Vegadodo (@vegadodo)
This might seriously fuck up repo history, so use at your own risk. Also, this might have some unintended side effects.
See how a minor change to your commit message style can make a difference.
git commit -m"<type>(<optional scope>): <description>" \ -m"<optional body>" \ -m"<optional footer>"
The following is the procedure I use on UNIX systems:
First, export all public certificates into a public keyring:
$ gpg --armor --export > pub.asc
Second, export all secret certificates into a secret keyring:
# Ubuntu
sudo apt-get install gpa seahorse
# MacOS with https://brew.sh/
When contributing to this repository, please first discuss the change you wish to make via issue, email, or any other method with the owners of this repository before making a change.
Please note we have a code of conduct, please follow it in all your interactions with the project.
There are certain files created by particular editors, IDEs, operating systems, etc., that do not belong in a repository. But adding system-specific files to the repo's .gitignore is considered a poor practice. This file should only exclude files and directories that are a part of the package that should not be versioned (such as the node_modules directory) as well as files that are generated (and regenerated) as artifacts of a build process.
All other files should be in your own global gitignore file:
.gitignore in your home directory and add any filepath patterns you want to ignore.Note: The specific name and path you choose aren't important as long as you configure git to find it, as shown below. You could substitute
.config/git/ignorefor.gitignorein your home directory, if you prefer.
| # Compiled source # | |
| ################### | |
| *.com | |
| *.class | |
| *.dll | |
| *.exe | |
| *.o | |
| *.so | |
| # Packages # |
GitHub supports several lightweight markup languages for documentation; the most popular ones (generally, not just at GitHub) are Markdown and reStructuredText. Markdown is sometimes considered easier to use, and is often preferred when the purpose is simply to generate HTML. On the other hand, reStructuredText is more extensible and powerful, with native support (not just embedded HTML) for tables, as well as things like automatic generation of tables of contents.
Every so often I have to restore my gpg keys and I'm never sure how best to do it. So, I've spent some time playing around with the various ways to export/import (backup/restore) keys.
cp ~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg /path/to/backups/
cp ~/.gnupg/secring.gpg /path/to/backups/
cp ~/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg /path/to/backups/