩ ↩2 -
SAC “Code of Ethics”,
https://sacsingapore.org/wp-content/uploads/2025.01-Jan-SAC-Code-of-Ethics-v2.pdf, p.2 (referrals/termination; dual relationships). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 -
SPS “Code of Ethics”,
https://singaporepsychologicalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SPS-Code-of-Ethics-1st-Edition.pdf, pp.10–11 (multiple relationships; conflict of interest; sexual intimacies). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 -
SAC “Code of Ethics”,
https://sacsingapore.org/wp-content/uploads/2025.01-Jan-SAC-Code-of-Ethics-v2.pdf, p.4 (supervisor training; recording permission; environment privacy). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 -
SPS “Code of Ethics”,
https://singaporepsychologicalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SPS-Code-of-Ethics-1st-Edition.pdf, p.16 (children/vulnerable adults opportunity for questions). ↩ -
SAC “Constitution v1.2 (2025.04.25)”,
https://sacsingapore.org/wp-content/uploads/2025.04.25-Apr-SAC-Constitution-v1.2.pdf, p.4 (RegCLR; supervision ratio; 600 hours; video limit; CPD 50h). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 -
SAC “Constitution v1.2 (2025.04.25)”,
https://sacsingapore.org/wp-content/uploads/2025.04.25-Apr-SAC-Constitution-v1.2.pdf, p.5 (400 clinical hours; PI requirement). ↩ ↩2 -
NHS England “Service standards (NHS Talking Therapies)”,
https://www.england.nhs.uk/mental-health/adults/nhs-talking-therapies/service-standards/, sections “Data and performance”, “Programme aspirations”, “Patient experience”, “The importance of data”, “ADSM”, “WSAS”. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 ↩14 ↩15 ↩16 ↩17 ↩18 ↩19 ↩20 -
MOH “Practice Guide for Tiered Care Model…”,
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/95/1dce7b4e-9848-4d0d-b709-49ef69a2fb3b/Practice%20Guide%20for%20Tiered%20Care%20Model%20for%20Mental%20Health_Final.pdf, p.26 (PHQ‑4 flowchart & tier cut‑offs). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 -
MOH “Practice Guide for Tiered Care Model…”,
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/95/1dce7b4e-9848-4d0d-b709-49ef69a2fb3b/Practice%20Guide%20for%20Tiered%20Care%20Model%20for%20Mental%20Health_Final.pdf, p.24 (Table 5 timepoints; C‑SSRS trigger). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 -
MOH “Practice Guide for Tiered Care Model…”,
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/95/1dce7b4e-9848-4d0d-b709-49ef69a2fb3b/Practice%20Guide%20for%20Tiered%20Care%20Model%20for%20Mental%20Health_Final.pdf, p.27 (C‑SSRS triggers; clinical judgement; Tier2 referral and red flags). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 -
MOH “Practice Guide for Tiered Care Model…”,
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/95/1dce7b4e-9848-4d0d-b709-49ef69a2fb3b/Practice%20Guide%20for%20Tiered%20Care%20Model%20for%20Mental%20Health_Final.pdf, p.25 (Principle 2 coordination; Principle 4 WHODAS not for triage). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 -
MOH “Practice Guide for Tiered Care Model…”,
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/95/1dce7b4e-9848-4d0d-b709-49ef69a2fb3b/Practice%20Guide%20for%20Tiered%20Care%20Model%20for%20Mental%20Health_Final.pdf, p.22 (Table 4 red flags & urgent actions). ↩ -
NHS “Talking Therapies Manual v7.1”,
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/nhs-talking-therapies-manual-v7.1-updated.pdf, p.46 (Table 9 caseness & reliable change index). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 -
NHS “Talking Therapies Manual v7.1”,
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/nhs-talking-therapies-manual-v7.1-updated.pdf, pp.52–53 (recovery definition; reliable improvement; missing post‑treatment data = not recovered). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 -
NHS “Talking Therapies Manual v7.1”,
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/nhs-talking-therapies-manual-v7.1-updated.pdf, p.55 (reliable deterioration definition). ↩ ↩2 -
ASPPB “EPPP Candidate Handbook”,
https://asppb.net/wp-content/uploads/EPPP-Candidate-Handbook.pdf, p.5 (Part 1 & 2 domains and question counts). ↩ ↩2 -
NBCC “NCE Content Outline”,
https://nbcc.org/assets/exam/nce_content_outline.pdf, p.2 (200 questions; 160 scored/40 unscored; 3h45). ↩ -
NBCC “NCE Content Outline”,
https://nbcc.org/assets/exam/nce_content_outline.pdf, p.3 (domain list: ethics, assessment, treatment planning, counseling skills, core attributes, etc.). ↩ -
NBCC “NCE Applicant Handbook”,
https://nbcc.org/assets/exam/handbooks/nce_applicant_handbook_for_national_certification.pdf, p.30 (sample questions incl. CBT and therapeutic alliance). ↩