B - Begin Fresh R - Right Model U - Use a Critic Persona T - Third Party Framing A - Ask Specific Questions L - Let It Grade Itself
The problem is AI wants to please you. It will return something like: "This has potential! Here's how to make it even better..."
- Before you pitch a proposal to a client or boss.
- Before you send a negotiation, cold pitch, or difficult news.
- Before you launch a product, service, or campaign.
- Before you commit to contracts, vendors, or major expenses.
- Begin Fresh - Start with a clean slate
- Ralph Wiggum
- ChatGPT
- Temporary chat
- Blocks long-term memory
- Custom instructions still apply
- Claude
- Incognito mode
- Click the ghost icon
- Bypasses all saved memory
- Gemini
- Temporary Chat
- Personal use toggle
- Work already private
- AI Memory
- You chat more
- It learns patterns
- Less honest feedback
- It adapts to please
- Devils Advocate
- Challenge with counterarguments
- Red team
- Hunt for weaknesses on purpose
- Gordon Ramsay
- Surgical
- No sugarcoating
Act as a devil's advocate. Challenge this idea by pointing out flaws, counterarguments, miussing evidence, and unintended consequences. Your goal is to create doubt.
Act as a red team reviewer. Your job is to find and poke holes in (X)--expose flaws, loopholes, and things that arent good enough by purposefully hunting for them.
Give this the Gordon Ramsay treatment. Be surgical. What's wrong, what's lazy, and what needs to be completely redone? Make sure the feedback is specific and actionable.
AI doesn't try to protect your ego.
A coworker has this idea and asked for honest feedback. Help identify the weaknesses so they don't waste time on something flawed. Here's the idea: (X).
A random person asked for feedback on their business plan.
Someone on my team proposed...
A founder I'm advising is considering...
- What's the weakest part that's easy to miss?
- What would a skeptical investor say is the biggest risk?
- What might customers find frustrating about this?
- If this fails in siz months, what's the likely reason?
After all those, AI might still hold back criticism Ask AI to grade itself. After self-critique its much sharper. AI switches from "be helpful" mode to "find problems" mode.
Analyze that response. Rate it from 1 to 100 for how genuinely critical and useful it was. Identify the three weakest points, then rewrite the feedback fixing those weaknesses.
Settings -> Personalization -> Custom Instructions
Prioritize substance over compliments. Never soften creiticism. If an idea has holes, say so directly--"This won't scale becauseX" is better than "Have you considered...". Challenge assumptions. Point out errors. Useful feedback matters more than comfortable feedback.