Complete reference for The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (21st ed. 2020).
[Case Name], [Vol.] [Reporter] [First Page], [Pinpoint] ([Court] [Year]).
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| U.S. Supreme Court | Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954). |
| Circuit Court | Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100, 105 (9th Cir. 2007). |
| District Court | Doe v. Roe, 200 F. Supp. 3d 50, 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). |
| State Court | People v. Smith, 50 N.Y.2d 100, 405 N.E.2d 123 (1980). |
| Unpublished | Smith v. Jones, No. 20-1234, 2021 WL 123456, at *3 (9th Cir. Jan. 15, 2021). |
Party Name Rules:
- Omit "The" as first word
- Omit given names of individuals
- Omit "Inc.", "Ltd.", "L.L.C." unless only identifier
- Abbreviate per Table T6: & (and), Ass'n, Bros., Co., Corp., Inc., Ltd., No.
- "United States" → "U.S." (as party)
Subsequent History:
Smith v. Jones, 500 F.3d 100 (9th Cir. 2007), aff'd, 555 U.S. 100 (2008).
Doe v. Roe, 400 F.3d 50 (5th Cir. 2005), rev'd, 550 U.S. 50 (2007).
[Title] [Code] § [Section] ([Year]).
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Federal (U.S.C.) | 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018). |
| Multiple sections | 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983-1985 (2018). |
| Subsection | 42 U.S.C. § 1983(a)(1) (2018). |
| With supplement | 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018 & Supp. II 2020). |
| Popular name | Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2018). |
| State (CA) | Cal. Penal Code § 187 (West 2014). |
| State (TX) | Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 17.50 (West 2011). |
| Session law | Pub. L. No. 104-193, § 103, 110 Stat. 2105, 2112 (1996). |
Key Rules:
- Use § symbol with space before number (not "Section" or "Sec.")
- Use §§ for multiple sections
- Year = code edition year, NOT enactment year
- Prefer U.S.C. over U.S.C.A. or U.S.C.S.
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3.
U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1.
U.S. Const. pmbl.
Cal. Const. art. I, § 1.
No date for currently effective provisions.
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| C.F.R. | 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (2020). |
| Federal Register | 85 Fed. Reg. 12345 (Mar. 2, 2020) (to be codified at 17 C.F.R. pt. 240). |
| Proposed rule | 85 Fed. Reg. 12345 (proposed Mar. 2, 2020) (to be codified at 17 C.F.R. pt. 240). |
[Author], [TITLE] [Pinpoint] ([Edition] [Year]).
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Single author | Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law 45 (9th ed. 2014). |
| Two authors | William N. Eskridge, Jr. & Philip P. Frickey, Cases and Materials on Legislation 200 (5th ed. 2014). |
| Three+ authors | Erwin Chemerinsky et al., Constitutional Law 150 (6th ed. 2019). |
| Edited volume | The Federalist No. 78, at 464 (Alexander Hamilton) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961). |
| Chapter in collection | Kay Deaux & Brenda Major, A Social-Psychological Model of Gender, in Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference 89, 89 (Deborah L. Rhode ed., 1990). |
[Author], [Title], [Vol.] [JOURNAL] [First Page], [Pinpoint] ([Year]).
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Standard article | Cass R. Sunstein, On the Expressive Function of Law, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2021, 2030 (1996). |
| Student note | Jane Student, Note, The Future of Privacy, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 1000 (2020). |
| Student comment | Jane Student, Comment, On Jurisdiction, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 500 (2015). |
Common Journal Abbreviations (Table T13):
| Journal | Abbreviation |
|---|---|
| Harvard Law Review | Harv. L. Rev. |
| Yale Law Journal | Yale L.J. |
| Stanford Law Review | Stan. L. Rev. |
| Columbia Law Review | Colum. L. Rev. |
| University of Pennsylvania Law Review | U. Pa. L. Rev. |
[Author], [Title], [Publication], [Date], at [Page].
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Newspaper (print) | Adam Liptak, Court Ruling Could Reshape Healthcare, N.Y. Times, June 26, 2015, at A1. |
| Newspaper (online) | Adam Liptak, Court Ruling Could Reshape Healthcare, N.Y. Times (June 26, 2015), https://www.nytimes.com/... |
| Magazine | Jeffrey Toobin, The Obama Brief, New Yorker, Oct. 27, 2014, at 24. |
[Author], [Title], [WEBSITE] ([Date, Time]), [URL].
Example:
Eric Posner, *More on Section 7 of the Torture Convention*, Volokh Conspiracy (Jan. 29, 2009, 10:04 AM), http://www.volokh.com/2009/01/29/more-on-section-7-of-the-torture-convention/.
For sources likely to change:
[URL] (last visited [Date]).
Archived URLs (preferred for permanence):
https://perma.cc/XXXX-XXXX
Treaties:
[Name], [Parties], [Subdivision], [Date], [Source].
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Bilateral treaty | Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation, Japan-U.S., art. X, Apr. 2, 1953, 4 U.S.T. 2063. |
| NAFTA | North American Free Trade Agreement, U.S.-Can.-Mex., Dec. 17, 1992, 32 I.L.M. 289. |
United Nations:
U.N. GAOR, 56th Sess., 1st plen. mtg. at 3, U.N. Doc. A/56/PV.1 (Sept. 12, 2001).
Foreign Cases (Table T2):
Donoghue v. Stevenson, [1932] A.C. 562 (H.L.).
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Restatement | Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 (Am. L. Inst. 1981). |
| With comment | Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 cmt. a (Am. L. Inst. 1981). |
| UCC | U.C.C. § 2-201 (Am. L. Inst. & Unif. L. Comm'n 2017). |
| Model Rules | Model Rules of Pro. Conduct r. 1.6 (Am. Bar Ass'n 2020). |
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| House bill | H.R. 1234, 116th Cong. § 2 (2020). |
| Senate bill | S. 567, 116th Cong. (2019). |
| House report | H.R. Rep. No. 116-123, at 5 (2019). |
| Senate report | S. Rep. No. 116-45, at 10 (2020). |
| Conference report | H.R. Rep. No. 116-789 (Conf. Rep.), at 15 (2020). |
| Hearing | Cybersecurity Threats: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on Homeland Sec., 116th Cong. 25 (2020) (statement of Christopher Krebs). |
| Congressional Record | 165 Cong. Rec. S1234 (daily ed. Feb. 10, 2019) (statement of Sen. Smith). |
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Brief | Brief for Petitioner at 15, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (No. 1). |
| Transcript | Transcript of Oral Argument at 25, Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) (No. 08-205). |
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Black's Law | Black's Law Dictionary 1000 (11th ed. 2019). |
| Entry | Contract, Black's Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019). |
| Am. Jur. | 17A Am. Jur. 2d Contracts § 100 (2020). |
| C.J.S. | 17A C.J.S. Contracts § 200 (2019). |
Use when citing the same source as the immediately preceding citation with no intervening citations.
| Context | Form |
|---|---|
| Same page | Id. |
| Different page | Id. at 496. |
| Different section (statute) | Id. § 1985. |
Capitalization:
- Beginning of sentence: Id.
- After signal or mid-sentence: id.
NEVER use id. when:
- Intervening citation exists
- Prior footnote has multiple sources
- More than ~5 footnotes since full citation
[Author], supra note [#], at [Page].
Example:
Sunstein, supra note 1, at 2040.
NEVER use supra for:
- Cases (use case short form)
- Statutes (use statutory short form)
- Constitutions
- Regulations
[Party], [Vol.] [Reporter] at [Page].
| Context | Form |
|---|---|
| No intervening cites | Id. at 496. |
| Intervening cites | Brown, 347 U.S. at 497. |
| Ambiguous party | Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. at 498. |
| Context | Form |
|---|---|
| No intervening | Id. or Id. § 1985 |
| Same discussion | § 1983 |
| Named act | Civil Rights Act § 703 |
Define for long titles or multiple works by same author:
[Full Citation] [hereinafter [Short Name]].
...
[Short Name], supra note [#], at [Page].
Example:
1. Cass R. Sunstein, On the Expressive Function of Law, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2021 (1996) [hereinafter Sunstein, Expressive Function].
...
15. Sunstein, Expressive Function, supra note 1, at 2040.
| Signal | Use When | Parenthetical |
|---|---|---|
| [no signal] | Source directly states proposition | Optional |
| See | Source clearly supports but doesn't directly state | Recommended |
| E.g., | One of multiple sources directly stating proposition | Optional |
| See, e.g., | One of multiple sources supporting (not directly stating) | Recommended |
| Accord | Additional sources stating/supporting same proposition | Optional |
| See also | Additional helpful support | Recommended |
| Cf. | Supports proposition by analogy | Required |
| Signal | Use When | Parenthetical |
|---|---|---|
| Contra | Source directly states the opposite | Optional |
| But see | Source clearly supports contrary proposition | Recommended |
| But cf. | Source supports contrary by analogy | Required |
| Signal | Use When | Parenthetical |
|---|---|---|
| Compare X with Y | Sources illustrate through contrast | Required for both |
| See generally | Provides helpful background | Recommended |
In a single citation sentence: [no signal] → E.g., → Accord → See → See also → Cf. → Compare → Contra → But see → But cf. → See generally
| Source Type | Format |
|---|---|
| Case names | Italics: Brown v. Board |
| Book titles | SMALL CAPS: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW |
| Book authors | SMALL CAPS: RICHARD A. POSNER |
| Article titles | Italics: On the Expressive Function |
| Journal names | SMALL CAPS: U. PA. L. REV. |
| Newspaper names | Italics: N.Y. Times |
| Statutes | Roman: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Procedural phrases | Italics: aff'd, rev'd, cert. denied |
Court documents and legal memoranda use different typeface conventions:
- Generally no small caps
- Underlining may substitute for italics
- Consult Bluepages B2 for specific requirements
(en banc)
(per curiam)
(plurality opinion)
(Thomas, J., dissenting)
(Stevens, J., concurring in the judgment)
(5-4 decision)
Begin with present participle:
(holding that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal)
(finding no constitutional violation)
(noting the difficulty of the issue)
(rejecting defendant's argument)
Or quoted material:
("Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.")
- Weight of authority (en banc, per curiam)
- "Quoting" or "citing" information
- Explanatory parenthetical
Smith, 500 F.3d at 110 (en banc) (quoting Roe, 400 F.3d at 60) (holding that...).
Follows a textual sentence; capitalize signals at beginning:
The Constitution requires due process. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1.
Embedded within text; lowercase signals:
The Supreme Court has held, see Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), that separate is inherently unequal.
| Position | Punctuation |
|---|---|
| End of citation sentence | Period |
| Between citations (same sentence) | Semicolon |
| Citation clause (embedded) | Commas on both sides |
Within the same signal, cite in this order:
- Constitutions (federal, then state alphabetically)
- Statutes (federal, then state alphabetically)
- Treaties
- Cases
- Federal: Supreme Court → Courts of Appeals (by circuit) → District Courts (alphabetically by state)
- State: alphabetically by state, then by court hierarchy
- Within same court: reverse chronological (most recent first)
- Legislative materials
- Administrative and executive materials
- Secondary materials
| Court | Reporter |
|---|---|
| U.S. Supreme Court | U.S., S. Ct., L. Ed. |
| Circuit Courts | F., F.2d, F.3d, F.4th |
| District Courts | F. Supp., F. Supp. 2d, F. Supp. 3d |
| Court | Abbreviation |
|---|---|
| Court of Appeals | Cir. |
| District Court | D., S.D., E.D., N.D., W.D. |
| Bankruptcy Court | Bankr. |
| Action | Abbreviation |
|---|---|
| affirmed | aff'd |
| reversed | rev'd |
| certiorari denied | cert. denied |
| certiorari granted | cert. granted |
| vacated | vacated |
| overruled by | overruled by |
Jan., Feb., Mar., Apr., May, June, July, Aug., Sept., Oct., Nov., Dec.
| Error | Correct |
|---|---|
| 347 US 483 | 347 U.S. 483 |
| 500 F. 3d 100 | 500 F.3d 100 |
| (9th Cir. Ct. App. 2007) | (9th Cir. 2007) |
| (SDNY 2016) | (S.D.N.Y. 2016) |
| Error | Correct |
|---|---|
| Section 1983 | § 1983 |
| §1983 | § 1983 (space required) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1871) | 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) |
| Error | Correct |
|---|---|
| Supra for cases | Use case short form |
| Id. after intervening cite | Use full short form |
| Supra without note number | Sunstein, supra note 1 |
Before finalizing any citation:
- Source type identified correctly
- All elements present (volume, page, court, year)
- Abbreviations match Bluebook tables
- Pinpoint page included for specific propositions
- Typeface correct for document type (law review vs. practitioner)
- Signal accurately reflects source's relationship to proposition
- Parenthetical included when required (cf., compare)
- Short forms reference existing full citations
- Id. used only with no intervening citations
- Authorities ordered correctly within signals
Based on The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (21st ed. 2020)