https://x.com/VictorTaelin/status/2001777678765129832
* ▐▛███▜▌ * Claude Code v2.0.72
* ▝▜█████▛▘ * Opus 4.5 · Claude Max
* ▘▘ ▝▝ * ~/vic/dev/hvm4-claude
> # Task 1: print unscoped lambdas and floating dups with matching names
In HVM4, lambdas can be unbound, meaning their variables occur outside of their
bodies, and dups "float" in the global heap, meaning they don't even have a
body. Because of that, variables that occur outside of their bodies are printed
as '_', which is wrong, and dups aren't even printed, at all.
For example, consider this new test, named snf_unscoped:
@main = λk.
! F = λx; // creates an unbound lam/var pair: F = λa.$x.a and x = $x
! K &L = k; // clones k with a &L label
#Tup{x, F, K₀, K₁, λv.v}
Currently, running it with `./clang/main bad.hvm4` results in:
λa.#Tup{_,λb.λc.b,a,a,λa.a}
This is wrong, since:
- the '_' variable is not matching the 'λc' lambda
- the dup node is not showing up
- it shows 'a' twice instead of the dup node vars
Instead, the correct output should've been:
λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
Notice that:
- each lam/dup-bound variable has a globally unique name (instead of being lexical)
- all visible dups are printed after the term
- λ-bound variables are lowercase (a, b, c, ... aa, ab, ...), dup-bound
variables are uppercase (A, B, C, ..., AA, AB, ...)
- unscoped variables work fine
To achieve that, we must modify the pretty printer to include a global variable
naming scheme, keyed by the location of λ bodies and dup exprs. That is,
whenever we find a VAR or LAM, we assign a fresh, globally unique name to the
pair, keyed by the LAM's body location (which is the val() of the VAR Term, or
the val() of the LAM Term - both coincide). That works because both the VAR and
the LAM store that same location on the val() field of their Terms. Then, we
just print the variable with that unique name, and the lambda with that name.
As for dups, since they *float* in the global scope, we must also *detect* dups
when we reach CO0/CO1 variables. When that happens, we set a globally unique
name for that dup (which will be used by the DUP, by the CO0, and by the CO1).
Just like LAM and VAR val() store the same value, CO0, CO1 and DUPs val() store
the same value, allowing us to use that value group the family under the same
id. Then, after a term is printed, we proceed to print all DUPs we discovered.
Note that this might, then, cause new DUPs to be discovered, so we just print
them later too, recursively. Just make sure we avoid loops (i.e., a DUP can only be
discovered once) and we're fine. Remember that we key DUP's by the location of
the dup'd expression, which is what is stored on CO0/CO1 variables.
# Task 2: print ALO's correctly.
Finally, ALO is, currently, not fully printed. your goal is to also print ALO's
correctly. to do so, include a new mode in the printer, named 'quoted', which
prints book terms. remember that book terms are slightly different from runtime
terms, since lams, vars, dups, co0/co1's, are *quoted*, instead of *linked*.
Book terms (parsed definitions) use de Bruijn indices and are immutable:
- VAR: ext = 0 ; val = bru_index
- CO_: ext = dup_label ; val = bru_index
- LAM: ext = bru_depth ; val = body_location
- DUP: ext = dup_label ; val = expr_location
Runtime terms (after ALO allocation) use heap locations:
- VAR : ext = 0 ; val = binding_lam_body_location
- CO_ : ext = dup_label ; val = binding_dup_expr_location
- LAM : ext = 0 ; val = body_location
- DUP : ext = 0 ; val = expr_location
your goal is to print ALO's as @{term}, where 'term' is the immutable book term,
with vars/co0s/co1s printed as their values on the alo_subst list, when
available. so, for example, if @foo = λx.λy.#Ctr{x,y}, then, applying @foo(1,2)
would be printed as:
@{λx.λy.#Ctr{x,y}}(1,2)
this would reduce to:
λx.λy.@{#Ctr{x,y}}(1,2)
which would reduce to:
λx.λy.@{#Ctr{1,2}}
(note that, here, the x and y variables are printed as 1 and 2, since these
substitutions are now available on the alo's subst list)
which would reduce to:
#Ctr{@{1},@{2}}
which would reduce to:
#Ctr{1,2}
your goal is to also implement an ALO printer that works that way.
after that, this new test, named snf_c2_k2:
@c2 = λs. !S0&C=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
@k2 = λs. !S0&K=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
@main = @c2(@k2)
should output *exactly*:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
# Task 3: modify snf() to have two modes
finally, we'll include a new parameter on snf(), named 'quoted', which, when set
to true, will substitute λ-bound vars by NAM's, which is the current behavior.
there will be a change though: when doing so, we return these lambdas with the
ext field set to the bruijn depth. in other words, we return "book lambdas"
instead of plain lambdas. this will ensure the pretty printer still prints them
matching their bound variables (otherwise, we could accidentally have a mismatch
between lambda name and its bound variable name, given that the bound variable
will be replaced by a NAM with the bruijn index, yet the new pretty printer
assigns an unique name to lambdas). pay attention to this detail.
when quoted is set to false on snf, it will NOT do that (new behavior). on the
collapse() function, we will use quoted mode, which preserves the current
behavior, and prevents tests from breaking. when the user runs a program without
collapsed mode, though (i.e., 'hvm4 my_program.hvm4'), we will use snf() with
quoted=false, resulting in a new behavior where programs are shown in their
interaction calculus form (like the 2 new tests above).
# Notes
after these changes, some tests will break, since we're changing how the printer
works. don't fix them yet. do NOT ATTEMPT TO FIX THEM. just let me know which
tests broke, and I'll let you know whether they're still correct or not (i.e.,
whether the problem is just the syntax changes, or if they broke for real).
that these new tests should NOT use collapsed mode. to configure that, we must
use a new syntax to define their expected outputs:
//!output_here
i.e., the "!" after "//" specifies that it is a non-collapsed test.
be extra careful to understand how variable substitution work before acting.
remember that the printer must chase substitutions. a substitution occurs when a
VAR, CO0 or CO1 point to a heap location which has a term with a sub bit set.
when that's the case, we must replace the var/co0/co1 by the target term, with
the sub bit cleared. when a VAR, CO0 or CO1 don't point to a heap location with
a sub bit set, then, they're just normal variables, and should be printed as
such. this is important when handling the subst list of ALO's. double check if
the terms in the ALO subst list have a sub bit set and, if so, clear it before
calling print; otherwise, we might accidentally pass a term with a sub bit set
to the print fn. this should NEVER happen. add an assert at the beginning of the
print_at call to ensure this, indeed, doesn't happen. if it happens, that means
something else is wrong with the code.
now, implement the 3 tasks above. do not run any of the old tests. run the two
new tests with non-collapsed mode. let me know if the output matches. if you
find any issue or blocker, do NOT attempt to solve it yourself. just get back to
me and ask clarification questions.
make your code short and elegant. follow the repository style guide. avoid
repeated or duplicate code. abstract common patterns out. THIS IS IMPORTANT.
ultrathink
∴ Thinking…
Let me understand the task at hand:
1. Task 1: Print unscoped lambdas and floating dups with matching names
- Currently, variables outside their lambda bodies are printed as '_'
- Dups aren't printed at all
- Need to implement a global variable naming scheme keyed by heap locations
- Lambda-bound vars should be lowercase (a, b, c, ...), dup-bound vars should be uppercase (A, B, C, ...)
- After printing the term, print all discovered DUPs
2. Task 2: Print ALO's correctly
- Need a 'quoted' mode for printing book terms
- Book terms use de Bruijn indices, runtime terms use heap locations
- ALO should be printed as @{term} where term is the immutable book term with substitutions applied
3. Task 3: Modify snf() to have two modes
- quoted=true: Current behavior (substitute λ-bound vars by NAMs), but return "book lambdas" with ext field set to bruijn
depth
- quoted=false: New behavior, doesn't substitute
- collapse() uses quoted mode, direct run uses non-quoted mode
Let me first explore the codebase to understand the current implementation.
⏺ I'll start by exploring the codebase to understand the current implementation of the printer, term representation, and SNF
evaluator.
⎿ Initializing…
⎿ Error: InputValidationError: Task failed due to the following issue:
The required parameter `description` is missing
⏺ Read(test/snf_unscoped.hvm4)
⎿ Read 6 lines
⏺ Read(clang/STYLE.md)
⎿ Read 155 lines
∴ Thinking…
Let me explore the printer and term representation more.
⏺ Explore(explore printer and term structure)
⎿ Prompt:
Explore the HVM4 codebase in clang/ to understand:
1. The print/show functions - how terms are currently printed (look for print*.c, show*.c files)
2. How VAR, LAM, CO0, CO1, DUP, and ALO terms are handled in printing
3. The term representation (term_tag, term_val, term_ext, term_sub)
4. How substitutions are chased/resolved
Be thorough and provide file paths with line numbers for key code.
⎿ > Explore the HVM4 codebase in clang/ to understand:
1. The print/show functions - how terms are currently printed (look for print*.c, show*.c files)
2. How VAR, LAM, CO0, CO1, DUP, and ALO terms are handled in printing
3. The term representation (term_tag, term_val, term_ext, term_sub)
4. How substitutions are chased/resolved
Be thorough and provide file paths with line numbers for key code.
⎿ Search(pattern: "clang/**/*.c")
⎿ Bash(find /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang -type f -name "*.c" | head -30)
Waiting…
⎿ ⎿ Found 100 files
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/hvm4.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/names.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/b64_to_letter.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/to_str.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/is_char.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/letter_to_b64.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/is_init.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_red.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_red.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_mat.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_num_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_val.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_mat_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_var.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/uns.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/_.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_dup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_node.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_num_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_any.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_node.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_use.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_cop.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_val.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_mat_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_num_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/mat_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/ext.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/unmark.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/val.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/arity.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/op2.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/or.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/ref.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/co1.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/uns.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/_.c
⎿ /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/hvm4.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/names.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/b64_to_letter.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/to_str.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/is_char.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/letter_to_b64.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/is_init.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/snf/_.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_red.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_red.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_mat.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_num_sup.c
⎿ Search(pattern: "clang/**/print*.c")
⎿ Search(pattern: "clang/**/show*.c")
⎿ Bash(find /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang -type f \( -name "*print*" -o -name "*show*" \))
Waiting…
⎿ ⎿ Found 0 files
⎿ ⎿ Found 0 files
⎿ (No content)
⎿ Search(pattern: "clang/term/*.c")
⎿ Bash(ls -la /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/ | grep -E "\.c$|\.h$")
Waiting…
⎿ ⎿ Found 9 files
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/ext.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/unmark.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/val.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/arity.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/mark.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/tag.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/sub.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/clone.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new.c
⎿ -rw-r--r--@ 1 v staff 9981 Dec 18 17:52 hvm4.c
-rw-r--r--@ 1 v staff 3717 Dec 18 17:52 main.c
⎿ Search(pattern: "print|show|format|display", path: "/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang")
⎿ Read(clang/main.c)
⎿ Read(clang/hvm4.c)
⎿ Read 163 lines
⎿ Read 435 lines
⎿ ⎿ Found 15 files
clang/print/term.c
clang/collapse/flatten.c
clang/main.c
clang/sys/path_join.c
clang/sys/error.c
clang/print/name.c
clang/print/utf8.c
clang/collapse/queue.c
clang/parse/error_var.c
clang/parse/include.c
clang/parse/error.c
clang/parse/term/dup.c
clang/term/new/swi.c
clang/wnf/_.c
clang/hvm4.c
⎿ Read(clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Read(clang/print/name.c)
⎿ Read(clang/print/utf8.c)
⎿ Read 327 lines
⎿ Read 9 lines
⎿ Read 19 lines
⎿ Read(clang/term/tag.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/val.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/ext.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/sub.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Search(pattern: "clang/heap/*.c")
⎿ Bash(ls -la /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/heap/)
Waiting…
⎿ ⎿ Found 3 files
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/heap/subst_cop.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/heap/alloc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/heap/subst_var.c
⎿ total 24
drwxr-xr-x@ 5 v staff 160 Dec 18 17:52 .
drwxr-xr-x@ 19 v staff 608 Dec 18 18:01 ..
-rw-r--r--@ 1 v staff 80 Dec 18 17:52 alloc.c
-rw-r--r--@ 1 v staff 139 Dec 18 17:52 subst_cop.c
-rw-r--r--@ 1 v staff 76 Dec 18 17:52 subst_var.c
⎿ Read(clang/heap/subst_var.c)
⎿ Read(clang/heap/subst_cop.c)
⎿ Read(clang/heap/alloc.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read 5 lines
⎿ Read 6 lines
⎿ Read(clang/term/mark.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/unmark.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read(clang/snf/_.c)
⎿ Read 23 lines
⎿ Read(clang/wnf/_.c · lines 1-100)
⎿ Read 100 lines
⎿ Search(pattern: "clang/term/new/{var,lam,co0,co1,dup,alo}.c")
⎿ Bash(find /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new -name "*.c" | sort)
Waiting…
⎿ ⎿ Found 5 files
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/co1.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/co0.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/var.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/dup.c
⎿ /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/_.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/and.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/any.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/app.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/co0.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/co1.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/ddu.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/dsu.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/dup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/eql.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/mat.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/op2.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/or.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/red.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/ref.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/swi.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/uns.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/use.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/var.c
⎿ Read(clang/term/new/var.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/new/lam.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/new/co0.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/new/co1.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/new/dup.c)
⎿ Read(clang/term/new/_.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read 8 lines
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ Read 8 lines
⎿ Read 11 lines
⎿ Bash(grep -n "fn Term term_new(" /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new.c | head -5)
Waiting…
⎿ Read(clang/term/new.c)
⎿ Read 7 lines
⎿ 1:fn Term term_new(u8 sub, u8 tag, u32 ext, u32 val) {
⎿ Search(pattern: "ALO", path: "/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang")
⎿ ⎿ Found 8 files
clang/print/term.c
clang/README.md
clang/wnf/alo_lam.c
clang/wnf/alo_dry.c
clang/wnf/alo_node.c
clang/wnf/alo_dup.c
clang/wnf/_.c
clang/hvm4.c
⎿ Read(clang/wnf/alo_var.c)
⎿ Read(clang/wnf/alo_cop.c)
⎿ Read(clang/wnf/alo_nam.c)
⎿ Read(clang/wnf/alo_lam.c)
⎿ Read 11 lines
⎿ Read 16 lines
⎿ Read 7 lines
⎿ Read 14 lines
⎿ Read(clang/wnf/alo_dup.c)
⎿ Read(clang/wnf/alo_node.c)
⎿ Read(clang/wnf/alo_dry.c)
⎿ Read 19 lines
⎿ Read 13 lines
⎿ Read 13 lines
⎿ Read(clang/term/arity.c)
⎿ Read 48 lines
⎿ Read(clang/README.md · lines 1-150)
⎿ Read 91 lines
⎿ Bash(grep -n "term_new_nam" /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/nam.c)
Waiting…
⎿ Read(clang/term/new/nam.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⎿ 1:fn Term term_new_nam(u32 nam) {
⎿ Read(clang/term/new/dry.c)
⎿ Read 8 lines
⎿ Bash(grep -n "^#define NAM_" /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/hvm4.c | head -20)
Waiting…
⎿ 107:#define NAM_ADD 4356
108:#define NAM_SUB 79170
109:#define NAM_MUL 54604
110:#define NAM_DIV 16982
111:#define NAM_MOD 54212
112:#define NAM_AND 4996
113:#define NAM_OR 978
114:#define NAM_XOR 99282
115:#define NAM_LSH 50376
116:#define NAM_RSH 74952
117:#define NAM_NOT 58324
118:#define NAM_EQ 337
119:#define NAM_NE 901
120:#define NAM_LT 788
121:#define NAM_LE 773
122:#define NAM_GT 468
123:#define NAM_GE 453
124:#define NAM_DUP 17744
125:#define NAM_SUP 79184
⎿ Bash(grep -n "NAM_ZER\|NAM_SUC\|NAM_NIL\|NAM_CON\|NAM_CHR" /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/hvm4.c)
Waiting…
⎿ No matches found
⎿ Search(pattern: "NAM_ZER|NAM_SUC|NAM_NIL|NAM_CON|NAM_CHR", path: "/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang", output_mode:
"content", head_limit: 10)
⎿ ⎿ Found 10 lines
clang/print/term.c:6: if (nam == NAM_ZER) fputs("0n", f);
clang/print/term.c:7: else if (nam == NAM_SUC) fputs("1n+", f);
clang/print/term.c:8: else if (nam == NAM_NIL) fputs("[]", f);
clang/print/term.c:9: else if (nam == NAM_CON) fputs("<>", f);
clang/print/term.c:264: if (nam == NAM_ZER || nam == NAM_SUC) {
clang/print/term.c:266: while (term_tag(t) == C01 && term_ext(t) == NAM_SUC) { n++; t = HEAP[term_val(t)]; }
clang/print/term.c:268: if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) { fputc('+', f); print_term_go(
d); }
clang/print/term.c:272: if (nam == NAM_CHR && ari == 1 && term_tag(HEAP[loc]) == NUM) {
clang/print/term.c:282: if (nam == NAM_NIL || nam == NAM_CON) {
clang/print/term.c:284: int is_str = (nam == NAM_CON);
⎿ Response:
Perfect! Now I have comprehensive information. Let me create a detailed report:
HVM4 Print/Show Functions and Term Representation - Exploration Report
I've thoroughly explored the HVM4 codebase in clang/. Here's a comprehensive analysis:
1. Print Functions
Main Print Function:
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c lines 324-326
- print_term(Term term) - Entry point, calls print_term_go(stdout, term, 0)
Core Printer:
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c lines 40-259: print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth)
- Recursive term printer that dispatches on term_tag(term)
- Maintains depth for de Bruijn variable naming
Helper Functions:
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c lines 14-38: print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) - Prints
APP/DRY chains as f(x,y,z)
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c lines 261-322: print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d) - Specialized
constructor printing (naturals, chars, lists, strings)
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c lines 5-11: print_mat_name(FILE *f, u32 nam) - Prints match arm
names
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/name.c lines 1-8: print_name(FILE *f, u32 n) - Base64-encodes names
using nick alphabet
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/utf8.c lines 2-18: print_utf8(FILE *f, u32 c) - UTF-8 encoding for
Unicode chars
2. How VAR, LAM, CO0, CO1, DUP, and ALO Terms are Printed
VAR (Variables):
- Line 52-55: Prints as _ (underscore) if unresolved
- After SNF evaluation, replaced with NAM (stuck variable) by snf() function
LAM (Lambda):
- Line 85-92: Prints as λ<name>.<body>
- Name is generated from depth (de Bruijn index)
- Body is recursively printed
CO0/CO1 (Copy/Unscoped references):
- Line 79-83: Prints as _₀ or _₁ if unresolved
- These are unresolved copy references from unscoped lambda/dup bindings
- Should have been resolved by WNF evaluator
DUP (Duplication):
- Line 109-120: Prints as !<name>&<label>=<val>;<body>
- <name> is from depth for lambda binding
- <label> is from term_ext(term) (24-bit dup label)
- val and body are at heap locations from term_val(term)
ALO (Allocated Local Object):
- Line 198-200: Prints as <ALO> (placeholder)
- ALO nodes are internal, lazily convert immutable book entries to runtime terms
- Should be resolved by WNF before printing
- Contains pair: (bind_list_head, book_location) packed into 64-bit value
NAM (Stuck variables - result of unresolved VAR):
- Line 42-45: Prints the name directly
- Generated when VAR cannot be further reduced
- term_ext(term) contains the stuck variable name (24-bit)
3. Term Representation
64-bit Term Pointer Layout (from hvm4.c lines 127-143):
[SUB(1)|TAG(7)|EXT(24)|VAL(32)]
Defined in /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/hvm4.c:
- SUB_SHIFT: 63 - Substitution marker bit (lines 135)
- TAG_SHIFT: 56 - Term type (7 bits) (line 136)
- EXT_SHIFT: 32 - Label/name/ref (24 bits) (line 137)
- VAL_SHIFT: 0 - Heap address or immediate value (32 bits) (line 138)
Extraction Functions:
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/tag.c line 1-3: term_tag(Term t) - Extracts bits 56-62
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/val.c line 1-3: term_val(Term t) - Extracts bits 0-31
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/ext.c line 1-3: term_ext(Term t) - Extracts bits 32-55
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/sub.c line 1-3: term_sub(Term t) - Extracts bit 63
Term Constructor:
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new.c line 1-6: term_new(u8 sub, u8 tag, u32 ext, u32 val) - Packs all
fields into 64-bit Term
Tag Constants (hvm4.c lines 29-75):
- APP (0), VAR (1), LAM (2), CO0 (3), CO1 (4), SUP (5), DUP (6), ALO (7)
- REF (8), NAM (9), DRY (10), ERA (11), MAT (12)
- Constructor tags C00-C16 (13-29) - encode arity directly
- NUM (30), SWI (31), USE (32), OP2 (33), DSU (34), DDU (35), RED (36), EQL (37), AND (38), OR (39), UNS (40), ANY
(41), INC (42)
Specific Term Representations (from clang/README.md lines 34-47):
Book terms (immutable, from parsed definitions):
- VAR: ext=0, val=de_bruijn_index
- CO0/CO1: ext=dup_label, val=de_bruijn_index
- LAM: ext=de_bruijn_depth, val=body_location
- DUP: ext=dup_label, val=expr_location
Runtime terms (after ALO allocation):
- VAR: ext=0, val=binding_lam_body_location
- CO0/CO1: ext=dup_label, val=binding_dup_expr_location
- LAM: ext=0, val=body_location
- DUP: ext=dup_label, val=expr_location (2 slots)
4. Substitution Chasing and Resolution
Marking/Unmarking (Substitution Detection):
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/mark.c line 1-3: term_mark(Term t) - Sets SUB bit to 1
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/unmark.c line 1-3: term_unmark(Term t) - Clears SUB bit
Heap Substitution:
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/heap/subst_var.c line 1-3: heap_subst_var(u32 loc, Term val) - Stores
substitution at heap location, marking it
- /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/heap/subst_cop.c line 1-4: heap_subst_cop(u8 side, u32 loc, Term r0, Term r1)
- Substitutes CO0/CO1, selects one result
Variable Substitution Chase (wnf/_.c lines 14-22):
case VAR: {
u32 loc = term_val(next);
if (term_sub(HEAP[loc])) { // Check if location has substitution
next = term_unmark(HEAP[loc]); // Unmark and continue reducing
goto enter;
}
whnf = next;
goto apply;
}
- When VAR is encountered, check the heap location's SUB bit
- If marked, unmark and continue evaluation (follow substitution chain)
- If unmarked, term is stuck (unresolved variable)
Copy (CO0/CO1) Substitution Chase (wnf/_.c lines 24-35):
case CO0:
case CO1: {
u32 loc = term_val(next);
if (term_sub(HEAP[loc])) { // Check if binding is substituted
next = term_unmark(HEAP[loc]); // Follow substitution
goto enter;
}
Term dup_val = HEAP[loc];
STACK[S_POS++] = next;
next = dup_val;
goto enter;
}
- Similar to VAR, but if not substituted, fetches the DUP expression value
- Pushes CO0/CO1 frame on stack for later matching
5. ALO (Allocation) Nodes - Lazy Evaluation
Structure (from clang/README.md lines 48-58):
- Packs pair into single 64-bit heap word: (bind_list_head, book_term_loc)
- Low 32 bits: location in immutable book
- High 32 bits: head of linked list mapping de Bruijn levels to heap locations
ALO Processing in WNF (wnf/_.c lines 69-145):
- ALO doesn't push stack frame; immediately triggers interaction
- Extracts book term and bind list from heap
- Dispatches on book term's tag (VAR, CO0/CO1, NAM, DRY, LAM, APP, SUP, etc.)
ALO Interaction Examples:
1. wnf_alo_var (/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_var.c lines 4-10):
- Walks bind list idx steps to find binding location
- Returns VAR pointing to binding or unresolved index
2. wnf_alo_cop (/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_cop.c lines 8-15):
- Walks bind list to find binding
- Returns CO0/CO1 with binding location or unresolved index
3. wnf_alo_nam (/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_nam.c lines 4-6):
- Returns NAM directly (stuck variable, independent of context)
4. wnf_alo_lam (/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_lam.c lines 5-13):
- Allocates fresh binding location
- Creates linked list entry for new lambda
- Returns LAM with ALO node in body (recursive allocation)
5. wnf_alo_dup (/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_dup.c lines 6-18):
- Allocates fresh binding for dup variable
- Creates two ALO copies with different body locations
- Returns DUP with both ALO wrapped bodies
6. wnf_alo_node (/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_node.c lines 4-12):
- For APP, SUP, CTR, MAT - wraps each child in ALO
- Preserves bind list in all children
- Returns reconstructed node with ALO children
7. wnf_alo_dry (/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_dry.c lines 4-12):
- Wraps both fun and arg in ALO with same bind list
- Returns DRY node (stuck application)
6. Strong Normal Form (SNF) Evaluation
SNF Function (/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/snf/_.c lines 1-22):
- Calls WNF first to reach weak head normal form
- Recursively normalizes children based on arity
- Special handling for LAM: Replaces unresolved variable with NAM (stuck variable name)
- Line 11: heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1))
- This substitutes de Bruijn-indexed stuck variables into the lambda body
7. Call Chain to print_term
From /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/main.c:
- Line 140: print_term(result) after SNF evaluation
- Line 141: printf("\n")
Summary of Key File Paths
| Feature | File Path |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Main printer | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c |
| Name printer (base64) | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/name.c |
| UTF-8 printer | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/utf8.c |
| Term tag extractor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/tag.c |
| Term value extractor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/val.c |
| Term ext extractor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/ext.c |
| Term sub (marker) extractor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/sub.c |
| Term constructor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new.c |
| VAR constructor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/var.c |
| LAM constructor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/lam.c |
| CO0/CO1 constructors | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/co0.c, co1.c |
| DUP constructor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/dup.c |
| NAM constructor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/nam.c |
| DRY constructor | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/dry.c |
| Mark/unmark subs | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/mark.c, unmark.c |
| Heap substitution | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/heap/subst_var.c, subst_cop.c |
| ALO interactions | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_*.c |
| WNF main loop | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/_.c |
| SNF recursion | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/snf/_.c |
| Arity calculation | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/arity.c |
| Documentation | /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/README.md |
⎿ Done (52 tool uses · 52.1k tokens · 1m 49s)
⏺ Search(pattern: "clang/**/*.c")
⎿ Found 100 files
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/hvm4.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/names.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/b64_to_letter.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/to_str.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/is_char.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/letter_to_b64.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/nick/is_init.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_red.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_red.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_mat.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_num_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_val.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_mat_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_var.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/uns.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/_.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_dup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_node.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_num_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_any.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_node.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_use.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dup_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_cop.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_mat_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/ddu_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_val.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_mat_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/op2_num_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/use_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/alo_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_use_sup.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/mat_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/eql_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_era.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/dsu_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/and_num.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/app_red_ctr.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/wnf/or_inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/ext.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/unmark.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/val.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/arity.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/op2.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/or.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/inc.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/ref.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/nam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/co1.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/lam.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/dry.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/uns.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/term/new/_.c
∴ Thinking…
Good, I now have a good understanding of the codebase. Let me read the key files I need to modify:
1. The current printer (print/term.c)
2. The SNF evaluator (snf/_.c)
3. The collapse function (collapse/_.c)
4. The main.c file
Let me read these files now.
⏺ Now let me read the key files I'll need to modify.
⏺ Read(clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Read 327 lines
⏺ Read(clang/snf/_.c)
⎿ Read 23 lines
⏺ Read(clang/collapse/_.c)
⎿ Error: File does not exist.
⏺ Read(clang/main.c)
⎿ Read 163 lines
∴ Thinking…
Now let me also look at:
1. The collapse_flatten function
2. How book terms are represented (ALO handling)
3. The term_new functions
4. How the test runner works for non-collapsed tests
⏺ Search(pattern: "clang/collapse/**/*.c")
⎿ Found 4 files
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/collapse/queue.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/collapse/inject.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/collapse/step.c
/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/collapse/flatten.c
⏺ Read(clang/collapse/flatten.c)
⎿ Read 57 lines
⏺ Read(clang/term/new/nam.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⏺ Read(clang/term/new/lam.c)
⎿ Read 8 lines
⏺ Read(clang/term/new/_.c)
⎿ Read 11 lines
∴ Thinking…
Let me also check:
1. The test runner script to see how //! tests are handled
2. How ALO terms work (wnf/alo_*.c files)
3. The print/name.c file to understand name printing
4. The README.md for more details on term representation
⏺ Read(test/_all_.sh)
⎿ Read 130 lines
⏺ Read(clang/print/name.c)
⎿ Read 9 lines
⏺ Read(clang/README.md)
⎿ Read 91 lines
⏺ Read(clang/wnf/alo_lam.c)
⎿ Read 14 lines
⏺ Read(clang/wnf/alo_var.c)
⎿ Read 11 lines
∴ Thinking…
Now I have a good understanding of the codebase. Let me also read a few more files to understand:
1. The term_new_var and term_new_co0/co1 functions
2. The heap_subst_var function
3. The wnf/_.c to understand how substitutions are chased
4. Maybe the hvm4.c to see global definitions
⏺ Read(clang/term/new/var.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⏺ Read(clang/term/new/co0.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⏺ Read(clang/term/new/co1.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⏺ Read(clang/heap/subst_var.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⏺ Read(clang/wnf/_.c)
⎿ Read 915 lines
∴ Thinking…
Now I have a comprehensive understanding of the codebase. Let me also check for the term/mark.c and term/unmark.c files, and
check the hvm4.c for the nick_alphabet, and understand a few more details.
Let me now plan out the implementation:
Task 1: Print unscoped lambdas and floating dups with matching names
Current behavior:
- VAR prints "_"
- CO0/CO1 print "_₀" or "_₁"
- LAM generates names from depth (de Bruijn style)
- DUP generates names from depth
New behavior:
- Use a global naming scheme keyed by heap locations
- For VAR/LAM pairs: key by val() (which is the LAM's body location)
- For CO0/CO1/DUP triplets: key by val() (which is the DUP's expr location)
- Lambda-bound vars are lowercase (a, b, c, ...)
- Dup-bound vars are uppercase (A, B, C, ...)
- Floating DUPs are printed after the term using !A&L=expr; syntax
- Chase substitutions before printing
Task 2: Print ALO's correctly
- Add a 'quoted' mode to the printer
- In quoted mode, print book terms (de Bruijn indices)
- ALO should print as @{term} where term is the book term with substitutions applied
- VAR/CO0/CO1 in book terms should be printed as their values from the alo_subst list when available
Task 3: Modify snf() to have two modes
- Add quoted parameter to snf()
- When quoted=true: substitute λ-bound vars by NAMs with bruijn depth (current behavior), but return LAMs with ext field set
to bruijn depth
- When quoted=false: don't substitute, leave vars as-is
- collapse() uses quoted=true
- Direct run (no -C flag) uses quoted=false
I'll investigate additional files that might be relevant to this implementation, focusing on the specific mode variations
for different contexts.
⏺ Let me check a few more essential files before implementing.
⏺ Read(clang/term/mark.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⏺ Read(clang/term/unmark.c)
⎿ Read 4 lines
⏺ Read(clang/hvm4.c)
⎿ Read 435 lines
∴ Thinking…
Now I have a full understanding. Let me now check:
1. The second test file (snf_c2_k2.hvm4)
2. Check if we need to modify the test runner to support //! tests
Let me first see if the test file exists and what it looks like.
⏺ Let me also check for the second test file and understand the test syntax better.
⏺ Bash(cat /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4 2>/dev/null || echo "FILE DOES NOT EXIST")
⎿ FILE DOES NOT EXIST
⏺ Read(clang/term/new/dup.c)
⎿ Read 8 lines
⏺ Read(clang/wnf/alo_cop.c)
⎿ Read 16 lines
⏺ Read(clang/wnf/alo_dup.c)
⎿ Read 19 lines
∴ Thinking…
Now I have a complete understanding. Let me create a todo list and start implementing.
To summarize my understanding:
Task 1: Print unscoped lambdas and floating dups with matching names
- Need a global naming map keyed by heap location (the val() field)
- For VAR/LAM: keyed by val(LAM) = val(VAR) (the body location)
- For CO0/CO1/DUP: keyed by val(DUP) = val(CO0) = val(CO1) (the dup expr location)
- Lambda-bound vars: lowercase (a, b, c, ...)
- Dup-bound vars: uppercase (A, B, C, ...)
- After printing main term, print all discovered DUPs as !A&L=expr;
- Chase substitutions (when a VAR/CO0/CO1 points to a heap loc with SUB bit set, follow it)
Task 2: Print ALO's correctly
- Add 'quoted' mode to printer for book terms
- ALO prints as @{term} where term is the book term
- In book terms, VAR/CO0/CO1 use de Bruijn indices
- When printing, if a variable's index has a substitution in the ALO's bind list, print that substitution's value instead
Task 3: Modify snf() to have two modes
- quoted=true: current behavior but return LAMs with ext=bruijn_depth
- quoted=false: don't substitute, leave vars as-is
- collapse() uses quoted=true
- Direct run uses quoted=false
Test format:
- //output for collapsed tests
- //!output for non-collapsed tests
Now let me implement. I'll start by:
1. Creating the new test files
2. Updating the test runner to handle different test modes
3. Implementing global naming and tracking for unscoped lambdas and floating dups
4. Adjusting the normal form generation to support quoted and non-quoted modes
5. Modifying the collapse and main functions to use appropriate quoting settings
I'll tackle these systematically, ensuring each component integrates smoothly with the overall design.
⏺ Now I have a complete understanding. Let me create the implementation. I'll track my progress with a todo list.
∴ Thinking…
Now let me implement the new printer. The key changes are:
1. Global naming map: I need to track variable names keyed by heap location
- For VAR/LAM pairs: key by val() which is the body location
- For CO0/CO1/DUP: key by val() which is the expr location
2. Name generation:
- Lambda-bound: lowercase (a, b, c, ... aa, ab, ...)
- Dup-bound: uppercase (A, B, C, ... AA, AB, ...)
3. Floating dup tracking:
- When we see a CO0/CO1, we register the dup location
- After printing the term, we print all discovered DUPs
4. Substitution chasing:
- Before printing VAR/CO0/CO1, check if the target has SUB bit set
- If so, print the substituted term instead
Let me write the new print/term.c file:
⏺ Let me first write the new printer. This is the most complex part.
⏺ Write(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 358 lines, removed 63 lines
1 - fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth);
1 + // Print State (global naming and floating dup tracking)
2 + // ======================================================
3
4 - fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d);
4 + typedef struct {
5 + u32 lam_names[65536]; // loc -> unique name (lowercase: a, b, c, ...)
6 + u32 dup_names[65536]; // loc -> unique name (uppercase: A, B, C, ...)
7 + u32 dup_queue[4096]; // discovered floating dups to print
8 + u8 dup_seen[65536]; // bitmap: have we seen this dup?
9 + u32 lam_count;
10 + u32 dup_count;
11 + u32 dup_head;
12 + u32 dup_tail;
13 + } PrintState;
14
15 + static PrintState P;
16 +
17 + fn void print_state_init() {
18 + memset(&P, 0, sizeof(P));
19 + }
20 +
21 + fn u32 print_lam_name(u32 loc) {
22 + if (P.lam_names[loc & 0xFFFF] == 0) {
23 + P.lam_names[loc & 0xFFFF] = ++P.lam_count;
24 + }
25 + return P.lam_names[loc & 0xFFFF];
26 + }
27 +
28 + fn u32 print_dup_name(u32 loc) {
29 + if (P.dup_names[loc & 0xFFFF] == 0) {
30 + P.dup_names[loc & 0xFFFF] = ++P.dup_count;
31 + }
32 + return P.dup_names[loc & 0xFFFF];
33 + }
34 +
35 + fn void print_dup_discover(u32 loc) {
36 + u32 idx = loc & 0xFFFF;
37 + if (!P.dup_seen[idx]) {
38 + P.dup_seen[idx] = 1;
39 + P.dup_queue[P.dup_tail++] = loc;
40 + }
41 + }
42 +
43 + fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted);
44 +
45 + fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted);
46 +
47 fn void print_mat_name(FILE *f, u32 nam) {
48 if (nam == NAM_ZER) fputs("0n", f);
49 else if (nam == NAM_SUC) fputs("1n+", f);
...
10 else { fputc('#', f); print_name(f, nam); }
11 }
12
13 + // Print lowercase name for lambda vars (a, b, c, ... aa, ab, ...)
14 + fn void print_lam_var_name(FILE *f, u32 n) {
15 + if (n == 0) n = 1;
16 + n--;
17 + if (n < 26) {
18 + fputc('a' + n, f);
19 + } else {
20 + print_lam_var_name(f, n / 26);
21 + fputc('a' + (n % 26), f);
22 + }
23 + }
24 +
25 + // Print uppercase name for dup vars (A, B, C, ... AA, AB, ...)
26 + fn void print_dup_var_name(FILE *f, u32 n) {
27 + if (n == 0) n = 1;
28 + n--;
29 + if (n < 26) {
30 + fputc('A' + n, f);
31 + } else {
32 + print_dup_var_name(f, n / 26);
33 + fputc('A' + (n % 26), f);
34 + }
35 + }
36 +
37 // Prints APP and DRY chains as f(x,y,z)
38 - fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
38 + fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) {
39 Term spine[256];
40 u32 len = 0;
41 Term curr = term;
...
22 }
23 if (term_tag(curr) == LAM) {
24 fputc('(', f);
25 - print_term_go(f, curr, depth);
25 + print_term_go(f, curr, quoted);
26 fputc(')', f);
27 } else {
28 - print_term_go(f, curr, depth);
28 + print_term_go(f, curr, quoted);
29 }
30 fputc('(', f);
31 for (u32 i = 0; i < len; i++) {
32 if (i > 0) {
33 fputc(',', f);
34 }
35 - print_term_go(f, spine[len - 1 - i], depth);
35 + print_term_go(f, spine[len - 1 - i], quoted);
36 }
37 fputc(')', f);
38 }
39
40 - fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
40 + // Chase substitutions: if a VAR/CO0/CO1 points to a marked (substituted) slot,
41 + // return the unmarked substitution term; otherwise return the original term
42 + fn Term print_chase(Term term) {
43 + while (1) {
44 + u8 tag = term_tag(term);
45 + if (tag == VAR || tag == CO0 || tag == CO1) {
46 + u32 loc = term_val(term);
47 + if (term_sub(HEAP[loc])) {
48 + term = term_unmark(HEAP[loc]);
49 + continue;
50 + }
51 + }
52 + return term;
53 + }
54 + }
55 +
56 + fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) {
57 + // Assert: term should never have SUB bit set
58 + if (term_sub(term)) {
59 + fprintf(stderr, "PRINT_ERROR: term has SUB bit set\n");
60 + exit(1);
61 + }
62 +
63 + // Chase substitutions for variables
64 + term = print_chase(term);
65 +
66 switch (term_tag(term)) {
67 case NAM: {
68 - // Print stuck variable as just the name
68 print_name(f, term_ext(term));
69 break;
70 }
71 case DRY: {
72 - // Print stuck application as f(x,y)
73 - print_app(f, term, depth);
72 + print_app(f, term, quoted);
73 break;
74 }
75 case VAR: {
76 - // Unresolved variable (should have been substituted to NAM by snf)
77 - fputs("_", f);
76 + u32 loc = term_val(term);
77 + u32 nam = print_lam_name(loc);
78 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
79 break;
80 }
81 case NUM: {
...
78 }
79 case CO0:
80 case CO1: {
81 - // Unresolved copy reference (unscoped variable)
82 - fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "_₀" : "_₁", f);
81 + u32 loc = term_val(term);
82 + u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
83 + print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
84 + print_dup_discover(loc);
85 + fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
86 break;
87 }
88 case LAM: {
89 u32 loc = term_val(term);
90 - u32 nam = depth + 1;
90 + u32 nam = print_lam_name(loc);
91 fputs("λ", f);
92 - print_name(f, nam);
92 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
93 fputc('.', f);
94 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth + 1);
94 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted);
95 break;
96 }
97 case APP: {
98 - print_app(f, term, depth);
98 + print_app(f, term, quoted);
99 break;
100 }
101 case SUP: {
...
100 fputc('&', f);
101 print_name(f, term_ext(term));
102 fputc('{', f);
103 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
103 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
104 fputc(',', f);
105 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
105 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
106 fputc('}', f);
107 break;
108 }
109 case DUP: {
110 u32 loc = term_val(term);
111 - u32 nam = depth + 1;
111 + u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
112 fputc('!', f);
113 - print_name(f, nam);
113 + print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
114 fputc('&', f);
115 print_name(f, term_ext(term));
116 fputc('=', f);
117 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
117 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
118 fputc(';', f);
119 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth + 1);
119 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
120 break;
121 }
122 case MAT:
...
128 if (term_tag(cur) == SWI) fprintf(f, "%u", term_ext(cur));
129 else print_mat_name(f, term_ext(cur));
130 fputc(':', f);
131 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
131 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
132 Term next = HEAP[loc + 1];
133 if (term_tag(next) == MAT || term_tag(next) == SWI) fputc(';', f);
134 cur = next;
135 }
136 - // Handle tail: NUM(0) = empty, USE = wrapped default, other = default
136 if (term_tag(cur) == NUM && term_val(cur) == 0) {
137 - // empty default - just close
137 + // empty default
138 } else if (term_tag(cur) == USE) {
139 fputc(';', f);
140 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(cur)], depth);
140 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(cur)], quoted);
141 } else {
142 fputc(';', f);
143 - print_term_go(f, cur, depth);
143 + print_term_go(f, cur, quoted);
144 }
145 fputc('}', f);
146 break;
...
149 case USE: {
150 u32 loc = term_val(term);
151 fputs("λ{", f);
152 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth);
152 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted);
153 fputc('}', f);
154 break;
155 }
156 case C00 ... C16: {
157 - print_ctr(f, term, depth);
157 + print_ctr(f, term, quoted);
158 break;
159 }
160 case OP2: {
...
165 "~", "==", "!=", "<", "<=", ">", ">="
166 };
167 fputc('(', f);
168 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
168 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
169 fputc(' ', f);
170 if (opr < 17) fputs(op_syms[opr], f);
171 else fprintf(f, "?%u", opr);
172 fputc(' ', f);
173 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
173 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
174 fputc(')', f);
175 break;
176 }
177 case DSU: {
178 u32 loc = term_val(term);
179 fputs("&(", f);
180 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
180 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
181 fputs("){", f);
182 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
182 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
183 fputc(',', f);
184 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], depth);
184 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], quoted);
185 fputc('}', f);
186 break;
187 }
188 case DDU: {
189 u32 loc = term_val(term);
190 fputs("!(", f);
191 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
191 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
192 fputs(")=", f);
193 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
193 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
194 fputc(';', f);
195 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], depth);
195 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], quoted);
196 break;
197 }
198 case ALO: {
199 - fputs("<ALO>", f);
199 + if (quoted) {
200 + fputs("<ALO>", f);
201 + } else {
202 + // Print as @{book_term} with substitutions applied
203 + u32 alo_loc = term_val(term);
204 + u64 pair = HEAP[alo_loc];
205 + u32 tm_loc = (u32)(pair & 0xFFFFFFFF);
206 + u32 ls_loc = (u32)(pair >> 32);
207 + fputs("@{", f);
208 + print_alo_book(f, tm_loc, ls_loc);
209 + fputc('}', f);
210 + }
211 break;
212 }
213 case RED: {
214 u32 loc = term_val(term);
215 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
215 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
216 fputs(" ~> ", f);
217 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
217 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
218 break;
219 }
220 case EQL: {
221 u32 loc = term_val(term);
222 fputc('(', f);
223 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
223 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
224 fputs(" === ", f);
225 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
225 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
226 fputc(')', f);
227 break;
228 }
229 case AND: {
230 u32 loc = term_val(term);
231 fputc('(', f);
232 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
232 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
233 fputs(" .&. ", f);
234 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
234 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
235 fputc(')', f);
236 break;
237 }
238 case OR: {
239 u32 loc = term_val(term);
240 fputc('(', f);
241 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
241 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
242 fputs(" .|. ", f);
243 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
243 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
244 fputc(')', f);
245 break;
246 }
247 case UNS: {
248 u32 loc = term_val(term);
249 - // UNS body is λf.λv.actual_body - extract names from depths
249 Term lam_f = HEAP[loc];
250 - u32 nam_f = depth + 1;
251 - Term lam_v = HEAP[term_val(lam_f)];
252 - u32 nam_v = depth + 2;
253 - Term body = HEAP[term_val(lam_v)];
250 + u32 lam_f_loc = term_val(lam_f);
251 + u32 nam_f = print_lam_name(lam_f_loc);
252 + Term lam_v = HEAP[lam_f_loc];
253 + u32 lam_v_loc = term_val(lam_v);
254 + u32 nam_v = print_lam_name(lam_v_loc);
255 + Term body = HEAP[lam_v_loc];
256 fputs("! ", f);
257 - print_name(f, nam_f);
257 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam_f);
258 fputs(" = λ ", f);
259 - print_name(f, nam_v);
259 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam_v);
260 fputs(" ; ", f);
261 - print_term_go(f, body, depth + 2);
261 + print_term_go(f, body, quoted);
262 break;
263 }
264 case INC: {
265 u32 loc = term_val(term);
266 fputs("↑", f);
267 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth);
267 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted);
268 break;
269 }
270 }
271 }
272
273 - fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d) {
273 + // Print ALO book term with substitutions from bind list
274 + fn void print_alo_book(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc) {
275 + Term book = HEAP[tm_loc];
276 +
277 + switch (term_tag(book)) {
278 + case VAR: {
279 + u32 idx = term_val(book);
280 + // Walk bind list to find substitution
281 + u32 ls = ls_loc;
282 + for (u32 i = 0; i < idx && ls != 0; i++) {
283 + ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
284 + }
285 + if (ls != 0) {
286 + u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
287 + if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
288 + print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0);
289 + } else {
290 + // Unsubstituted - print as lambda var
291 + u32 nam = print_lam_name(bind_loc);
292 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
293 + }
294 + } else {
295 + // Out of bounds - print de Bruijn index
296 + fprintf(f, "$%u", idx);
297 + }
298 + break;
299 + }
300 + case CO0:
301 + case CO1: {
302 + u32 idx = term_val(book);
303 + u32 lab = term_ext(book);
304 + // Walk bind list to find substitution
305 + u32 ls = ls_loc;
306 + for (u32 i = 0; i < idx && ls != 0; i++) {
307 + ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
308 + }
309 + if (ls != 0) {
310 + u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
311 + if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
312 + print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0);
313 + } else {
314 + // Unsubstituted - print as dup var
315 + u32 nam = print_dup_name(bind_loc);
316 + print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
317 + print_dup_discover(bind_loc);
318 + fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
319 + }
320 + } else {
321 + // Out of bounds - print de Bruijn index
322 + fprintf(f, "$%u", idx);
323 + fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
324 + }
325 + break;
326 + }
327 + case LAM: {
328 + u32 body_loc = term_val(book);
329 + fputs("λ", f);
330 + print_lam_var_name(f, print_lam_name(tm_loc));
331 + fputc('.', f);
332 + // Create bind entry for this lambda - point to the book location itself
333 + // (since this is a quoted term, we use tm_loc as the bind location)
334 + u64 bind_ent_loc = heap_alloc(1);
335 + HEAP[bind_ent_loc] = ((u64)(u32)tm_loc << 32) | ls_loc;
336 + print_alo_book(f, body_loc, bind_ent_loc);
337 + break;
338 + }
339 + case DUP: {
340 + u32 expr_loc = term_val(book);
341 + u32 lab = term_ext(book);
342 + fputs("!", f);
343 + print_dup_var_name(f, print_dup_name(tm_loc));
344 + fputc('&', f);
345 + print_name(f, lab);
346 + fputc('=', f);
347 + print_alo_book(f, expr_loc + 0, ls_loc);
348 + fputc(';', f);
349 + // Create bind entry for this dup
350 + u64 bind_ent_loc = heap_alloc(1);
351 + HEAP[bind_ent_loc] = ((u64)(u32)tm_loc << 32) | ls_loc;
352 + print_alo_book(f, expr_loc + 1, bind_ent_loc);
353 + break;
354 + }
355 + case APP: {
356 + u32 loc = term_val(book);
357 + // Check if it's an APP chain
358 + Term fun = HEAP[loc];
359 + if (term_tag(fun) == APP || term_tag(fun) == LAM) {
360 + fputc('(', f);
361 + print_alo_book(f, loc, ls_loc);
362 + fputc(')', f);
363 + } else {
364 + print_alo_book(f, loc, ls_loc);
365 + }
366 + fputc('(', f);
367 + print_alo_book(f, loc + 1, ls_loc);
368 + fputc(')', f);
369 + break;
370 + }
371 + case SUP: {
372 + u32 loc = term_val(book);
373 + fputc('&', f);
374 + print_name(f, term_ext(book));
375 + fputc('{', f);
376 + print_alo_book(f, loc + 0, ls_loc);
377 + fputc(',', f);
378 + print_alo_book(f, loc + 1, ls_loc);
379 + fputc('}', f);
380 + break;
381 + }
382 + case NUM: {
383 + fprintf(f, "%u", term_val(book));
384 + break;
385 + }
386 + case REF: {
387 + fputc('@', f);
388 + char *name = table_get(term_ext(book));
389 + if (name != NULL) {
390 + fputs(name, f);
391 + } else {
392 + print_name(f, term_ext(book));
393 + }
394 + break;
395 + }
396 + case ERA: {
397 + fputs("&{}", f);
398 + break;
399 + }
400 + case NAM: {
401 + print_name(f, term_ext(book));
402 + break;
403 + }
404 + case C00 ... C16: {
405 + u32 nam = term_ext(book);
406 + u32 loc = term_val(book);
407 + u32 ari = term_tag(book) - C00;
408 + fputc('#', f);
409 + print_name(f, nam);
410 + fputc('{', f);
411 + for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) {
412 + if (i) fputc(',', f);
413 + print_alo_book(f, loc + i, ls_loc);
414 + }
415 + fputc('}', f);
416 + break;
417 + }
418 + default: {
419 + // For other tags, print as runtime term
420 + print_term_go(f, book, 0);
421 + break;
422 + }
423 + }
424 + }
425 +
426 + fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted) {
427 u32 nam = term_ext(t), loc = term_val(t), ari = term_tag(t) - C00;
428 // Nat: count SUCs, print as Nn or Nn+x
429 if (nam == NAM_ZER || nam == NAM_SUC) {
430 u32 n = 0;
431 while (term_tag(t) == C01 && term_ext(t) == NAM_SUC) { n++; t = HEAP[term_val(t)]; }
432 fprintf(f, "%un", n);
433 - if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) { fputc('+', f); print_term_go(f, t, d); }
433 + if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) { fputc('+', f); print_term_go(f, t, quoted); }
434 return;
435 }
436 // Char: 'x' or 'λ'
...
304 fputc('[', f);
305 for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02; x = HEAP[term_val(x)+1]) {
306 if (x != t) fputc(',', f);
307 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(x)], d);
307 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(x)], quoted);
308 }
309 fputc(']', f);
310 return;
311 }
312 // Improper list: h<>t
313 if (nam == NAM_CON) {
314 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], d); fputs("<>", f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+1], d);
314 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted); fputs("<>", f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+1], quoted);
315 return;
316 }
317 }
318 // Default CTR
319 fputc('#', f); print_name(f, nam); fputc('{', f);
320 - for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) { if (i) fputc(',', f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+i], d); }
320 + for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) { if (i) fputc(',', f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+i], quoted); }
321 fputc('}', f);
322 }
323
324 + // Print floating dups discovered during printing
325 + fn void print_floating_dups(FILE *f, u8 quoted) {
326 + while (P.dup_head < P.dup_tail) {
327 + u32 loc = P.dup_queue[P.dup_head++];
328 + // Only print if this is a DUP node (not yet printed inline)
329 + Term val = HEAP[loc];
330 + if (term_sub(val)) {
331 + // Already substituted, skip
332 + continue;
333 + }
334 + // Print the dup binding
335 + u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
336 + fputc('!', f);
337 + print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
338 + fputc('&', f);
339 + // We need to find the label - CO0/CO1 carry it, but we only have the loc
340 + // The val at loc is the dup'd expression. We need to reconstruct.
341 + // Actually for floating dups, we just print the expression at that location
342 + // The label was stored in the CO0/CO1 that discovered this dup
343 + // For now, we can't recover the exact label, so we use a placeholder
344 + // This needs more info passed through - let me fix this
345 + fputs("?", f);
346 + fputc('=', f);
347 + print_term_go(f, val, quoted);
348 + fputc(';', f);
349 + }
350 + }
351 +
352 + fn void print_term_full(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) {
353 + print_state_init();
354 + print_term_go(f, term, quoted);
355 + print_floating_dups(f, quoted);
356 + }
357 +
358 fn void print_term(Term term) {
359 - print_term_go(stdout, term, 0);
359 + print_term_full(stdout, term, 0);
360 }
361 +
362 + fn void print_term_quoted(Term term) {
363 + print_term_full(stdout, term, 1);
364 + }
∴ Thinking…
I realize I need to store the label when we discover a floating dup via CO0/CO1. Let me fix the print state to also track
labels.
Also, I realized there's an issue: I need to modify the function to track the labels alongside dup locations. Let me update
the code.
⏺ I need to fix the floating dup tracking to also store the label. Let me update the code.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 3 lines, removed 1 line
4 typedef struct {
5 u32 lam_names[65536]; // loc -> unique name (lowercase: a, b, c, ...)
6 u32 dup_names[65536]; // loc -> unique name (uppercase: A, B, C, ...)
7 + u32 dup_labs[65536]; // loc -> dup label
8 u32 dup_queue[4096]; // discovered floating dups to print
9 u8 dup_seen[65536]; // bitmap: have we seen this dup?
10 u32 lam_count;
...
32 return P.dup_names[loc & 0xFFFF];
33 }
34
35 - fn void print_dup_discover(u32 loc) {
35 + fn void print_dup_discover(u32 loc, u32 lab) {
36 u32 idx = loc & 0xFFFF;
37 if (!P.dup_seen[idx]) {
38 P.dup_seen[idx] = 1;
39 + P.dup_labs[idx] = lab;
40 P.dup_queue[P.dup_tail++] = loc;
41 }
42 }
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to update the CO0/CO1 case to pass the label when discovering dups.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 2 lines, removed 1 line
171 case CO0:
172 case CO1: {
173 u32 loc = term_val(term);
174 + u32 lab = term_ext(term);
175 u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
176 print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
177 - print_dup_discover(loc);
177 + print_dup_discover(loc, lab);
178 fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
179 break;
180 }
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to update the floating dups printing to use the stored label, and also update the print_alo_book function to pass
the label when discovering dups.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 2 lines, removed 8 lines
585 fn void print_floating_dups(FILE *f, u8 quoted) {
586 while (P.dup_head < P.dup_tail) {
587 u32 loc = P.dup_queue[P.dup_head++];
588 - // Only print if this is a DUP node (not yet printed inline)
588 Term val = HEAP[loc];
589 if (term_sub(val)) {
590 // Already substituted, skip
...
593 }
594 // Print the dup binding
595 u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
596 + u32 lab = P.dup_labs[loc & 0xFFFF];
597 fputc('!', f);
598 print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
599 fputc('&', f);
600 - // We need to find the label - CO0/CO1 carry it, but we only have the loc
601 - // The val at loc is the dup'd expression. We need to reconstruct.
602 - // Actually for floating dups, we just print the expression at that location
603 - // The label was stored in the CO0/CO1 that discovered this dup
604 - // For now, we can't recover the exact label, so we use a placeholder
605 - // This needs more info passed through - let me fix this
606 - fputs("?", f);
600 + print_name(f, lab);
601 fputc('=', f);
602 print_term_go(f, val, quoted);
603 fputc(';', f);
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to update the print_alo_book function to pass labels when discovering dups via CO0/CO1. Let me find and fix that.
⏺ Now let me update the print_alo_book function to pass the label when discovering dups.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 1 line, removed 1 line
409 // Unsubstituted - print as dup var
410 u32 nam = print_dup_name(bind_loc);
411 print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
412 - print_dup_discover(bind_loc);
412 + print_dup_discover(bind_loc, lab);
413 fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
414 }
415 } else {
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to update the TodoWrite and then move on to modifying the snf() function. Let me update the todos first.
∴ Thinking…
Now let me modify the snf() function to add the 'quoted' parameter. When quoted is true, we substitute with NAMs (current
behavior) and return lambdas with ext=bruijn_depth. When quoted is false, we don't substitute.
⏺ Now let me modify the snf() function to add the 'quoted' parameter.
⏺ Write(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/snf/_.c)
⎿ Added 22 lines, removed 7 lines
1 - fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth) {
1 + fn Term snf_go(Term term, u32 depth, u8 quoted) {
2 term = wnf(term);
3 u32 ari = term_arity(term);
4 if (ari == 0) {
...
7 u64 loc = term_val(term);
8 if (term_tag(term) == LAM) {
9 Term body = HEAP[loc];
10 - // ^(depth+1) for stuck variable
11 - heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1));
12 - HEAP[loc] = snf(body, depth + 1);
10 + if (quoted) {
11 + // Quoted mode: substitute bound var with NAM(depth+1)
12 + // and return lambda with ext=depth+1 (book-style)
13 + heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1));
14 + HEAP[loc] = snf_go(body, depth + 1, quoted);
15 + return term_new(0, LAM, depth + 1, loc);
16 + } else {
17 + // Unquoted mode: don't substitute, just normalize body
18 + HEAP[loc] = snf_go(body, depth + 1, quoted);
19 + }
20 } else if (term_tag(term) == DRY) {
21 - HEAP[loc + 0] = snf(HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
22 - HEAP[loc + 1] = snf(HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
21 + HEAP[loc + 0] = snf_go(HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted);
22 + HEAP[loc + 1] = snf_go(HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted);
23 } else {
24 for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) {
25 - HEAP[loc + i] = snf(HEAP[loc + i], depth);
25 + HEAP[loc + i] = snf_go(HEAP[loc + i], depth, quoted);
26 }
27 }
28 return term;
29 }
30 +
31 + fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth) {
32 + return snf_go(term, depth, 0);
33 + }
34 +
35 + fn Term snf_quoted(Term term, u32 depth) {
36 + return snf_go(term, depth, 1);
37 + }
∴ Thinking…
Good. Now let me update the collapse/flatten.c to use snf_quoted.
∴ Thinking…
Now let me update collapse/flatten.c to use snf_quoted and print_term_quoted.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/collapse/flatten.c)
⎿ Added 3 lines, removed 3 lines
41 collapse_queue_push(&pq, (CollapseQueueItem){.pri = (u8)(pri + 1), .loc = sup_loc + 0});
42 collapse_queue_push(&pq, (CollapseQueueItem){.pri = (u8)(pri + 1), .loc = sup_loc + 1});
43 } else if (term_tag(t) != ERA) {
44 - // Non-SUP, non-ERA result - normalize and print
45 - t = snf(t, 0);
46 - print_term(t);
44 + // Non-SUP, non-ERA result - normalize and print (quoted mode)
45 + t = snf_quoted(t, 0);
46 + print_term_quoted(t);
47 if (show_itrs) {
48 printf(" \033[2m#%llu\033[0m", ITRS);
49 }
∴ Thinking…
Now let me update main.c. The main.c already uses snf() with the default (unquoted) mode, and print_term() which now uses
the new printer in unquoted mode. So I don't think I need to change much there, but let me verify.
Actually, I realize print_term() now calls print_term_full with quoted=0, and snf() returns unquoted. So this should be
correct.
Now let me create the test files and modify the test runner. Let me update the todos.
∴ Thinking…
Now let me create the test file snf_c2_k2.hvm4. Note the expected output from the user:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
So I need to create this test file.
⏺ Write(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4)
⎿ Wrote 5 lines to /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4
@c2 = λs. !S0&C=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
@k2 = λs. !S0&K=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
@main = @c2(@k2)
//!λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to update the existing test file snf_unscoped.hvm4 to have the correct expected output. The expected output was:
λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
But wait, looking at the file again, it already has the expected output with //!. Let me read it to double-check.
⏺ Let me verify the snf_unscoped test file has the correct format.
⏺ Read(test/snf_unscoped.hvm4)
⎿ Read 6 lines
∴ Thinking…
I notice there's an issue with the expected output - there's a d that seems to be an unscoped variable. Looking at the test
file:```
#Tup{x, F, K₀, K₁, λv.v}
- `x` is the unscoped variable (from `λx;`)
- `F` is the lambda `λx;`- `K₀, K₁` are the dup vars from `! K &L = k;`
- `λv.v` is a regular lambda
The expected output `λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;` shows:
- `λa` - the outer lambda `λk`
- `λb` - the lambda `F` from `! F = λx;`- `d` - the unscoped variable `x`
- `λc.λd.c` - wait, this doesn't match...
Let me re-read the expected output from the user's task description:
λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
Hmm, looking at this:
- `λa` = the outer lambda `λk`
- `λb` = this should be `F`'s body lambda... but wait, `F = λx;` creates an unscoped pair
Actually, I think I'm misunderstanding. Let me re-read the user's explanation more carefully.
Looking at the spec again:
! F = λx; // creates an unbound lam/var pair: F = λa.$x.a and x = $x
So `λx;` is a syntax that creates:
- `F` = `λa.$x.a` (a lambda with an unscoped variable reference in its body)
- `x` = `$x` (the unscoped variable)
So the term would expand to something like:
λk.
#Tup{$x, λa.$x.a, K₀, K₁, λv.v}
with `! K &L = k` creating the dup.
I see the unscoped variable `$x` creates a unique pattern where the lambda introduces an external reference that isn't
directly bound within its immediate scope. This suggests a complex interaction between variable binding and lambda
abstraction.
The lambda structure implies a nested transformation where `F` represents a specific lambda function that manipulates the
unscoped variable. The tuple construction seems to capture this transformation, embedding the variable and its potential
modifications within a structured representation.
The key observation is how the unscoped variable `$x` interacts with the lambda abstraction, creating a mechanism for
variable manipulation that goes beyond traditional lambda calculus variable binding. I'll carefully complete the partial
thought about parsing the lambda expression, using the next thinking to finish the sentence:
{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}` reveals a complex nested structure with multiple components. The tuple contains an unscoped variable
`d`, followed by a nested lambda `λc.λd.c` that demonstrates an interesting scoping pattern. I notice the presence of
additional elements like `A₀`, `A₁`, and a final lambda `λe.e`.
The unscoped binding syntax is intriguing, particularly how it introduces variables like `λx` through the `! F = λx;`
mechanism. This suggests a non-standard lambda calculus representation where variable bindings have a unique scoping rule.
The discrepancy between the expected output and the input code raises questions about how lambda expressions are transformed
or parsed in this specific system. The single visible lambda `λk` contrasts with the more complex nested lambda structure
in the expected output.
I'm noticing a potential mismatch between the parsing, evaluation, and final representation of lambda expressions,
especially around how unscoped bindings are handled during different stages of computation.
The key observation is how the UNS node transforms through evaluation, creating a tuple with specific lambda components. The
unscoped variable and lambda seem to undergo complex renaming and binding processes, with global naming introducing
additional complexity.
The transformation involves multiple steps: creating an unscoped pair, resolving lambda bindings, and generating a final
tuple representation that captures the original lambda's structure while managing variable scoping dynamically.
The critical insight emerges around how `! F = λx;` generates a lambda that references an unscoped variable, fundamentally
altering the reduction strategy and variable binding mechanism.
I notice the tuple structure matches exactly: five elements with consistent positions. The lambda transformations suggest a
complex interaction between bound and unbound variables, potentially revealing a subtle compilation or reduction mechanism
in the system.
The systematic comparison between source and expected output hints at a precise transformation rule that preserves
structural integrity while modifying variable references.
The comment about UNS semantics introduces an intriguing twist - a construct that seemingly generates an unbound
lambda/variable pair with a specific binding behavior. The notation `$x` seems critical, suggesting a special variable
scoping mechanism I need to investigate further.
The lambda structure `λa.$x.a` implies a complex variable reference where `$x` represents an unscoped element interacting
with the bound variable `a`. This hints at a nuanced lambda calculus extension beyond traditional scoping rules.
The dual lambda form `λc.λd.c` reinforces the complexity, showing a nested lambda structure where the first lambda captures
an argument, and the inner lambda returns the first argument. This suggests a deliberate transformation or encoding
happening during the UNS process.
The key observations involve unbound variable interactions, lambda transformations, and the intricate relationship between
scoped and unscoped references in this specific lambda calculus variant.
I'm tracking how `F` represents a complex lambda function that captures an unscoped variable, with nested lambda
abstractions creating interesting binding dynamics. The notation suggests a sophisticated mechanism for variable reference
and duplication.
The structure implies multiple lambda layers, with specific binding and cloning operations that modify how variables
interact across different scoping contexts. The `#Tup` and `!` constructs seem central to this variable manipulation
strategy.
I'll investigate the actual runtime behavior by compiling and executing the implementation, which will provide concrete
insights into how these lambda abstractions resolve during evaluation.
⏺ Now let me modify the test runner to handle //! tests that run without collapse mode.
∴ Thinking…
Let me modify the test runner to handle //! tests (non-collapsed mode).
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/test/_all_.sh)
⎿ Added 10 lines, removed 2 lines
55 name="$(basename "${test_file%.hvm4}")"
56
57 # Extract trailing // comment lines (consecutive from end of file)
58 + # Lines starting with //! indicate non-collapsed mode tests
59 expected=""
60 nlines=0
61 + no_collapse=0
62 while IFS= read -r line; do
63 if [[ "$line" == //* ]]; then
64 - [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${line#//}"$'\n'"$expected"
65 - [ -z "$expected" ] && expected="${line#//}"
64 + content="${line#//}"
65 + # Check for //! prefix (non-collapsed mode)
66 + if [[ "$content" == !* ]]; then
67 + no_collapse=1
68 + content="${content#!}"
69 + fi
70 + [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"$'\n'"$expected"
71 + [ -z "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"
72 ((nlines++))
73 else
74 break
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to update the test runner to use no flags when no_collapse=1.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/test/_all_.sh)
⎿ Added 11 lines, removed 7 lines
94 keep=$((total - nlines))
95 head -n "$keep" "$test_file" > "$tmp"
96
97 - # Determine flags: all tests use -C by default
98 - flags="-C"
99 - case "$name" in
100 - collapse_* | enum_* )
101 - [ -n "$collapse_count" ] && flags="${flags}${collapse_count}"
102 - ;;
103 - esac
97 + # Determine flags: use -C by default unless //! was specified
98 + if [ "$no_collapse" -eq 1 ]; then
99 + flags=""
100 + else
101 + flags="-C"
102 + case "$name" in
103 + collapse_* | enum_* )
104 + [ -n "$collapse_count" ] && flags="${flags}${collapse_count}"
105 + ;;
106 + esac
107 + fi
108
109 actual="$("$bin" "$tmp" $flags 2>&1)"
110
∴ Thinking…
Now let me compile and run the new tests to see if everything works. First, let me try compiling.
∴ Thinking…
Let me first try to compile the code to see if there are any errors.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang && clang -O2 -o main main.c 2>&1)
⎿ Error: Exit code 1
In file included from main.c:12:
In file included from ./hvm4.c:296:
./print/term.c:303:9: error: call to undeclared function 'print_alo_book'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit
function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
303 | print_alo_book(f, tm_loc, ls_loc);
| ^
./print/term.c:369:9: error: static declaration of 'print_alo_book' follows non-static declaration
369 | fn void print_alo_book(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc) {
| ^
./print/term.c:303:9: note: previous implicit declaration is here
303 | print_alo_book(f, tm_loc, ls_loc);
| ^
2 errors generated.
∴ Thinking…
I need to add a forward declaration for print_alo_book before it's used. Let me fix this.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 1 line, removed 1 line
43 }
44
45 fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted);
46 -
46 + fn void print_alo_book(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc);
47 fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted);
48
49 fn void print_mat_name(FILE *f, u32 nam) {
∴ Thinking…
Let me try compiling again.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang && clang -O2 -o main main.c 2>&1)
⎿ (No content)
∴ Thinking…
Compilation succeeded. Now let me run the two new tests to see what the output is.
⏺ Now let me run the two new tests.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude && ./clang/main test/snf_unscoped.hvm4 2>&1)
⎿ λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
∴ Thinking…
The output is:
λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
The expected output was:
λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
There are differences:
1. Expected has λa.λb.#Tup{...} but actual has λa.#Tup{...} - missing a lambda
2. The variable naming inside the tuple differs
The actual output shows λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,...} where:
- a is the outer lambda binding
- b is the unscoped variable (inside the tuple)
- λc.λb.c is F (a lambda with an unscoped ref in its body)
- A₀, A₁ are the dup vars
- λd.d is the identity lambda
But the expected output has λa.λb. at the start. Let me check if the expected output in the test file was correct. Let me
re-read the user's exact specification.
Looking at the user's specification again:
Instead, the correct output should've been:
λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
So there's a λa.λb. at the start. But from my understanding, the source only has one lambda at the top level (λk.). Where
does the second lambda come from?
Let me check what the UNS construct does. Looking at the source:
@main = λk.
! F = λx; // creates an unbound lam/var pair
I notice the lambda binding seems to be creating an additional wrapper. The λb. in the expected output suggests an extra
lambda layer that wasn't in the original implementation. This might be related to how the UNS construct handles variable
scoping and lambda abstraction.
The variable renaming from b to d and c to d in the expected output also indicates some transformation happening during the
lambda generation process. This could be part of a normalization or variable substitution step in the compilation or
transformation of the lambda calculus expression.
I'll investigate the wnf/uns.c file to understand the underlying mechanism of this lambda wrapping.
⏺ Let me check how UNS works to understand the expected behavior.
⏺ Read(clang/wnf/uns.c)
⎿ Read 16 lines
⏺ Bash(./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4 2>&1)
⎿ λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
∴ Thinking…
The snf_c2_k2 test output is:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
```Expected:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
Differences:
1. Actual ends with `};` while expected ends with `}`
2. Inside the ALO, actual has `&C{b,&K{C₀,c}}` but expected has `&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}}`
The trailing `;` is from the floating dup printing - after the last floating dup we should not print `;`. Let me fix that.
As for the ALO content, it looks like the substitution printing is showing `b` and `c` instead of `A₀` and `A₁`. This might
be because the bind locations point to something unexpected. Let me investigate.
Actually wait, looking at the expected output more carefully:
- `@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}`
vs actual:
- `@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})}`
The lambda `λc` should bind to A₁, but in the actual output there's a `c` appearing. This suggests the variable naming in
the ALO book term printer is using lambda names instead of dup names for the CO0/CO1.
I see now that de Bruijn indices play a crucial role here. The lambda `λc` introduces a new binding context that shadows
outer bindings. This means the printer needs to carefully track how variables are referenced across different scoping
levels. The expected output indicates that even within nested contexts, we should maintain references to the original dup
bindings like A₀ and A₁, rather than introducing new local variables like b and c.
The SUP structure `&C{λc.A₁,B₁}` contains a lambda and B₁, with the lambda `λc` having a specific CO1 relationship. This
suggests a nuanced approach to variable naming and reference tracking is required in the book term printer. I see the code
is walking through the bind list to locate a substitution for a term. If a valid binding is found, it checks whether the
term is substituted. When unsubstituted, it prints a dup variable name, discovers the binding, and adds a subscript
indicating whether it's CO0 or CO1. The loop iterates through the bind list using the location pointer, advancing until
either the index is reached or the list ends.
The core complexity emerges from how lambda and dup bindings interact in the same list. A lambda binding can shadow previous
entries, which creates ambiguity when resolving variable references. The current implementation might not consistently
handle shadowing across different term types, potentially causing inconsistent variable name resolution.
The semantic challenge involves tracking how bindings from different contexts (lambda vs. dup) interact and ensuring
predictable variable name generation across these mixed binding scenarios.
I need to carefully examine how bind entries are constructed and how index-based resolution works when multiple binding
types coexist in the same scope list.
The current implementation uses the lambda's book location as the bind entry's reference point. However, this approach fails
to distinguish between different binding mechanisms like VAR, CO0, and CO1 when resolving index-based references.
The core problem lies in creating a uniform bind entry mechanism that correctly tracks different binding contexts,
especially for nested lambda structures where index resolution becomes complex.
I need to carefully distinguish between runtime allocations and quoted lambda bindings. The bind list should reflect actual
runtime allocations, not introduce unnecessary entries for quoted lambda terms. When printing book terms, lambda variables
should be represented as fresh names, preserving their quoted status without premature allocation.
The key challenge is developing a precise indexing strategy that can differentiate between local and external variable
references while maintaining the semantic integrity of the lambda term's structure. I'll track the book depth when recursing
through book terms, mapping de Bruijn indices to runtime bindings. When encountering variables, I'll check if the index is
less than the current book depth. If so, I'll generate a fresh variable name. Otherwise, I'll look up the corresponding
binding in the runtime list by adjusting the index relative to the current book depth.
The strategy involves carefully managing variable references during term printing, ensuring correct translation between de
Bruijn indices and actual runtime bindings. This requires maintaining a precise depth tracking mechanism while traversing
nested lambda abstractions.
The core challenge involves correctly distinguishing between lambda-bound variables and duplicated variables, ensuring each
reference is printed with the appropriate runtime binding.
When recursively processing nested book terms, the current implementation incorrectly maps bind entries to book locations
instead of runtime locations. This misalignment causes CO0 and CO1 to be printed as lambda variables instead of their
intended dup var representations.
For a pure book term printer, the existing bind list from the ALO transformation might already contain the correct mapping,
suggesting the solution involves carefully tracking variable bindings during the recursive traversal.
The key strategy involves maintaining a book depth counter and handling variable references based on their relative depth.
When encountering a VAR/CO0/CO1, the printer should:
1. Compare the variable's index against the current book depth
2. Print quoted variables for indices within the book's scope
3. Use the book's external label for quoted variable representation
4. Avoid modifying the original bind list during traversal
This approach preserves the original bind list's integrity while correctly rendering nested book term variables. I see the
problem now. When processing lambda terms, the bind entry points to the lambda location, but we're incorrectly using
print_dup_name() for constructors that reference this lambda. This means we're generating incorrect names for constructor
variables bound by lambdas. The current approach doesn't distinguish between lambda and constructor bindings, leading to
naming inconsistencies.
The interaction calculus fundamentally separates variable and constructor binding mechanisms. A variable binds to a lambda,
while a constructor binds to a duplication. These are semantically distinct binding types, and our current implementation
fails to respect this crucial difference.
The code traverses a lexical scope list to locate the appropriate binding, using an index to navigate through potential
bindings. When a binding is found, it either creates a new variable term or prepares a constructor term based on the
specific binding context.
The key insight reveals a nuanced relationship between variable references and constructor references in the de Bruijn
indexing system. Different term types (VAR, CO0, CO1) can point to the same binding location, but with distinct semantic
interpretations depending on the surrounding context.
In a well-structured program, the index serves as a consistent mechanism to reference nested binders, with the specific
meaning determined by the term type's intended use.
The complexity arises from how different term constructors interact with the shared binding mechanism, potentially creating
subtle interactions that require careful tracing to fully understand.
I need to carefully examine how the indices map between the runtime bindings and the lambda term's structure, particularly
focusing on how VAR and LAM indices relate to the bind list. The current output suggests a misalignment I haven't yet fully
grasped.
The key observation is that the de Bruijn indexing creates a layered mapping where the most recent binder sits at index 0,
which fundamentally changes how I'm tracking variable references across different term constructions.
When processing a lambda term, the binding mechanism shifts indices dynamically. An index of 1 points to the binder
immediately preceding the current lambda, which means the bind list must be carefully synchronized with the term's depth and
structure.
The critical insight is distinguishing between indices within the book term versus those referencing external runtime
bindings, creating a nuanced tracking mechanism that requires precise depth management during term processing.
The potential complexity emerges when bind entries are inserted, potentially displacing existing entries and creating subtle
indexing challenges that could lead to incorrect variable resolution or printing.
I realize the core problem involves tracking original indices versus modified list positions. Instead of directly
manipulating the bind list, I'll implement a depth-tracking mechanism that preserves the original indexing semantics while
allowing proper variable lookup.
My approach will involve maintaining a separate book depth parameter. This allows me to distinguish between quoted variables
within the book term and variables from the original bind list, ensuring accurate variable representation without
destructive list modifications.
The strategy involves:
- Preserving original bind list structure
- Using book_depth to offset index lookups
- Generating fresh names for quoted variables
- Maintaining existing resolution logic for non-quoted variables
⏺ I see the issue. For the ALO book term printing, I'm incorrectly modifying the bind list. Let me fix the printer to properly
track book depth.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 1 line, removed 1 line
43 }
44
45 fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted);
46 - fn void print_alo_book(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc);
46 + fn void print_alo_book_go(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc, u32 depth);
47 fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted);
48
49 fn void print_mat_name(FILE *f, u32 nam) {
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to update the print_alo_book function to track depth properly.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 1 line, removed 1 line
300 u32 tm_loc = (u32)(pair & 0xFFFFFFFF);
301 u32 ls_loc = (u32)(pair >> 32);
302 fputs("@{", f);
303 - print_alo_book(f, tm_loc, ls_loc);
303 + print_alo_book_go(f, tm_loc, ls_loc, 0);
304 fputc('}', f);
305 }
306 break;
∴ Thinking…
Now let me rewrite the entire print_alo_book function to use depth properly.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 54 lines, removed 53 lines
366 }
367
368 // Print ALO book term with substitutions from bind list
369 - fn void print_alo_book(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc) {
369 + // depth tracks how many binders (LAM/DUP) we've entered in the book term
370 + fn void print_alo_book_go(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc, u32 depth) {
371 Term book = HEAP[tm_loc];
372
373 switch (term_tag(book)) {
374 case VAR: {
375 u32 idx = term_val(book);
376 - // Walk bind list to find substitution
377 - u32 ls = ls_loc;
378 - for (u32 i = 0; i < idx && ls != 0; i++) {
379 - ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
380 - }
381 - if (ls != 0) {
382 - u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
383 - if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
384 - print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0);
376 + if (idx < depth) {
377 + // Refers to a binder inside the book term (quoted)
378 + print_lam_var_name(f, idx + 1);
379 + } else {
380 + // Refers to the bind list
381 + u32 adj_idx = idx - depth;
382 + u32 ls = ls_loc;
383 + for (u32 i = 0; i < adj_idx && ls != 0; i++) {
384 + ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
385 + }
386 + if (ls != 0) {
387 + u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
388 + if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
389 + print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0);
390 + } else {
391 + u32 nam = print_lam_name(bind_loc);
392 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
393 + }
394 } else {
395 - // Unsubstituted - print as lambda var
396 - u32 nam = print_lam_name(bind_loc);
397 - print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
395 + fprintf(f, "$%u", idx);
396 }
397 - } else {
398 - // Out of bounds - print de Bruijn index
399 - fprintf(f, "$%u", idx);
397 }
398 break;
399 }
...
396 case CO1: {
397 u32 idx = term_val(book);
398 u32 lab = term_ext(book);
399 - // Walk bind list to find substitution
400 - u32 ls = ls_loc;
401 - for (u32 i = 0; i < idx && ls != 0; i++) {
402 - ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
403 - }
404 - if (ls != 0) {
405 - u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
406 - if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
407 - print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0);
399 + if (idx < depth) {
400 + // Refers to a binder inside the book term (quoted)
401 + print_dup_var_name(f, idx + 1);
402 + fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
403 + } else {
404 + // Refers to the bind list
405 + u32 adj_idx = idx - depth;
406 + u32 ls = ls_loc;
407 + for (u32 i = 0; i < adj_idx && ls != 0; i++) {
408 + ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
409 + }
410 + if (ls != 0) {
411 + u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
412 + if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
413 + print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0);
414 + } else {
415 + u32 nam = print_dup_name(bind_loc);
416 + print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
417 + print_dup_discover(bind_loc, lab);
418 + fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
419 + }
420 } else {
421 - // Unsubstituted - print as dup var
422 - u32 nam = print_dup_name(bind_loc);
423 - print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
424 - print_dup_discover(bind_loc, lab);
421 + fprintf(f, "$%u", idx);
422 fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
423 }
424 - } else {
425 - // Out of bounds - print de Bruijn index
426 - fprintf(f, "$%u", idx);
427 - fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
424 }
425 break;
426 }
427 case LAM: {
428 u32 body_loc = term_val(book);
429 fputs("λ", f);
430 - print_lam_var_name(f, print_lam_name(tm_loc));
430 + print_lam_var_name(f, depth + 1);
431 fputc('.', f);
432 - // Create bind entry for this lambda - point to the book location itself
433 - // (since this is a quoted term, we use tm_loc as the bind location)
434 - u64 bind_ent_loc = heap_alloc(1);
435 - HEAP[bind_ent_loc] = ((u64)(u32)tm_loc << 32) | ls_loc;
436 - print_alo_book(f, body_loc, bind_ent_loc);
432 + print_alo_book_go(f, body_loc, ls_loc, depth + 1);
433 break;
434 }
435 case DUP: {
436 u32 expr_loc = term_val(book);
437 u32 lab = term_ext(book);
438 fputs("!", f);
439 - print_dup_var_name(f, print_dup_name(tm_loc));
439 + print_dup_var_name(f, depth + 1);
440 fputc('&', f);
441 print_name(f, lab);
442 fputc('=', f);
443 - print_alo_book(f, expr_loc + 0, ls_loc);
443 + print_alo_book_go(f, expr_loc + 0, ls_loc, depth);
444 fputc(';', f);
445 - // Create bind entry for this dup
446 - u64 bind_ent_loc = heap_alloc(1);
447 - HEAP[bind_ent_loc] = ((u64)(u32)tm_loc << 32) | ls_loc;
448 - print_alo_book(f, expr_loc + 1, bind_ent_loc);
445 + print_alo_book_go(f, expr_loc + 1, ls_loc, depth + 1);
446 break;
447 }
448 case APP: {
449 u32 loc = term_val(book);
450 - // Check if it's an APP chain
450 Term fun = HEAP[loc];
451 if (term_tag(fun) == APP || term_tag(fun) == LAM) {
452 fputc('(', f);
453 - print_alo_book(f, loc, ls_loc);
453 + print_alo_book_go(f, loc, ls_loc, depth);
454 fputc(')', f);
455 } else {
456 - print_alo_book(f, loc, ls_loc);
456 + print_alo_book_go(f, loc, ls_loc, depth);
457 }
458 fputc('(', f);
459 - print_alo_book(f, loc + 1, ls_loc);
459 + print_alo_book_go(f, loc + 1, ls_loc, depth);
460 fputc(')', f);
461 break;
462 }
...
468 fputc('&', f);
469 print_name(f, term_ext(book));
470 fputc('{', f);
471 - print_alo_book(f, loc + 0, ls_loc);
471 + print_alo_book_go(f, loc + 0, ls_loc, depth);
472 fputc(',', f);
473 - print_alo_book(f, loc + 1, ls_loc);
473 + print_alo_book_go(f, loc + 1, ls_loc, depth);
474 fputc('}', f);
475 break;
476 }
...
505 fputc('{', f);
506 for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) {
507 if (i) fputc(',', f);
508 - print_alo_book(f, loc + i, ls_loc);
508 + print_alo_book_go(f, loc + i, ls_loc, depth);
509 }
510 fputc('}', f);
511 break;
512 }
513 default: {
514 - // For other tags, print as runtime term
514 print_term_go(f, book, 0);
515 break;
516 }
∴ Thinking…
Now I also need to fix the trailing semicolon issue. After printing all floating dups, we shouldn't have a trailing
semicolon. Let me fix that too.
⏺ Now let me compile and test again.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang && clang -O2 -o main main.c 2>&1)
⎿ (No content)
∴ Thinking…
The compilation succeeded. Now let me run the tests again.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude && ./clang/main test/snf_unscoped.hvm4 2>&1)
⎿ λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude && ./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4 2>&1)
⎿ λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
∴ Thinking…
Hmm, the snf_c2_k2 output still has issues. Let me analyze:
Expected: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
Actual: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
The main body looks the same, but inside the ALO:
- Expected: &C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}}
- Actual: &C{b,&K{C₀,c}}
So the CO0/CO1 are being printed as b and c (lambda vars) instead of A₀ and A₁ (dup vars).
Let me trace through:
1. The ALO book term has a structure like &C{CO0_N,&K{CO0_M,CO1_P}}
2. The CO0 with index N is being printed as a lambda var b
3. This suggests idx < depth is true for these CO0/CO1
But that doesn't make sense. If the CO0/CO1 refer to bindings OUTSIDE the ALO book term (in the bind list), then idx should
be >= the depth we're at.
Wait, let me re-check the expected output:
@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
Inside the ALO, we have:
- λc.A₁ - a LAM with CO1 A₁ in its body
- B₁ - a CO1
- A₀ - a CO0
- C₀ - a CO0
- A₁ - a CO1
These A, B, C refer to dup bindings OUTSIDE the ALO. In the book term, they would be CO0/CO1 with de Bruijn indices.
But my code is printing b and c which are lambda names. I need to investigate the index calculation mechanism carefully to
understand why lambda variables are being substituted instead of the expected duplicate bindings.
I'll trace through the lambda variable name generation function, focusing on how the depth and index are transformed into a
printed character.
c
print_lam_var_name(f, depth + 1)
At depth 0, this becomes print_lam_var_name(f, 1), which prints 'a'. At depth 2, it would print 'c', matching the expected
output. The function decrements the input and maps it to lowercase letters, creating a systematic naming convention for
lambda variables based on depth.
The complex nested structure suggests the lambda's context and depth are crucial for determining its variable name, with the
depth of 2 explaining why 'c' is printed in this specific case. I'm tracking a subtle naming discrepancy in lambda term
printing. The lambda variable seems correct at depth=0, but something feels off about the variable names in the surrounding
context. The expected and actual outputs have slight differences that suggest a nuanced naming strategy within the quoted
book term. I need to carefully examine how depth influences variable generation and ensure consistent naming across
different levels of the term structure.
The core issue likely involves how the variable naming function interacts with different runtime contexts, potentially
sharing a counter that creates unexpected name mappings. This suggests a potential shared state problem in the variable
naming mechanism.
I'm noticing the naming function behaves differently when called in outer runtime terms versus the ALO book term generation.
The counter seems to increment inconsistently, causing variable names to diverge from the expected pattern.
The discrepancy emerges when comparing how print_lam_var_name generates names across different lambda term contexts,
revealing a subtle interaction between naming depth and counter management that produces unexpected variable labels.
The global naming scheme appears to track variable assignments across nested lambda terms, potentially maintaining state
between different term generations in a way that's not immediately obvious from the current implementation.
I'm tracking how variable names propagate through complex lambda calculus transformations, noting the intricate relationship
between input structure and output naming conventions. The pattern suggests a systematic approach to variable renaming that
preserves contextual information across nested lambda abstractions.
When @c2 is applied to @k2, the substitution reveals a nuanced reduction process where the inner lambda's structure remains
consistent while the outer context shifts. The key observation is how the substitution mechanism preserves the fundamental
lambda structure while updating specific variable bindings.
The β-reduction reveals an interesting mechanism of context transformation, where the initial lambda's body gets rewritten
based on the applied argument's characteristics. This suggests a deeper pattern of computational transformation that goes
beyond simple variable replacement.
The presence of multiple lambda layers implies a complex nested computation, where each lambda represents a distinct
computational stage with its own binding and reduction rules. The goal seems to be understanding how these nested lambdas
interact and reduce.
The global naming convention suggests a systematic approach to variable labeling, tracking lambda variables across different
computational contexts. This strategy allows for precise tracking of variable substitutions and transformations.
The evaluation process involves intricate lambda reductions, with each reduction potentially introducing new lambda
abstractions and modifying the computational state through specific binding mechanisms.
Inside the ALO (Abstract Lambda Object), the naming strategy requires maintaining a consistent lambda counter across
different nested computational layers. This means preserving the global lambda variable count when entering and processing
nested lambda terms, ensuring a coherent naming scheme that reflects the original term's structure.
The key observation is that lambda variables should be assigned sequentially, with the count continuing from the current
point rather than resetting based on depth. This approach ensures unique and predictable variable naming across complex
lambda term transformations.
⏺ I see the issue. The expected output uses a global naming scheme that continues across the whole term including inside ALOs.
Let me fix the ALO book printer to use the global counter.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 2 lines, removed 1 line
375 u32 idx = term_val(book);
376 if (idx < depth) {
377 // Refers to a binder inside the book term (quoted)
378 - print_lam_var_name(f, idx + 1);
378 + // Use the lambda name counter from depth-idx positions ago
379 + print_lam_var_name(f, P.lam_count - idx);
380 } else {
381 // Refers to the bind list
382 u32 adj_idx = idx - depth;
∴ Thinking…
I also need to update the CO0/CO1 case similarly, and update the LAM case to use the global counter.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 2 lines, removed 1 line
404 u32 lab = term_ext(book);
405 if (idx < depth) {
406 // Refers to a binder inside the book term (quoted)
407 - print_dup_var_name(f, idx + 1);
407 + // Use the dup name counter from depth-idx positions ago
408 + print_dup_var_name(f, P.dup_count - idx);
409 fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
410 } else {
411 // Refers to the bind list
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to update the LAM case to allocate a fresh name using the global counter.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 2 lines, removed 1 line
434 case LAM: {
435 u32 body_loc = term_val(book);
436 fputs("λ", f);
437 - print_lam_var_name(f, depth + 1);
437 + u32 nam = ++P.lam_count;
438 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
439 fputc('.', f);
440 print_alo_book_go(f, body_loc, ls_loc, depth + 1);
441 break;
∴ Thinking…
I also need to update the DUP case.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 2 lines, removed 1 line
444 u32 expr_loc = term_val(book);
445 u32 lab = term_ext(book);
446 fputs("!", f);
447 - print_dup_var_name(f, depth + 1);
447 + u32 nam = ++P.dup_count;
448 + print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
449 fputc('&', f);
450 print_name(f, lab);
451 fputc('=', f);
∴ Thinking…
Now let me compile and test again.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang && clang -O2 -o main main.c 2>&1)
⎿ (No content)
∴ Thinking…
Let me run the tests again.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude && ./clang/main test/snf_unscoped.hvm4 2>&1)
⎿ λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude && ./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4 2>&1)
⎿ λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
∴ Thinking…
Still the same output. The issue is that for CO0/CO1 inside the ALO book term that refer to the bind list (idx >= depth),
I'm correctly resolving them. But the output shows b and c which are lambda names, not dup names.Let me trace through more
carefully for snf_c2_k2:Expected inside ALO: &C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})
Actual inside ALO: &C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})
So:- λc.A₁ matches - B₁ matches- A₀ should be but we get b
- &K{C₀,A₁} expected but we get &K{C₀,c}So the CO0 that should print as A₀ is printing as b, and the CO1 that should print
as A₁ is printing as c.This means the CO0/CO1 are going through the idx >= depth branch (they're referring to the bind
list), and then the bind_loc they find has !term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc]) which means it's an unsubstituted variable. And we're
calling print_lam_name(bind_loc) which gives a lambda name.
But CO0/CO1 should use print_dup_name, not print_lam_name. Let me check my code...
Looking at the CO0/CO1 case in print_alo_book_go:
if (ls != 0) {
u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32); if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0); } else {
u32 nam = print_dup_name(bind_loc); print_dup_var_name(f, nam); print_dup_discover(bind_loc, lab);
fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f); }
}
I'm investigating why the subscript isn't appearing, despite using the correct print functions. The code looks correct, but
the output suggests something is missing. I need to trace the exact path of how these names are being generated and printed.
The key observation is that b and c are printed without subscripts, indicating they're taking a different route through the
printing mechanism. This suggests the book term might contain VAR nodes instead of the expected CO0/CO1 nodes. In the
interaction calculus, VAR and CO0/CO1 have distinct semantic meanings - VAR points to a lambda, while CO0/CO1 refers to a
duplication.
I'll need to carefully examine the book term's structure to understand why VAR nodes are appearing where I expected
duplication nodes.
The bind list actually contains a mix of lambda and duplication bindings, created during the ALO generation. This means a
VAR with a specific index could potentially reference a duplication binding instead of a lambda, which could explain the
unexpected node behavior.
The bind entry for a lambda specifically encodes the lambda body location, revealing an interesting semantic detail about
how bindings are structured in this system.
I allocate a new heap location for the duplicate value, creating a bind entry that combines the duplicated value's location
with the current lexical scope location. This follows a consistent pattern of binding representation across different
language constructs.
The mechanism ensures that variable lookups can efficiently traverse and resolve lexical bindings by maintaining a linked
structure of references and locations.
When resolving variables or constructors, the system checks for existing bindings, falling back to default index-based
representations if no prior binding exists. This allows flexible and dynamic handling of lexical scoping and variable
references.
The core challenge emerges when attempting to distinguish between lambda and duplicate bindings during term printing. The
current approach relies on separate naming functions for different term types, but this strategy breaks down when a
variable's index unexpectedly references a binding from a different context.
I need a more robust mechanism to correctly identify and print bindings, ensuring semantic accuracy across different term
representations. The existing method risks misclassifying variable origins, potentially leading to incorrect term
visualization.
The unexpected output suggests a deeper issue with how binding indices are being interpreted and mapped during the printing
process. Something in the current logic is causing a mismatch between the expected and actual term representation.
I'm noticing the lambda variable names are being printed without their expected subscripts, which indicates a potential
problem in how variable references are being resolved and displayed. The core problem seems to be that VAR nodes are being
incorrectly substituted where CO0/CO1 nodes should appear.
The discrepancy points to a subtle error in tracking de Bruijn indices, particularly at the top-level binding depth where
indices should directly correspond to the binding structure.
I need to investigate whether the book term's actual structure matches my current interpretation, as the VAR nodes suggest
either a misunderstanding of the term's composition or an issue in how variables are being mapped and represented during
processing.
The discrepancy between expected and actual output centers on the second SUP_C's structure, with unexpected variable
placements that deviate from the anticipated CO0 and CO1 positions. This hints at potential indirection or transformation
happening during term reading or dispatching.
My next step is to carefully trace how the book term is being retrieved and parsed, checking if the tm_loc location truly
contains the expected term structure or if some intermediate transformation is occurring.
The key insight is the distinction between VAR and CO_ terms relies on their EXT field, not just their tag. This subtle
difference could explain the unexpected variable substitutions I'm observing.
I need to investigate how the parser is generating these nodes, particularly where VAR might be incorrectly used instead of
CO0/CO1. The discrepancy between expected and actual output suggests a potential issue in the term creation process.
The parsing or ALO creation code likely contains the root cause of these misplaced variables. My next step is to carefully
examine those sections to understand why lowercase variables are appearing where uppercase duplicated variables should be.
The pattern reveals an inconsistent node generation: some positions correctly generate CO1 nodes, while others incorrectly
produce VAR nodes. This suggests a localized problem in the parsing or transformation logic.
Specifically, the second elements within nested structures consistently fail - the first element of the second SUP becomes b
instead of A₀, and the second element of the inner SUP becomes c instead of A₁. This indicates a potential systematic issue
with handling nested node transformations.
The problem seems rooted in how book term locations and bind lists are being processed during iteration, particularly when
passing tm_loc as the book term location. The current method of traversing the structure appears to mishandle index mapping
or variable substitution in these nested contexts.
I'll need to carefully trace the memory access patterns, especially how the 64-bit pair is being split into low and high
32-bit components for book term and bind list locations. The potential mismatch could be causing unexpected behavior in term
evaluation.
Debugging output will help clarify the exact memory addresses and term structures being accessed during this complex
traversal.
However, given the user's explicit instruction to not solve the issue independently, the most appropriate action is to
report the current observations and seek direct guidance about the unexpected output and potential memory access
complications.
The key observation is the truncated output λa.#Tup{b, which suggests something is interrupting or incorrectly processing
the term expansion.
I'll compile the specific discrepancies between the generated and expected outputs, highlighting the structural differences
in variable names and lambda abstractions, and request the user's insight on resolving these parsing anomalies.
The key variations involve nested lambda expressions, variable substitutions, and subtle structural transformations within
complex computational representations. Precise alignment requires careful examination of each lambda term's internal
composition and external mapping.
⏺ I've implemented the changes and run the tests. Here are the results:
snf_unscoped.hvm4:
- Expected: λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
- Actual: λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
snf_c2_k2.hvm4:
- Expected: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
- Actual: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
I have a few questions/blockers:
1. snf_unscoped: Missing outer lambda - The expected output has λa.λb.#Tup{...} (two lambdas) but the source only has λk.
(one lambda). Where does the second lambda come from? The ! F = λx; creates an UNS node which evaluates to t(λy.λ$x.y, $x),
but I don't see how this produces a second outer lambda.
2. snf_c2_k2: VAR vs CO0/CO1 inside ALO - Inside the ALO book term @{...}, some positions that should print as dup vars
(like A₀, A₁) are printing as lambda vars (b, c). This suggests the book term has VAR nodes where I expected CO0/CO1 nodes.
Is this correct behavior in the book term, or is there an issue with how the book term was constructed?
3. Trailing semicolon - The floating dup printer adds a ; after each dup, resulting in a trailing ; at the end. Should the
trailing semicolon be omitted?
4. Variable naming scheme - For the snf_unscoped test, the expected output shows d for the unscoped variable, but my output
shows b. The expected output also shows λc.λd.c for F while mine shows λc.λb.c. Should the unscoped variable naming use a
different counter than regular lambdas, or should they share the same global counter?
Please clarify these points so I can proceed correctly.
> 1. my tests were wrong. the correct outputs are:
λa.#Tup{c,λb.λc.b,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})}
(or alpha equivalent)
2. see above.
3. whatever makes the simplest code
4. they should both share the same global counter.
ultrathink
∴ Thinking…
The user clarified that:
1. The expected outputs were wrong, and the correct ones are:
- snf_unscoped: λa.#Tup{c,λb.λc.b,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
- snf_c2_k2: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})}
2. The VAR vs CO0/CO1 inside ALO is correct behavior.
3. Trailing semicolon - whatever makes simplest code.
4. Lambda and unscoped variables share the same global counter.
Let me compare my actual output to the new expected output:
snf_unscoped:
- Expected: λa.#Tup{c,λb.λc.b,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
- Actual: λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
The difference is in the variable naming inside the Tup:
- Expected: {c,λb.λc.b,...}
- Actual: {b,λc.λb.c,...}
The user said "or alpha equivalent", so these might be equivalent just with different naming. Let me check:
Expected: #Tup{c,λb.λc.b,A₀,A₁,λd.d}
- c is an unscoped var
- λb.λc.b is F (a lambda that returns its outer bound var)
- A₀,A₁ are dup vars
- λd.d is identity
Actual: #Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}
- b is the unscoped var
- λc.λb.c is F (but this returns the inner bound var c... wait that's wrong)
Wait, λb.λc.b returns b (the outer binding), but λc.λb.c returns c (the outer binding in this version).
I'll carefully analyze the lambda structures to understand their behavior and potential equivalence.
The outer lambda's binding and return value differ between the two expressions. One returns the outer b, the other the outer
c. Despite initial appearances, they exhibit similar structural characteristics when examining variable scoping and binding
patterns.
The key distinction lies in how the unscoped variable relates to the lambda function's structure. I need to trace how the
variable interactions map between the expected and actual representations.
The global counter's role seems critical in determining variable naming and scope. I'll need to carefully examine how the
first bound variable gets selected and how the unscoped construct interacts with lambda bindings.
The code snippet suggests there's a deeper mechanism in the wnf_uns function for handling unscoped terms, with an iteration
counter ITRS potentially playing a significant role in variable resolution.
The transformation looks like it creates a complex lambda structure where the body is applied to a nested lambda
construction, with strategic variable placement ensuring proper substitution and binding.
I'm tracking how x_var and x_lam relate: x_var is a variable referencing the location where x_lam's body will be
constructed, creating an intricate variable reference mechanism that allows precise lambda term manipulation.
The key observation is how the variable and lambda creation interplay, with each term carefully positioned to enable the
desired transformation of the original function binding.
When evaluating, the process unfolds through specific stages: first receiving y_lam (the outer function), then receiving
x_var as the escaped variable. This demonstrates the complex scoping and variable resolution happening during the evaluation
process.
The test case reveals the intricate mechanics of function and variable interactions, showing how x becomes a variable that
can escape its original binding context.
The printing mechanism introduces nuanced challenges around global counter assignment, particularly when dealing with
unscoped variables and nested lambda expressions. The order of printing becomes critical in determining variable naming and
tracking.
When an unscoped variable and a lambda share the same memory location, print_lam_name() consistently returns the same name.
This means the inner lambda's variable would match the unscoped variable's name, creating an intriguing naming
synchronization across different parts of the expression.
The counter progression reveals a specific sequence: first the outer lambda receives a name, then the unscoped variable,
followed by subsequent nested lambda expressions, each potentially inheriting naming characteristics based on shared memory
locations.
The output demonstrates this complex naming mechanism, where variables like 'b' can be reused across different lambda
contexts while maintaining a consistent internal logic of name assignment.
I'll focus on removing the trailing semicolon in the test file and floating dup printer, ensuring the code remains clean and
consistent. The key steps involve carefully updating the test configurations to match the expected output, which will help
validate the lambda calculus transformation process.
The modifications will streamline the representation, making the code more precise and eliminating unnecessary punctuation
that doesn't contribute to the semantic meaning.
⏺ Got it. Let me update the test files with the correct expected outputs and fix the trailing semicolon.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/test/snf_unscoped.hvm4)
⎿ Added 1 line, removed 1 line
2 ! F = λx; // creates an unbound lam/var pair: F = λa.$x.a and x = $x
3 ! K &L = k; // clones k with a &L label
4 #Tup{x, F, K₀, K₁, λv.v}
5 - //!λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
5 + //!λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
∴ Thinking…
Now let me update snf_c2_k2.hvm4. The expected output is without trailing semicolon.
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4)
⎿ Added 1 line, removed 1 line
1 @c2 = λs. !S0&C=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
2 @k2 = λs. !S0&K=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
3 @main = @c2(@k2)
4 - //!λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
4 + //!λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})}
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to fix the trailing semicolon. Looking at my current output, it has a trailing ; from the floating dup printer.
Let me look at that code and fix it.
Currently:
fn void print_floating_dups(FILE *f, u8 quoted) {
while (P.dup_head < P.dup_tail) {
u32 loc = P.dup_queue[P.dup_head++];
Term val = HEAP[loc];
if (term_sub(val)) {
continue;
}
u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
u32 lab = P.dup_labs[loc & 0xFFFF];
fputc('!', f);
print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
fputc('&', f);
print_name(f, lab);
fputc('=', f);
print_term_go(f, val, quoted);
fputc(';', f);
}
}
Since the user said "whatever makes the simplest code", I think it's simpler to leave the trailing semicolon for consistency
(every dup ends with ;). But the expected output doesn't have the trailing semicolon.
Actually, let me re-check the expected output:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})}
vs my output:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
I'm noticing some inconsistency in the test cases. The first test has a trailing semicolon, but the second test seems
different. This suggests the semicolon handling might not be straightforward.
The tests appear to have conflicting expectations about the trailing semicolon placement. I'll need to investigate further
to understand the precise requirements for semicolon formatting across different scenarios.
The pattern seems more nuanced than initially assumed, with semicolons potentially serving different purposes in different
contexts of these lambda expressions.
For the complex expression !A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{...}, each duplicate assignment is followed by a semicolon, except the
final one. This suggests a structured syntax where semicolons separate sequential duplicate declarations, but aren't
required after the last declaration.
The #Tup{...}!A&L=a; example reinforces this observation, showing a semicolon after a specific assignment, potentially
indicating a delimiter between different structural components or declarations.
These semicolon placements appear systematic, not random, hinting at an underlying grammatical rule in this lambda calculus
or type system representation. I notice a pattern of floating dups with varying semicolon placement across different test
cases. The inconsistency seems deliberate, with some expressions ending with a semicolon and others not. The key observation
is the structural difference in how these floating dups are represented, particularly in the ALO (Abstract Linear Object)
content and termination syntax.
The main variations appear centered around the placement of the semicolon after floating dups, which suggests a nuanced
parsing approach might be necessary to handle these different output formats consistently. I'm tracing the print order
carefully, focusing on how the unscoped variable and lambda function are positioned in the tuple. The key discrepancy
appears to be the sequence of elements and their representation. My current understanding suggests the order of printing is
critical, with the unscoped variable potentially influencing the lambda function's structure. I need to verify whether the
variable x is printed before or after the lambda elements, as this could explain the structural difference between the
expected and actual outputs.
The specific point of interest is how the tuple's first two elements - the unscoped variable and the lambda function - are
being processed and rendered. The variation between {c,λb.λc.b} and {b,λc.λb.c} hints at a nuanced ordering mechanism that
requires precise examination. I see a potential solution involving the order of name assignment. The key insight is to
assign names sequentially based on lambda nesting, prioritizing outer lambdas first. This means when traversing the lambda
expression, we'd assign names from the outermost lambda inward, ensuring consistent and predictable naming. The
location-based naming strategy needs refinement to capture the desired variable scoping behavior, potentially tracking
lambda depth and assigning names accordingly. I see a complex naming sequence emerging from the lambda structure. The print
order suggests x appears before F, but lambda naming seems counterintuitive. The convention might involve naming from
outermost to innermost lambdas, independent of actual print sequence. This implies the inner unscoped lambda gets 'c', while
the outer lambda receives 'b', creating an unexpected but systematic naming pattern that doesn't strictly follow sequential
processing order. Alpha equivalence means the structural binding remains consistent, even if variable names differ. The key
is preserving the lambda structure and scoping relationships between variables. The unscoped variable and inner lambda
share a binding pattern, while maintaining distinct lambda contexts. Checking the output reveals minor syntactic differences
that don't alter the fundamental lambda calculus representation.
The floating duplicate expression presents a nuanced formatting challenge. Trailing semicolon placement impacts the
expression's visual representation without changing its semantic meaning. Potential strategies involve consistent semicolon
usage or context-specific insertion, balancing code readability with precise output matching.
The expected outputs reveal subtle differences across different scenarios. Some expressions require a trailing semicolon,
while others omit it, suggesting context-dependent formatting rules. I'll adapt the code to precisely match the specified
output formats, ensuring exact replication of the expected syntax.
The key principle is simplicity: choose the implementation that minimizes code complexity. In this case, consistently adding
a trailing semicolon after each floating duplicate appears to be the most straightforward approach. This means
systematically appending ; to each expression, creating a uniform output structure.
I'll carefully review the user's guidance about selecting the simplest implementation strategy, focusing on maintaining code
clarity and minimal cognitive overhead.
The goal is to align the code generation with the specified expected outputs, ensuring precise matching while preserving the
fundamental simplicity of the approach.
⏺ Now let me check if the trailing semicolon needs to be removed to match. Let me compile and run the tests.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang && clang -O2 -o main main.c 2>&1)
⎿ (No content)
∴ Thinking…
Good, compilation succeeded. Let me run the tests.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude && ./clang/main test/snf_unscoped.hvm4 2>&1)
⎿ λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude && ./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4 2>&1)
⎿ λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
∴ Thinking…
Now let me compare:
snf_unscoped:
- Expected: λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
- Actual: λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
- MATCH!
snf_c2_k2:- Expected: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})}
- Actual: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
- MISMATCH: trailing ;
I need to remove the trailing semicolon for snf_c2_k2. But wait, snf_unscoped expects the trailing ; and it matches. So the
expected outputs have:- snf_unscoped: ...!A&L=a; (with trailing ;)
- snf_c2_k2: ...!C&C=@{...}})} (without trailing ;)
This is inconsistent. But the user provided these exact outputs, so let me just update snf_c2_k2 to include the trailing ;
since my code is simpler that way.
Actually, let me re-check the user's message. They said:
1. my tests were wrong. the correct outputs are:
λa.#Tup{c,λb.λc.b,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})}
(or alpha equivalent)
I'll analyze the alpha equivalence and semicolon placement carefully. The user suggests flexibility with the trailing
semicolon, mentioning "or alpha equivalent" and "whatever makes the simplest code". Since my implementation consistently
adds semicolons after floating duplications, I'll modify the test expectations to match this approach. This means updating
the test file to expect the trailing semicolon for both test cases, maintaining consistency with my implementation's
behavior.
⏺ The snf_unscoped test matches. For snf_c2_k2, I just need to add the trailing ; to the expected output (since my code is
simpler with it always included).
⏺ Update(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4)
⎿ Added 1 line, removed 1 line
1 @c2 = λs. !S0&C=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
2 @k2 = λs. !S0&K=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
3 @main = @c2(@k2)
4 - //!λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})}
4 + //!λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
∴ Thinking…
Now let me verify both tests pass.
⏺ Now let me verify both tests match their expected outputs.
⏺ Bash(echo "=== snf_unscoped ===" && ./clang/main test/snf_unscoped.hvm4 && echo "" && echo "=== snf_c2_k2 ===" &&
./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4)
⎿ === snf_unscoped ===
λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
=== snf_c2_k2 ===
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
∴ Thinking…
Both tests produce the expected output. Let me compare:snf_unscoped:- Expected: λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;-
Actual: λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
- MATCH ✓
snf_c2_k2:- Expected: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
- Actual: λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
- MATCH ✓
Now let me update the todo list and report the results. The user said not to run the old tests yet, so I'll just report that
the new tests match.
⏺ Both tests now produce the expected output:
snf_unscoped:
λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
snf_c2_k2:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
∴ Thinking…
All tasks are completed. Let me provide a summary to the user.
Summary of changes:
1. print/term.c: Complete rewrite with:
- Global naming scheme using PrintState struct with lam_names, dup_names maps
- Lambda vars are lowercase (a, b, c, ...), dup vars are uppercase (A, B, C, ...)
- Floating dup tracking and printing after main term
- Substitution chasing (print_chase function)
- ALO book term printing with depth tracking (print_alo_book_go)
- print_term() uses non-quoted mode, print_term_quoted() uses quoted mode
2. snf/_.c: Added quoted parameter:
- snf_go(term, depth, quoted) - internal function
- snf(term, depth) - non-quoted mode (new default)
- snf_quoted(term, depth) - quoted mode (preserves current behavior for collapse)
3. collapse/flatten.c: Uses snf_quoted() and print_term_quoted() to preserve existing behavior
4. test/all.sh: Added support for //! tests (non-collapsed mode)
5. test/snf_unscoped.hvm4: New test file for unscoped lambdas and floating dups
6. test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4: New test file for ALO printing
The user said not to run the old tests yet. Some may break due to the printer changes, and they'll let me know which ones
are actually wrong vs just need syntax updates.
⏺ All tasks completed. Here's a summary of the changes:
Summary of Changes
1. print/term.c - Complete rewrite
- Global naming scheme: Uses PrintState struct with maps for lambda names (lam_names) and dup names (dup_names)
- Lambda vars: lowercase a, b, c, ... (using global counter)
- Dup vars: uppercase A, B, C, ... (using separate global counter)
- Floating dup tracking: CO0/CO1 vars discover their parent dups, which are printed after the main term
- Substitution chasing: print_chase() follows substitution chains before printing
- ALO book term printing: print_alo_book_go() with depth tracking for quoted/unquoted variable resolution
- Two modes: print_term() (non-quoted) and print_term_quoted() (quoted)
2. snf/_.c - Added quoted parameter
- snf_go(term, depth, quoted) - internal function with mode
- snf(term, depth) - non-quoted mode (doesn't substitute λ-bound vars)
- snf_quoted(term, depth) - quoted mode (substitutes with NAM, returns book-style LAMs)
3. collapse/flatten.c
- Uses snf_quoted() and print_term_quoted() to preserve existing collapse behavior
4. test/_all_.sh
- Added support for //! prefix indicating non-collapsed mode tests
5. New test files
- test/snf_unscoped.hvm4 - tests unscoped lambdas and floating dups
- test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4 - tests ALO printing with substitutions
As you requested, I did not run the old tests. They may break due to the printer changes (different syntax for variable
names, floating dups, etc.).
> great job. now, run all the old tests, and let me know which tests fail. also evaluate whether they're actual failures,
or
just differences in printing. explain your reasoning. do not change the tests.
∴ Thinking…
The user wants me to run all the old tests and analyze which ones fail. I need to determine if failures are actual semantic
errors or just differences in the new printing format.
Let me run the test suite and analyze the results.
⏺ Bash(./test/_all_.sh 2>&1)
⎿ Error: Exit code 1
=== Testing C ===
[PASS] autodup_1
[PASS] autodup_2
[PASS] autodup_3
[PASS] autodup_4
[FAIL] autodup_bound_vars
expected: [[[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λa.[20,a]]],[[[1,[2,3]],[1,[2,3]]],[[[1,[2,3]],[1,[2,3]]],[[1,[2,3]],[1,[
,3]]]]],[[101,102],[101,102],[101,102]]]
detected: [[[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λb.[20,a]],[10,λc.[20,a]]],[[[1,[2,3]],[1,[2,3]]],[[[1,[2,3]],[1,[2,3]]],[[1,[2,3]],[1,[
,3]]]]],[[101,102],[101,102],[101,102]]]
[PASS] autodup_deep
[PASS] autodup_dup_dyn_3each
[PASS] autodup_dup_dyn_both
[PASS] autodup_dup_dyn
[PASS] autodup_dup_static_3each
[PASS] autodup_dup_static_both
[PASS] autodup_dup_static
[PASS] autodup_let
[PASS] autodup_many
[PASS] autodup_mat_lam
[PASS] autodup_mixed
[PASS] autodup_nested_lam
[FAIL] autodup_nightmare
expected: λa.λb.λc.λd.λe.[[[a(d,b(λf.f(c,e))),λf.[f,a(d,b(λg.g(c,d)))]],b(e),a(d,[a(d,b(λf.f(c,e))),λf.[f,a(d,b(λg.g(c,
)))]])],[[a(d,b(λf.f(c,e))),λf.[f,a(d,b(λg.g(c,d)))]],b(e),a(d,[a(d,b(λf.f(c,e))),λf.[f,a(d,b(λg.g(c,d)))]])],[[a(d,b(λf.
(c,e))),λf.[f,a(d,b(λg.g(c,d)))]],b(e),a(d,[a(d,b(λf.f(c,e))),λf.[f,a(d,b(λg.g(c,d)))]])]]
detected: λa.λb.λc.λd.λe.[[[a(d,b(λf.f(c,e))),λg.[f,a(d,b(λh.g(c,d)))]],b(e),a(d,[a(d,b(λi.f(c,e))),λj.[f,a(d,b(λk.g(c,
)))]])],[[a(d,b(λl.f(c,e))),λm.[f,a(d,b(λn.g(c,d)))]],b(e),a(d,[a(d,b(λo.f(c,e))),λp.[f,a(d,b(λq.g(c,d)))]])],[[a(d,b(λl.
(c,e))),λm.[f,a(d,b(λn.g(c,d)))]],b(e),a(d,[a(d,b(λo.f(c,e))),λp.[f,a(d,b(λq.g(c,d)))]])]]
[PASS] autodup_outer_ref
[PASS] autodup_strict
[PASS] autodup_sup_mix
[PASS] autodup_value_path
[PASS] c2_not_t
[PASS] c8_k8_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c1_c1_not
[PASS] cadd_c1_c4_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c1_c4
[PASS] cadd_c2_c1
[PASS] cadd_c2_c2
[PASS] cadd_c2_c4_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c4_c1_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c4_c1
[PASS] cadd_c4_c2_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c4_c4
[PASS] cmul_c4_c2_not_t
[PASS] cmul_c4_c2
[PASS] cmul_c4_c4_not_t
[PASS] cmul_c4_c4
[PASS] cnot_not
[PASS] cnot_true
[PASS] collapse_0
[PASS] collapse_1
[PASS] collapse_2
[PASS] collapse_3
[PASS] collapse_4
[PASS] collapse_5
[PASS] collapse_6
[PASS] collapse_7
[PASS] collapse_8
[PASS] collapse_9
[PASS] collapse_era_ctr
[PASS] collapse_era_deep
[PASS] collapse_era_multi_ctr
[PASS] collapse_era_nested
[PASS] collapse_era_pair
[PASS] collapse_era
[FAIL] collapse_supgen_mul
expected: λa.λb.λc.λ{0n:0n;1n+:λd.a(c,b(c,d))}
λa.λb.λ{0n:λc.0n;1n+:λc.λd.a(d,b(c,d))}
λa.λb.λ{0n:λ{0n:0n;1n+:λc.0n};1n+:λc.λd.a(d,b(c,d))}
λa.λb.λ{0n:λ{0n:1n;1n+:λc.0n};1n+:λc.λd.a(d,b(c,d))}
detected: λa.λb.λc.λ{0n:0n;1n+:λd.a(c,b(c,d))}
λa.λb.λ{0n:λc.0n;1n+:λd.λe.a(d,b(c,d))}
λa.λb.λ{0n:λ{0n:0n;1n+:λc.0n};1n+:λd.λe.a(d,b(c,d))}
λa.λb.λ{0n:λ{0n:1n;1n+:λc.0n};1n+:λd.λe.a(d,b(c,d))}
[PASS] dup_affine_bare
[PASS] dup_affine_cloned
[PASS] dup_affine_co0
[PASS] dup_affine_co1
[PASS] dup_affine_shadow_ok
[PASS] dup_affine_valid
[PASS] dup_fresh
[PASS] dyn_dup_nested
[PASS] dyn_dup_sup
[PASS] enum_bits
[PASS] enum_nat
[PASS] eql_app_fun
[PASS] eql_ctr_empty
[PASS] eql_ctr_f1
[PASS] eql_ctr_f2
[PASS] eql_ctr_t
[PASS] eql_dup
[PASS] eql_lam_f
[PASS] eql_lam_nested_f
[PASS] eql_lam_nested
[PASS] eql_lam_t
[PASS] eql_list_f
[PASS] eql_list_t
[PASS] eql_mixed_f
[PASS] eql_nat_f
[PASS] eql_nat_t
[PASS] eql_nested
[PASS] eql_num_f
[PASS] eql_num_t
[PASS] eql_ref
[PASS] eql_str_f
[PASS] eql_str_t
[PASS] eql_sup
[PASS] factorial
[PASS] fibo
[PASS] fork_dynamic
[PASS] fork_static
[PASS] fuse_inc
[PASS] lam_dup_auto
[PASS] lam_dup_dyn
[PASS] lam_dup_static
[PASS] lam_dup_sup
[PASS] lambda_eval
[PASS] let
[PASS] long_name_def
[PASS] long_name_no_collision
[PASS] long_name_undef
[PASS] map
[PASS] match_0
[PASS] match_1
[PASS] match_2
[PASS] match_3
[PASS] match_4
[PASS] match_5
[PASS] mul2_4
[PASS] multiarg_cloned
[PASS] multiarg_inline_dup
[PASS] multiarg_mixed
[PASS] multiarg_simple
[PASS] pair_swap
[PASS] parser
[PASS] prim_add
[PASS] prim_and
[PASS] prim_div
[PASS] prim_dup
[PASS] prim_eq_f
[PASS] prim_eq_t
[PASS] prim_ge_f
[PASS] prim_ge_t
[PASS] prim_gt_f
[PASS] prim_gt_t
[PASS] prim_le_f
[PASS] prim_le_t
[PASS] prim_lsh
[PASS] prim_lt_f
[PASS] prim_lt_t
[PASS] prim_mod
[PASS] prim_mul
[PASS] prim_ne_f
[PASS] prim_ne_t
[PASS] prim_not
[PASS] prim_or
[PASS] prim_rsh
[PASS] prim_sp0
[PASS] prim_sp1
[PASS] prim_sub
[PASS] prim_sup
[PASS] prim_xor
[PASS] print_mat_default
[PASS] print_mat_lst
[PASS] print_mat_nat
[PASS] print_mat
[PASS] print_swi
[PASS] red_add_stuck_a
[PASS] red_add_stuck_b
[PASS] red_and_ff
[PASS] red_and_stuck_a
[PASS] red_and_stuck_b
[PASS] red_and_tf
[PASS] red_and_tt
[PASS] red_dbl_stuck
[PASS] red_dbl
[PASS] red_dup
[PASS] red_foo
[PASS] red_foo2
[PASS] red_id
[PASS] red_not
[PASS] red_not2
[PASS] red_prd_direct
[PASS] red_prd
[PASS] red_simple
[PASS] red_sum_stuck
[PASS] red_sum
[PASS] regression_autodup_3uses_recursive
[PASS] scoped_var_both
[PASS] scoped_var
[PASS] snf_c2_k2
[PASS] snf_unscoped
[PASS] sugar_chr
[PASS] sugar_cons
[PASS] sugar_lst
[PASS] sugar_mat_lst
[PASS] sugar_mat_nat
[PASS] sugar_nat_plus
[PASS] sugar_nat
[PASS] sugar_nil
[PASS] sugar_str
[PASS] sum_4
[PASS] unicode_char
[PASS] unicode_cjk
[PASS] unicode_emoji
[PASS] unicode_greek
[PASS] unicode_mixed
[PASS] unicode_string
[PASS] unscoped_callcc
[PASS] unscoped_mut_ref
[FAIL] unscoped_nested
expected: λa.a
λa.λb.1
λa.λb._
detected: λa.a
λa.λb.1
λa.λb.c
[PASS] unscoped_queue
[FAIL] unscoped_var
expected: λa.1
λa._
detected: λa.1
λa.b
[PASS] unscoped
∴ Thinking…
Let me analyze each failing test:
1. autodup_bound_vars
- Expected: [[[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λa.[20,a]]],...
- Detected: [[[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λb.[20,a]],[10,λc.[20,a]]],...
The difference is that each lambda is getting a unique name (λa, λb, λc) instead of all being λa.
This is a printing difference. In the old printer, lambdas were named based on depth (de Bruijn style), so identical lambdas
at the same depth would all get the same name. In the new printer, each lambda gets a globally unique name.
Semantically, these lambdas are copies of the same lambda, but they're at different heap locations, so they get different
names. The key question is: does the body variable correctly refer to the binding lambda?
Looking at:
- Expected: λa.[20,a] - body uses a
- Detected: λb.[20,a] - body uses a but lambda is λb
Wait, this is WRONG! The lambda is λb but its body references a instead of b. This is a real bug.
Actually wait, let me look more carefully. The structure is:
- [10, λa.[20,a]] - a pair with 10 and a lambda
- [10, λb.[20,a]] - a pair with 10 and a lambda that SHOULD use b in its body
So the lambda λb should have body [20,b], not [20,a]. This is an actual failure - the variable naming is broken.
Hmm, but wait. Maybe these are the same lambda (sharing the same heap location for the body). Let me think...
If each lambda instance has a distinct body location, this suggests a deeper issue with variable binding and name resolution
during lambda duplication. The inconsistent variable references indicate a potential problem in how bound variables are
tracked and renamed across lambda copies.
The naming discrepancy reveals that the current implementation fails to maintain consistent variable scoping when
duplicating lambdas, which could lead to incorrect program semantics. I'm investigating a subtle variable binding issue
during lambda duplication. The test case reveals that when lambdas are cloned, their internal variable references aren't
correctly updated. Each duplicated lambda still points to the original lambda's binding, causing incorrect variable scoping.
This suggests a potential problem in how bound variables are handled during the duplication process, specifically in the
interaction net semantics or the implementation of lambda cloning.
The key observation is that while the lambdas are visually different (named a, b, c), their internal variable references
remain stuck to the first lambda's binding. This indicates a deeper issue with variable tracking during lambda duplication
that needs careful examination.
The potential root cause seems related to how lambda locations are mapped to names, with a bitwise masking operation that
might introduce collisions or incorrect name assignments in certain heap configurations.
The naming mechanism relies on tracking lambda body locations, where each lambda's location serves as a unique identifier.
When referencing variables within lambda bodies, the same location value determines the name assignment, creating a
potential naming consistency challenge across different lambda and variable contexts.
This approach means lambda and variable names could inadvertently share identifiers, especially when heap locations exceed
the 16-bit range limitation imposed by the current bitwise masking strategy.
The runtime behavior suggests a potential bug where variables might incorrectly reference the first lambda's location
instead of their respective lambda locations. This misalignment could cause unexpected naming conflicts during term printing
and evaluation.
The investigation requires deeper examination of the quoted mode printing mechanism and how location tracking interacts with
variable name resolution across different lambda expressions.
Tracing the output reveals a pattern: each lambda has a unique name, but all variables consistently print as 'a', indicating
a possible systematic issue in location mapping or variable referencing.
I'll investigate two potential explanations for this behavior. First, I'll check if all variables are somehow pointing to
the same lambda body location. Then, I'll examine potential hash masking effects that might cause unexpected location
collisions, systematically testing different heap memory scenarios to understand the underlying mechanism.
The mask calculation suggests no immediate collision, but I'll continue probing edge cases where memory locations might
interact unexpectedly with the bitwise masking operation.
The key insight emerges when comparing the expected output: all lambdas are identically named λa, which points to a
fundamental implementation issue in how these lambda structures are being generated or compared.
The naming discrepancy stems from different printing approaches - the old method used depth-based naming where lambdas at
the same depth received identical names, while the new method aims for globally unique names. However, the internal variable
references remain problematic.
I suspect the core problem lies in how lambda bodies are duplicated, potentially causing shared heap locations that create
identical variable references across multiple lambda instances. This suggests a deeper issue with how lambda terms are being
automatically replicated or shared during the generation process.
The investigation points to a potential cloning bug where variable references aren't correctly updated, causing unexpected
name sharing between lambda bodies. This inconsistency becomes apparent when comparing the old and new printing mechanisms.
The old printer handled lambda naming and variable resolution differently, using depth-based naming and representing
unresolved variables as underscores. The current focus is on understanding how substitution occurs during the snf (strong
normal form) process, particularly in quoted mode where bound variables should be replaced with specific names.
I'm tracing the substitution mechanism to pinpoint exactly where the naming resolution might be breaking down, examining the
interaction between lambda cloning and variable reference updates.
The key observation is that in collapse mode, variables should transform into named references using a depth-based naming
strategy, with each substitution creating a unique identifier based on the current lambda's depth.
The printing mechanisms for lambda variables and named references currently use different encoding methods, which creates
inconsistent naming. One uses lowercase letters sequentially, while the other employs a nick alphabet approach that starts
with an underscore.
I'll need to verify the nick alphabet's full character mapping to ensure consistent name generation across different term
types, particularly focusing on how small depth values are converted to character representations.
The key observation is that while both methods seem to generate 'a' for depth 1, there might be subtle differences in how
they handle edge cases or extended depth ranges that could cause unexpected naming conflicts.
I need to ensure the lambda variable name generation consistently matches the lambda's depth, especially in quoted mode
where the external field is set to depth+1. The current implementation using print_lam_name(loc) might not align with the
expected behavior when depth changes.
The old printer's approach suggests using the current depth directly for naming, which could provide more consistent results
across different term representations.
I'll modify the printer to switch between location-based and depth-based naming based on the quoted parameter, ensuring the
NAM generation matches the lambda's context precisely.
For quoted mode, I need to replace location-based naming with depth-based naming. This means using the current depth (ext)
instead of the term's location when generating names for lambdas and variables.
The key change is in the LAM case: instead of using print_lam_name(loc), I'll use the current depth to generate names. This
ensures the naming strategy matches the de Bruijn encoding used in quoted terms, maintaining the structural integrity of the
representation.
I'll need to carefully adjust the printing logic to handle both naming modes seamlessly, using the quoted parameter as a
switch between location and depth-based approaches. I'll track depth for quoted mode by reintroducing the depth parameter.
The strategy involves creating a clean, two-mode approach for naming:
Quoted mode requires careful depth tracking, using term_ext() for lambda and name annotations. Non-quoted mode will continue
using location-based unique naming.
I'll implement a targeted fix focusing on three key modifications:
1. Restore depth parameter specifically for quoted contexts
2. Use term_ext() for naming in quoted mode
3. Maintain location-based naming in standard mode
The other test cases - autodup_nightmare and collapse_supgen_mul - suggest a systemic naming consistency problem. These
tests reveal similar lambda variable naming challenges that my proposed approach should resolve.
The solution aims to balance simplicity with precise variable tracking across different parsing contexts. In line 3, an
unresolved variable reveals a discrepancy between old and new code printing behaviors. The old implementation used _ for
unsubstituted variables, while the new code prints a specific name like c. For collapsed/quoted mode, the goal is to align
with the original approach of printing unresolved variables as _.
The current implementation chases substitutions via print_chase, so if a variable remains unresolved after this process, it
should be printed as an underscore in quoted mode. This requires modifying the VAR case handling to check the substitution
state and print accordingly.
The key distinction is between quoted and non-quoted modes: in quoted mode, unscoped or escaped variables that couldn't be
resolved should print as _, while in non-quoted mode, bound variables should print with their lambda's name. This ensures
consistent representation across different contexts.
The proposed fix involves simple modifications to the printing logic for VAR, CO0, and CO1 cases, maintaining the original
code's approach of using _ or _₀/_₁ for unresolved variables in collapsed mode.
⏺ Let me analyze each failing test:
Failing Tests Analysis
1. autodup_bound_vars
expected: [[[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λa.[20,a]]],...
detected: [[[10,λa.[20,a]],[10,λb.[20,a]],[10,λc.[20,a]]],...
Analysis: In the expected output, all three lambdas are named λa (de Bruijn style - same depth = same name). In my output,
they get unique names λa, λb, λc (location-based). More critically, the body variables are all a instead of matching their
respective lambdas.
Verdict: Printing difference - but my quoted-mode printer is broken. In collapse mode (quoted=1), the old printer used
depth+1 from the recursive call for naming, and NAMs used term_ext(). My new printer uses location-based naming in both
modes, which doesn't match the NAM encoding.
2. autodup_nightmare
Same root cause as above - location-based naming in quoted mode doesn't match the de Bruijn indices stored in NAMs.
Verdict: Printing difference - same fix needed.
3. collapse_supgen_mul
expected: λa.λb.λ{0n:λc.0n;1n+:λc.λd.a(d,b(c,d))}
detected: λa.λb.λ{0n:λc.0n;1n+:λd.λe.a(d,b(c,d))}
The inner lambdas get different names because of location-based naming instead of depth-based.
Verdict: Printing difference - same root cause.
4. unscoped_nested
expected: λa.λb._
detected: λa.λb.c
Analysis: In the old code, unresolved VARs printed as _. My new code assigns them a location-based name. In quoted/collapse
mode, after SNF, any remaining VAR is an unscoped/escaped variable that should print as _.
Verdict: Printing difference - in quoted mode, unresolved VARs should print as _.
5. unscoped_var
expected: λa._
detected: λa.b
Same issue as unscoped_nested.
Verdict: Printing difference - same fix needed.
---
Root Cause Summary
All 5 failures are printing differences, not actual computation errors. The issue is that my print_term_quoted() function
uses the new location-based naming system, but for collapse mode it should use de Bruijn-style naming (like the old printer)
because:
1. LAM terms in quoted mode have ext = depth+1 set by snf_quoted()
2. NAM terms (substituted variables) have ext = depth encoding the de Bruijn index
3. Unresolved VARs (escaped/unscoped) should print as _, not with a name
The fix is to make the quoted-mode printer:
- Use term_ext(LAM) for lambda naming (de Bruijn depth)
- Use term_ext(NAM) for NAM naming (same depth) with print_name()
- Print unresolved VAR as _ and CO0/CO1 as _₀/_₁
This preserves the old collapse behavior while keeping the new location-based naming for non-quoted mode (the //! tests).
> fix any errors in your code. ultrathink
∴ Thinking…
I need to fix the quoted mode printer to use de Bruijn-style naming instead of location-based naming. Let me trace through
what needs to change:
1. In quoted mode (collapse):
- LAM: use term_ext(term) for the name (de Bruijn depth), use print_name()
- NAM: use term_ext(term) for the name, use print_name()
- VAR: print as _ (unresolved)
- CO0/CO1: print as _₀/_₁ (unresolved)
- Need to track depth for recursive calls
2. In non-quoted mode (normal run):
- LAM: use print_lam_name(loc) for location-based naming, use print_lam_var_name()
- VAR: use print_lam_name(loc) for the same name as binding lambda
- CO0/CO1: use print_dup_name(loc) with subscripts
- NAM: shouldn't appear (but if it does, use print_name())
The key insight is that in quoted mode, the printer should behave like the old printer - using depth-based naming. In
non-quoted mode, it uses the new location-based naming.
Let me rewrite print_term_go to handle both modes properly. I need to add a depth parameter that's used in quoted mode.
Actually, looking at my code structure, I have:
- print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) - the main recursive function
- print_term_full(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) - initializes state and calls print_term_go
For quoted mode, I need to track depth. Let me add a depth parameter to print_term_go.
Wait, but that changes the signature and I have many recursive calls.
I'll explore different strategies for managing depth tracking. The goal is to minimize code changes while supporting de
Bruijn-style naming in quoted mode. Each approach has trade-offs in complexity and maintainability. I'll carefully evaluate
how to modify the printing mechanism to support depth-based naming without disrupting the existing code structure.
The key modifications involve updating print_term_go to handle depth tracking, with specific adjustments for different term
types like LAM, DUP, VAR, and constructors. I'll need to modify recursive calls and naming conventions to consistently apply
depth-based indexing.
Critically, I'll need to update print_app to handle the new depth parameter, ensuring consistent propagation through
recursive term traversal. This requires a systematic approach to parameter passing and depth management across multiple
function calls.
The floating dups printing presents an interesting depth consideration. Using depth=0 seems most appropriate, treating these
as top-level terms during output generation.
I'll carefully review each call site to ensure depth is correctly threaded through the printing infrastructure, maintaining
both quoted and non-quoted mode behaviors while introducing this new depth tracking mechanism.
The _alo_book_go function's existing non-quoted print approach remains unchanged, which simplifies the implementation
strategy.
⏺ I need to fix the quoted mode printer to use de Bruijn-style naming (like the old printer) instead of location-based naming.
Let me update print/term.c.
⏺ Read(clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Read 624 lines
∴ Thinking…
Now I need to rewrite this to handle quoted mode properly. The key changes:
1. Add a depth parameter to print_term_go for tracking de Bruijn depth in quoted mode
2. In quoted mode:
- LAM: use term_ext(term) (which is depth+1 from snf_quoted) for the name, print with print_name()
- NAM: use term_ext(term) for the name, print with print_name()
- VAR: print _ (unresolved)
- CO0/CO1: print _₀/_₁ (unresolved)
- DUP: use depth+1 for the name
3. In non-quoted mode: keep the current location-based naming
Let me rewrite the file with these changes.
⏺ Now I need to rewrite the printer to properly handle quoted mode with de Bruijn naming. The key insight is:
- Quoted mode (collapse): Use depth-based naming like the old printer, VARs print as _
- Non-quoted mode (normal): Use location-based naming, VARs print with their binding lambda's name
⏺ Write(/Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang/print/term.c)
⎿ Added 91 lines, removed 63 lines
42 }
43 }
44
45 - fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted);
45 + fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted, u32 depth);
46 fn void print_alo_book_go(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc, u32 depth);
47 - fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted);
47 + fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted, u32 depth);
48
49 fn void print_mat_name(FILE *f, u32 nam) {
50 if (nam == NAM_ZER) fputs("0n", f);
...
79 }
80
81 // Prints APP and DRY chains as f(x,y,z)
82 - fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) {
82 + fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted, u32 depth) {
83 Term spine[256];
84 u32 len = 0;
85 Term curr = term;
...
90 }
91 if (term_tag(curr) == LAM) {
92 fputc('(', f);
93 - print_term_go(f, curr, quoted);
93 + print_term_go(f, curr, quoted, depth);
94 fputc(')', f);
95 } else {
96 - print_term_go(f, curr, quoted);
96 + print_term_go(f, curr, quoted, depth);
97 }
98 fputc('(', f);
99 for (u32 i = 0; i < len; i++) {
100 if (i > 0) {
101 fputc(',', f);
102 }
103 - print_term_go(f, spine[len - 1 - i], quoted);
103 + print_term_go(f, spine[len - 1 - i], quoted, depth);
104 }
105 fputc(')', f);
106 }
...
121 }
122 }
123
124 - fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) {
124 + fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted, u32 depth) {
125 // Assert: term should never have SUB bit set
126 if (term_sub(term)) {
127 fprintf(stderr, "PRINT_ERROR: term has SUB bit set\n");
...
133
134 switch (term_tag(term)) {
135 case NAM: {
136 + // NAM uses nick alphabet (same in both modes)
137 print_name(f, term_ext(term));
138 break;
139 }
140 case DRY: {
141 - print_app(f, term, quoted);
141 + print_app(f, term, quoted, depth);
142 break;
143 }
144 case VAR: {
145 - u32 loc = term_val(term);
146 - u32 nam = print_lam_name(loc);
147 - print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
145 + if (quoted) {
146 + // Quoted mode: unresolved VAR prints as _
147 + fputs("_", f);
148 + } else {
149 + // Non-quoted mode: use location-based name
150 + u32 loc = term_val(term);
151 + u32 nam = print_lam_name(loc);
152 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
153 + }
154 break;
155 }
156 case NUM: {
...
170 }
171 case CO0:
172 case CO1: {
173 - u32 loc = term_val(term);
174 - u32 lab = term_ext(term);
175 - u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
176 - print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
177 - print_dup_discover(loc, lab);
178 - fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
173 + if (quoted) {
174 + // Quoted mode: unresolved CO0/CO1 prints as _₀/_₁
175 + fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "_₀" : "_₁", f);
176 + } else {
177 + // Non-quoted mode: use location-based name
178 + u32 loc = term_val(term);
179 + u32 lab = term_ext(term);
180 + u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
181 + print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
182 + print_dup_discover(loc, lab);
183 + fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
184 + }
185 break;
186 }
187 case LAM: {
188 u32 loc = term_val(term);
189 - u32 nam = print_lam_name(loc);
189 fputs("λ", f);
190 - print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
191 - fputc('.', f);
192 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted);
190 + if (quoted) {
191 + // Quoted mode: use depth from ext field (set by snf_quoted)
192 + u32 nam = term_ext(term);
193 + print_name(f, nam);
194 + fputc('.', f);
195 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, nam);
196 + } else {
197 + // Non-quoted mode: use location-based name
198 + u32 nam = print_lam_name(loc);
199 + print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
200 + fputc('.', f);
201 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, depth + 1);
202 + }
203 break;
204 }
205 case APP: {
206 - print_app(f, term, quoted);
206 + print_app(f, term, quoted, depth);
207 break;
208 }
209 case SUP: {
...
196 fputc('&', f);
197 print_name(f, term_ext(term));
198 fputc('{', f);
199 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
199 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
200 fputc(',', f);
201 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
201 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
202 fputc('}', f);
203 break;
204 }
205 case DUP: {
206 u32 loc = term_val(term);
207 - u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
207 fputc('!', f);
208 - print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
208 + if (quoted) {
209 + // Quoted mode: use depth+1 for name
210 + print_name(f, depth + 1);
211 + } else {
212 + // Non-quoted mode: use location-based name
213 + u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
214 + print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
215 + }
216 fputc('&', f);
217 print_name(f, term_ext(term));
218 fputc('=', f);
219 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
219 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
220 fputc(';', f);
221 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
221 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth + 1);
222 break;
223 }
224 case MAT:
...
224 if (term_tag(cur) == SWI) fprintf(f, "%u", term_ext(cur));
225 else print_mat_name(f, term_ext(cur));
226 fputc(':', f);
227 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
227 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
228 Term next = HEAP[loc + 1];
229 if (term_tag(next) == MAT || term_tag(next) == SWI) fputc(';', f);
230 cur = next;
...
233 // empty default
234 } else if (term_tag(cur) == USE) {
235 fputc(';', f);
236 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(cur)], quoted);
236 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(cur)], quoted, depth);
237 } else {
238 fputc(';', f);
239 - print_term_go(f, cur, quoted);
239 + print_term_go(f, cur, quoted, depth);
240 }
241 fputc('}', f);
242 break;
...
244 case USE: {
245 u32 loc = term_val(term);
246 fputs("λ{", f);
247 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted);
247 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, depth);
248 fputc('}', f);
249 break;
250 }
251 case C00 ... C16: {
252 - print_ctr(f, term, quoted);
252 + print_ctr(f, term, quoted, depth);
253 break;
254 }
255 case OP2: {
...
260 "~", "==", "!=", "<", "<=", ">", ">="
261 };
262 fputc('(', f);
263 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
263 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
264 fputc(' ', f);
265 if (opr < 17) fputs(op_syms[opr], f);
266 else fprintf(f, "?%u", opr);
267 fputc(' ', f);
268 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
268 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
269 fputc(')', f);
270 break;
271 }
272 case DSU: {
273 u32 loc = term_val(term);
274 fputs("&(", f);
275 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
275 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
276 fputs("){", f);
277 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
277 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
278 fputc(',', f);
279 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], quoted);
279 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], quoted, depth);
280 fputc('}', f);
281 break;
282 }
283 case DDU: {
284 u32 loc = term_val(term);
285 fputs("!(", f);
286 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
286 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
287 fputs(")=", f);
288 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
288 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
289 fputc(';', f);
290 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], quoted);
290 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], quoted, depth);
291 break;
292 }
293 case ALO: {
...
307 }
308 case RED: {
309 u32 loc = term_val(term);
310 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
310 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
311 fputs(" ~> ", f);
312 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
312 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
313 break;
314 }
315 case EQL: {
316 u32 loc = term_val(term);
317 fputc('(', f);
318 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
318 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
319 fputs(" === ", f);
320 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
320 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
321 fputc(')', f);
322 break;
323 }
324 case AND: {
325 u32 loc = term_val(term);
326 fputc('(', f);
327 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
327 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
328 fputs(" .&. ", f);
329 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
329 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
330 fputc(')', f);
331 break;
332 }
333 case OR: {
334 u32 loc = term_val(term);
335 fputc('(', f);
336 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted);
336 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
337 fputs(" .|. ", f);
338 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted);
338 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
339 fputc(')', f);
340 break;
341 }
...
353 fputs(" = λ ", f);
354 print_lam_var_name(f, nam_v);
355 fputs(" ; ", f);
356 - print_term_go(f, body, quoted);
356 + print_term_go(f, body, quoted, depth);
357 break;
358 }
359 case INC: {
360 u32 loc = term_val(term);
361 fputs("↑", f);
362 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted);
362 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, depth);
363 break;
364 }
365 }
...
387 if (ls != 0) {
388 u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
389 if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
390 - print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0);
390 + print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0, 0);
391 } else {
392 u32 nam = print_lam_name(bind_loc);
393 print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
...
417 if (ls != 0) {
418 u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
419 if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
420 - print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0);
420 + print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0, 0);
421 } else {
422 u32 nam = print_dup_name(bind_loc);
423 print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
...
517 break;
518 }
519 default: {
520 - print_term_go(f, book, 0);
520 + print_term_go(f, book, 0, 0);
521 break;
522 }
523 }
524 }
525
526 - fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted) {
526 + fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted, u32 depth) {
527 u32 nam = term_ext(t), loc = term_val(t), ari = term_tag(t) - C00;
528 // Nat: count SUCs, print as Nn or Nn+x
529 if (nam == NAM_ZER || nam == NAM_SUC) {
530 u32 n = 0;
531 while (term_tag(t) == C01 && term_ext(t) == NAM_SUC) { n++; t = HEAP[term_val(t)]; }
532 fprintf(f, "%un", n);
533 - if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) { fputc('+', f); print_term_go(f, t, quoted); }
533 + if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) { fputc('+', f); print_term_go(f, t, quoted
+ , depth); }
534 return;
535 }
536 // Char: 'x' or 'λ'
...
569 fputc('[', f);
570 for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02; x = HEAP[term_val(x)+1]) {
571 if (x != t) fputc(',', f);
572 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(x)], quoted);
572 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(x)], quoted, depth);
573 }
574 fputc(']', f);
575 return;
576 }
577 // Improper list: h<>t
578 if (nam == NAM_CON) {
579 - print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted); fputs("<>", f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+1], quoted);
579 + print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, depth); fputs("<>", f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+1], quoted
+ , depth);
580 return;
581 }
582 }
583 // Default CTR
584 fputc('#', f); print_name(f, nam); fputc('{', f);
585 - for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) { if (i) fputc(',', f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+i], quoted); }
585 + for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) { if (i) fputc(',', f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+i], quoted, depth); }
586 fputc('}', f);
587 }
588
589 // Print floating dups discovered during printing
590 - fn void print_floating_dups(FILE *f, u8 quoted) {
590 + fn void print_floating_dups(FILE *f, u8 quoted, u32 depth) {
591 while (P.dup_head < P.dup_tail) {
592 u32 loc = P.dup_queue[P.dup_head++];
593 Term val = HEAP[loc];
...
603 fputc('&', f);
604 print_name(f, lab);
605 fputc('=', f);
606 - print_term_go(f, val, quoted);
606 + print_term_go(f, val, quoted, depth);
607 fputc(';', f);
608 }
609 }
610
611 fn void print_term_full(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) {
612 print_state_init();
613 - print_term_go(f, term, quoted);
614 - print_floating_dups(f, quoted);
613 + print_term_go(f, term, quoted, 0);
614 + print_floating_dups(f, quoted, 0);
615 }
616
617 fn void print_term(Term term) {
∴ Thinking…
Good, I updated the code. Now let me compile and run the tests to see if they pass.
⏺ Now let me compile and run all the tests.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude/clang && clang -O2 -o main main.c 2>&1)
⎿ (No content)
∴ Thinking…
Compilation succeeded. Now let me run all tests.
⏺ Bash(./test/_all_.sh 2>&1)
⎿ Error: Exit code 127
(eval):1: no such file or directory: ./test/_all_.sh
∴ Thinking…
I need to be in the right directory.
⏺ Bash(cd /Users/v/vic/dev/hvm4-claude && ./test/_all_.sh 2>&1)
⎿ === Testing C ===
[PASS] autodup_1
[PASS] autodup_2
[PASS] autodup_3
[PASS] autodup_4
[PASS] autodup_bound_vars
[PASS] autodup_deep
[PASS] autodup_dup_dyn_3each
[PASS] autodup_dup_dyn_both
[PASS] autodup_dup_dyn
[PASS] autodup_dup_static_3each
[PASS] autodup_dup_static_both
[PASS] autodup_dup_static
[PASS] autodup_let
[PASS] autodup_many
[PASS] autodup_mat_lam
[PASS] autodup_mixed
[PASS] autodup_nested_lam
[PASS] autodup_nightmare
[PASS] autodup_outer_ref
[PASS] autodup_strict
[PASS] autodup_sup_mix
[PASS] autodup_value_path
[PASS] c2_not_t
[PASS] c8_k8_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c1_c1_not
[PASS] cadd_c1_c4_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c1_c4
[PASS] cadd_c2_c1
[PASS] cadd_c2_c2
[PASS] cadd_c2_c4_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c4_c1_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c4_c1
[PASS] cadd_c4_c2_not_t
[PASS] cadd_c4_c4
[PASS] cmul_c4_c2_not_t
[PASS] cmul_c4_c2
[PASS] cmul_c4_c4_not_t
[PASS] cmul_c4_c4
[PASS] cnot_not
[PASS] cnot_true
[PASS] collapse_0
[PASS] collapse_1
[PASS] collapse_2
[PASS] collapse_3
[PASS] collapse_4
[PASS] collapse_5
[PASS] collapse_6
[PASS] collapse_7
[PASS] collapse_8
[PASS] collapse_9
[PASS] collapse_era_ctr
[PASS] collapse_era_deep
[PASS] collapse_era_multi_ctr
[PASS] collapse_era_nested
[PASS] collapse_era_pair
[PASS] collapse_era
[PASS] collapse_supgen_mul
[PASS] dup_affine_bare
[PASS] dup_affine_cloned
[PASS] dup_affine_co0
[PASS] dup_affine_co1
[PASS] dup_affine_shadow_ok
[PASS] dup_affine_valid
[PASS] dup_fresh
[PASS] dyn_dup_nested
[PASS] dyn_dup_sup
[PASS] enum_bits
[PASS] enum_nat
[PASS] eql_app_fun
[PASS] eql_ctr_empty
[PASS] eql_ctr_f1
[PASS] eql_ctr_f2
[PASS] eql_ctr_t
[PASS] eql_dup
[PASS] eql_lam_f
[PASS] eql_lam_nested_f
[PASS] eql_lam_nested
[PASS] eql_lam_t
[PASS] eql_list_f
[PASS] eql_list_t
[PASS] eql_mixed_f
[PASS] eql_nat_f
[PASS] eql_nat_t
[PASS] eql_nested
[PASS] eql_num_f
[PASS] eql_num_t
[PASS] eql_ref
[PASS] eql_str_f
[PASS] eql_str_t
[PASS] eql_sup
[PASS] factorial
[PASS] fibo
[PASS] fork_dynamic
[PASS] fork_static
[PASS] fuse_inc
[PASS] lam_dup_auto
[PASS] lam_dup_dyn
[PASS] lam_dup_static
[PASS] lam_dup_sup
[PASS] lambda_eval
[PASS] let
[PASS] long_name_def
[PASS] long_name_no_collision
[PASS] long_name_undef
[PASS] map
[PASS] match_0
[PASS] match_1
[PASS] match_2
[PASS] match_3
[PASS] match_4
[PASS] match_5
[PASS] mul2_4
[PASS] multiarg_cloned
[PASS] multiarg_inline_dup
[PASS] multiarg_mixed
[PASS] multiarg_simple
[PASS] pair_swap
[PASS] parser
[PASS] prim_add
[PASS] prim_and
[PASS] prim_div
[PASS] prim_dup
[PASS] prim_eq_f
[PASS] prim_eq_t
[PASS] prim_ge_f
[PASS] prim_ge_t
[PASS] prim_gt_f
[PASS] prim_gt_t
[PASS] prim_le_f
[PASS] prim_le_t
[PASS] prim_lsh
[PASS] prim_lt_f
[PASS] prim_lt_t
[PASS] prim_mod
[PASS] prim_mul
[PASS] prim_ne_f
[PASS] prim_ne_t
[PASS] prim_not
[PASS] prim_or
[PASS] prim_rsh
[PASS] prim_sp0
[PASS] prim_sp1
[PASS] prim_sub
[PASS] prim_sup
[PASS] prim_xor
[PASS] print_mat_default
[PASS] print_mat_lst
[PASS] print_mat_nat
[PASS] print_mat
[PASS] print_swi
[PASS] red_add_stuck_a
[PASS] red_add_stuck_b
[PASS] red_and_ff
[PASS] red_and_stuck_a
[PASS] red_and_stuck_b
[PASS] red_and_tf
[PASS] red_and_tt
[PASS] red_dbl_stuck
[PASS] red_dbl
[PASS] red_dup
[PASS] red_foo
[PASS] red_foo2
[PASS] red_id
[PASS] red_not
[PASS] red_not2
[PASS] red_prd_direct
[PASS] red_prd
[PASS] red_simple
[PASS] red_sum_stuck
[PASS] red_sum
[PASS] regression_autodup_3uses_recursive
[PASS] scoped_var_both
[PASS] scoped_var
[PASS] snf_c2_k2
[PASS] snf_unscoped
[PASS] sugar_chr
[PASS] sugar_cons
[PASS] sugar_lst
[PASS] sugar_mat_lst
[PASS] sugar_mat_nat
[PASS] sugar_nat_plus
[PASS] sugar_nat
[PASS] sugar_nil
[PASS] sugar_str
[PASS] sum_4
[PASS] unicode_char
[PASS] unicode_cjk
[PASS] unicode_emoji
[PASS] unicode_greek
[PASS] unicode_mixed
[PASS] unicode_string
[PASS] unscoped_callcc
[PASS] unscoped_mut_ref
[PASS] unscoped_nested
[PASS] unscoped_queue
[PASS] unscoped_var
[PASS] unscoped
All tests passed!
∴ Thinking…
All 165 tests passed! The fix was to properly separate the two printing modes:
1. Quoted mode (collapse/flatten): Uses de Bruijn-style naming where:
- LAM uses term_ext(term) (set by snf_quoted) for the name, printed with print_name()
- NAM uses term_ext(term) for the name, printed with print_name()
- Unresolved VAR prints as _
- Unresolved CO0/CO1 prints as _₀/_₁
2. Non-quoted mode (normal run): Uses location-based naming where:
- LAM uses print_lam_name(loc) for globally unique names, printed with print_lam_var_name()
- VAR uses print_lam_name(loc) matching its binding lambda
- CO0/CO1 uses print_dup_name(loc) with uppercase names and subscripts
- Floating dups are discovered and printed after the main term
This preserves backward compatibility with the existing collapse tests while enabling the new non-quoted mode for the //!
tests.
⏺ All 165 tests passed. The fix properly separates the two printing modes:
1. Quoted mode (for collapse): Uses de Bruijn-style naming matching the old printer behavior:
- LAM uses term_ext() (depth set by snf_quoted) with print_name()
- NAM uses term_ext() with print_name()
- Unresolved VAR prints as _
- Unresolved CO0/CO1 prints as _₀/_₁
2. Non-quoted mode (for normal //! tests): Uses the new location-based naming:
- LAM uses print_lam_name(loc) with lowercase a, b, c, ...
- VAR uses print_lam_name(loc) matching its binding lambda
- CO0/CO1 uses print_dup_name(loc) with uppercase A, B, C, ... and subscripts
- Floating dups are discovered and printed after the main term
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> commit these changes ↵ send
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-- INSERT -- ⏵⏵ bypass permissions on (shift+tab to cycle) 180876 tokens
Context low (0% remaining) · Run /compact to compact & continue
diff --git a/clang/collapse/flatten.c b/clang/collapse/flatten.c
index 0692a88..ae514f9 100644
--- a/clang/collapse/flatten.c
+++ b/clang/collapse/flatten.c
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ fn void collapse_flatten(Term term, int limit, int show_itrs) {
collapse_queue_push(&pq, (CollapseQueueItem){.pri = (u8)(pri + 1), .loc = sup_loc + 0});
collapse_queue_push(&pq, (CollapseQueueItem){.pri = (u8)(pri + 1), .loc = sup_loc + 1});
} else if (term_tag(t) != ERA) {
- // Non-SUP, non-ERA result - normalize and print
- t = snf(t, 0);
- print_term(t);
+ // Non-SUP, non-ERA result - normalize and print (quoted mode)
+ t = snf_quoted(t, 0);
+ print_term_quoted(t);
if (show_itrs) {
printf(" \033[2m#%llu\033[0m", ITRS);
}
diff --git a/clang/print/term.c b/clang/print/term.c
index 6626ec0..68d8826 100644
--- a/clang/print/term.c
+++ b/clang/print/term.c
@@ -1,6 +1,50 @@
-fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth);
+// Print State (global naming and floating dup tracking)
+// ======================================================
-fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d);
+typedef struct {
+ u32 lam_names[65536]; // loc -> unique name (lowercase: a, b, c, ...)
+ u32 dup_names[65536]; // loc -> unique name (uppercase: A, B, C, ...)
+ u32 dup_labs[65536]; // loc -> dup label
+ u32 dup_queue[4096]; // discovered floating dups to print
+ u8 dup_seen[65536]; // bitmap: have we seen this dup?
+ u32 lam_count;
+ u32 dup_count;
+ u32 dup_head;
+ u32 dup_tail;
+} PrintState;
+
+static PrintState P;
+
+fn void print_state_init() {
+ memset(&P, 0, sizeof(P));
+}
+
+fn u32 print_lam_name(u32 loc) {
+ if (P.lam_names[loc & 0xFFFF] == 0) {
+ P.lam_names[loc & 0xFFFF] = ++P.lam_count;
+ }
+ return P.lam_names[loc & 0xFFFF];
+}
+
+fn u32 print_dup_name(u32 loc) {
+ if (P.dup_names[loc & 0xFFFF] == 0) {
+ P.dup_names[loc & 0xFFFF] = ++P.dup_count;
+ }
+ return P.dup_names[loc & 0xFFFF];
+}
+
+fn void print_dup_discover(u32 loc, u32 lab) {
+ u32 idx = loc & 0xFFFF;
+ if (!P.dup_seen[idx]) {
+ P.dup_seen[idx] = 1;
+ P.dup_labs[idx] = lab;
+ P.dup_queue[P.dup_tail++] = loc;
+ }
+}
+
+fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted, u32 depth);
+fn void print_alo_book_go(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc, u32 depth);
+fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted, u32 depth);
fn void print_mat_name(FILE *f, u32 nam) {
if (nam == NAM_ZER) fputs("0n", f);
@@ -10,8 +54,32 @@ fn void print_mat_name(FILE *f, u32 nam) {
else { fputc('#', f); print_name(f, nam); }
}
+// Print lowercase name for lambda vars (a, b, c, ... aa, ab, ...)
+fn void print_lam_var_name(FILE *f, u32 n) {
+ if (n == 0) n = 1;
+ n--;
+ if (n < 26) {
+ fputc('a' + n, f);
+ } else {
+ print_lam_var_name(f, n / 26);
+ fputc('a' + (n % 26), f);
+ }
+}
+
+// Print uppercase name for dup vars (A, B, C, ... AA, AB, ...)
+fn void print_dup_var_name(FILE *f, u32 n) {
+ if (n == 0) n = 1;
+ n--;
+ if (n < 26) {
+ fputc('A' + n, f);
+ } else {
+ print_dup_var_name(f, n / 26);
+ fputc('A' + (n % 26), f);
+ }
+}
+
// Prints APP and DRY chains as f(x,y,z)
-fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
+fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted, u32 depth) {
Term spine[256];
u32 len = 0;
Term curr = term;
@@ -22,36 +90,67 @@ fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
}
if (term_tag(curr) == LAM) {
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, curr, depth);
+ print_term_go(f, curr, quoted, depth);
fputc(')', f);
} else {
- print_term_go(f, curr, depth);
+ print_term_go(f, curr, quoted, depth);
}
fputc('(', f);
for (u32 i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (i > 0) {
fputc(',', f);
}
- print_term_go(f, spine[len - 1 - i], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, spine[len - 1 - i], quoted, depth);
}
fputc(')', f);
}
-fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
+// Chase substitutions: if a VAR/CO0/CO1 points to a marked (substituted) slot,
+// return the unmarked substitution term; otherwise return the original term
+fn Term print_chase(Term term) {
+ while (1) {
+ u8 tag = term_tag(term);
+ if (tag == VAR || tag == CO0 || tag == CO1) {
+ u32 loc = term_val(term);
+ if (term_sub(HEAP[loc])) {
+ term = term_unmark(HEAP[loc]);
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+ return term;
+ }
+}
+
+fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted, u32 depth) {
+ // Assert: term should never have SUB bit set
+ if (term_sub(term)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "PRINT_ERROR: term has SUB bit set\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ // Chase substitutions for variables
+ term = print_chase(term);
+
switch (term_tag(term)) {
case NAM: {
- // Print stuck variable as just the name
+ // NAM uses nick alphabet (same in both modes)
print_name(f, term_ext(term));
break;
}
case DRY: {
- // Print stuck application as f(x,y)
- print_app(f, term, depth);
+ print_app(f, term, quoted, depth);
break;
}
case VAR: {
- // Unresolved variable (should have been substituted to NAM by snf)
- fputs("_", f);
+ if (quoted) {
+ // Quoted mode: unresolved VAR prints as _
+ fputs("_", f);
+ } else {
+ // Non-quoted mode: use location-based name
+ u32 loc = term_val(term);
+ u32 nam = print_lam_name(loc);
+ print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
+ }
break;
}
case NUM: {
@@ -78,21 +177,40 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
}
case CO0:
case CO1: {
- // Unresolved copy reference (unscoped variable)
- fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "_₀" : "_₁", f);
+ if (quoted) {
+ // Quoted mode: unresolved CO0/CO1 prints as _₀/_₁
+ fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "_₀" : "_₁", f);
+ } else {
+ // Non-quoted mode: use location-based name
+ u32 loc = term_val(term);
+ u32 lab = term_ext(term);
+ u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
+ print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
+ print_dup_discover(loc, lab);
+ fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
+ }
break;
}
case LAM: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
- u32 nam = depth + 1;
fputs("λ", f);
- print_name(f, nam);
- fputc('.', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth + 1);
+ if (quoted) {
+ // Quoted mode: use depth from ext field (set by snf_quoted)
+ u32 nam = term_ext(term);
+ print_name(f, nam);
+ fputc('.', f);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, nam);
+ } else {
+ // Non-quoted mode: use location-based name
+ u32 nam = print_lam_name(loc);
+ print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
+ fputc('.', f);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, depth + 1);
+ }
break;
}
case APP: {
- print_app(f, term, depth);
+ print_app(f, term, quoted, depth);
break;
}
case SUP: {
@@ -100,23 +218,29 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
fputc('&', f);
print_name(f, term_ext(term));
fputc('{', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputc(',', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
fputc('}', f);
break;
}
case DUP: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
- u32 nam = depth + 1;
fputc('!', f);
- print_name(f, nam);
+ if (quoted) {
+ // Quoted mode: use depth+1 for name
+ print_name(f, depth + 1);
+ } else {
+ // Non-quoted mode: use location-based name
+ u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
+ print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
+ }
fputc('&', f);
print_name(f, term_ext(term));
fputc('=', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputc(';', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth + 1);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth + 1);
break;
}
case MAT:
@@ -128,20 +252,19 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
if (term_tag(cur) == SWI) fprintf(f, "%u", term_ext(cur));
else print_mat_name(f, term_ext(cur));
fputc(':', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
Term next = HEAP[loc + 1];
if (term_tag(next) == MAT || term_tag(next) == SWI) fputc(';', f);
cur = next;
}
- // Handle tail: NUM(0) = empty, USE = wrapped default, other = default
if (term_tag(cur) == NUM && term_val(cur) == 0) {
- // empty default - just close
+ // empty default
} else if (term_tag(cur) == USE) {
fputc(';', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(cur)], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(cur)], quoted, depth);
} else {
fputc(';', f);
- print_term_go(f, cur, depth);
+ print_term_go(f, cur, quoted, depth);
}
fputc('}', f);
break;
@@ -149,12 +272,12 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
case USE: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputs("λ{", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, depth);
fputc('}', f);
break;
}
case C00 ... C16: {
- print_ctr(f, term, depth);
+ print_ctr(f, term, quoted, depth);
break;
}
case OP2: {
@@ -165,107 +288,277 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
"~", "==", "!=", "<", "<=", ">", ">="
};
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputc(' ', f);
if (opr < 17) fputs(op_syms[opr], f);
else fprintf(f, "?%u", opr);
fputc(' ', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
fputc(')', f);
break;
}
case DSU: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputs("&(", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputs("){", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
fputc(',', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], quoted, depth);
fputc('}', f);
break;
}
case DDU: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputs("!(", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputs(")=", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
fputc(';', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], quoted, depth);
break;
}
case ALO: {
- fputs("<ALO>", f);
+ if (quoted) {
+ fputs("<ALO>", f);
+ } else {
+ // Print as @{book_term} with substitutions applied
+ u32 alo_loc = term_val(term);
+ u64 pair = HEAP[alo_loc];
+ u32 tm_loc = (u32)(pair & 0xFFFFFFFF);
+ u32 ls_loc = (u32)(pair >> 32);
+ fputs("@{", f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, tm_loc, ls_loc, 0);
+ fputc('}', f);
+ }
break;
}
case RED: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputs(" ~> ", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
break;
}
case EQL: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputs(" === ", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
fputc(')', f);
break;
}
case AND: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputs(" .&. ", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
fputc(')', f);
break;
}
case OR: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], quoted, depth);
fputs(" .|. ", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], quoted, depth);
fputc(')', f);
break;
}
case UNS: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
- // UNS body is λf.λv.actual_body - extract names from depths
Term lam_f = HEAP[loc];
- u32 nam_f = depth + 1;
- Term lam_v = HEAP[term_val(lam_f)];
- u32 nam_v = depth + 2;
- Term body = HEAP[term_val(lam_v)];
+ u32 lam_f_loc = term_val(lam_f);
+ u32 nam_f = print_lam_name(lam_f_loc);
+ Term lam_v = HEAP[lam_f_loc];
+ u32 lam_v_loc = term_val(lam_v);
+ u32 nam_v = print_lam_name(lam_v_loc);
+ Term body = HEAP[lam_v_loc];
fputs("! ", f);
- print_name(f, nam_f);
+ print_lam_var_name(f, nam_f);
fputs(" = λ ", f);
- print_name(f, nam_v);
+ print_lam_var_name(f, nam_v);
fputs(" ; ", f);
- print_term_go(f, body, depth + 2);
+ print_term_go(f, body, quoted, depth);
break;
}
case INC: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputs("↑", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, depth);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Print ALO book term with substitutions from bind list
+// depth tracks how many binders (LAM/DUP) we've entered in the book term
+fn void print_alo_book_go(FILE *f, u32 tm_loc, u32 ls_loc, u32 depth) {
+ Term book = HEAP[tm_loc];
+
+ switch (term_tag(book)) {
+ case VAR: {
+ u32 idx = term_val(book);
+ if (idx < depth) {
+ // Refers to a binder inside the book term (quoted)
+ // Use the lambda name counter from depth-idx positions ago
+ print_lam_var_name(f, P.lam_count - idx);
+ } else {
+ // Refers to the bind list
+ u32 adj_idx = idx - depth;
+ u32 ls = ls_loc;
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < adj_idx && ls != 0; i++) {
+ ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
+ }
+ if (ls != 0) {
+ u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
+ if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
+ print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0, 0);
+ } else {
+ u32 nam = print_lam_name(bind_loc);
+ print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
+ }
+ } else {
+ fprintf(f, "$%u", idx);
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ case CO0:
+ case CO1: {
+ u32 idx = term_val(book);
+ u32 lab = term_ext(book);
+ if (idx < depth) {
+ // Refers to a binder inside the book term (quoted)
+ // Use the dup name counter from depth-idx positions ago
+ print_dup_var_name(f, P.dup_count - idx);
+ fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
+ } else {
+ // Refers to the bind list
+ u32 adj_idx = idx - depth;
+ u32 ls = ls_loc;
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < adj_idx && ls != 0; i++) {
+ ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
+ }
+ if (ls != 0) {
+ u32 bind_loc = (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32);
+ if (term_sub(HEAP[bind_loc])) {
+ print_term_go(f, term_unmark(HEAP[bind_loc]), 0, 0);
+ } else {
+ u32 nam = print_dup_name(bind_loc);
+ print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
+ print_dup_discover(bind_loc, lab);
+ fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
+ }
+ } else {
+ fprintf(f, "$%u", idx);
+ fputs(term_tag(book) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ case LAM: {
+ u32 body_loc = term_val(book);
+ fputs("λ", f);
+ u32 nam = ++P.lam_count;
+ print_lam_var_name(f, nam);
+ fputc('.', f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, body_loc, ls_loc, depth + 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ case DUP: {
+ u32 expr_loc = term_val(book);
+ u32 lab = term_ext(book);
+ fputs("!", f);
+ u32 nam = ++P.dup_count;
+ print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
+ fputc('&', f);
+ print_name(f, lab);
+ fputc('=', f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, expr_loc + 0, ls_loc, depth);
+ fputc(';', f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, expr_loc + 1, ls_loc, depth + 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ case APP: {
+ u32 loc = term_val(book);
+ Term fun = HEAP[loc];
+ if (term_tag(fun) == APP || term_tag(fun) == LAM) {
+ fputc('(', f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, loc, ls_loc, depth);
+ fputc(')', f);
+ } else {
+ print_alo_book_go(f, loc, ls_loc, depth);
+ }
+ fputc('(', f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, loc + 1, ls_loc, depth);
+ fputc(')', f);
+ break;
+ }
+ case SUP: {
+ u32 loc = term_val(book);
+ fputc('&', f);
+ print_name(f, term_ext(book));
+ fputc('{', f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, loc + 0, ls_loc, depth);
+ fputc(',', f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, loc + 1, ls_loc, depth);
+ fputc('}', f);
+ break;
+ }
+ case NUM: {
+ fprintf(f, "%u", term_val(book));
+ break;
+ }
+ case REF: {
+ fputc('@', f);
+ char *name = table_get(term_ext(book));
+ if (name != NULL) {
+ fputs(name, f);
+ } else {
+ print_name(f, term_ext(book));
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ case ERA: {
+ fputs("&{}", f);
+ break;
+ }
+ case NAM: {
+ print_name(f, term_ext(book));
+ break;
+ }
+ case C00 ... C16: {
+ u32 nam = term_ext(book);
+ u32 loc = term_val(book);
+ u32 ari = term_tag(book) - C00;
+ fputc('#', f);
+ print_name(f, nam);
+ fputc('{', f);
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) {
+ if (i) fputc(',', f);
+ print_alo_book_go(f, loc + i, ls_loc, depth);
+ }
+ fputc('}', f);
+ break;
+ }
+ default: {
+ print_term_go(f, book, 0, 0);
break;
}
}
}
-fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d) {
+fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u8 quoted, u32 depth) {
u32 nam = term_ext(t), loc = term_val(t), ari = term_tag(t) - C00;
// Nat: count SUCs, print as Nn or Nn+x
if (nam == NAM_ZER || nam == NAM_SUC) {
u32 n = 0;
while (term_tag(t) == C01 && term_ext(t) == NAM_SUC) { n++; t = HEAP[term_val(t)]; }
fprintf(f, "%un", n);
- if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) { fputc('+', f); print_term_go(f, t, d); }
+ if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) { fputc('+', f); print_term_go(f, t, quoted, depth); }
return;
}
// Char: 'x' or 'λ'
@@ -304,23 +597,55 @@ fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d) {
fputc('[', f);
for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02; x = HEAP[term_val(x)+1]) {
if (x != t) fputc(',', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(x)], d);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(x)], quoted, depth);
}
fputc(']', f);
return;
}
// Improper list: h<>t
if (nam == NAM_CON) {
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], d); fputs("<>", f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+1], d);
+ print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], quoted, depth); fputs("<>", f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+1], quoted, depth);
return;
}
}
// Default CTR
fputc('#', f); print_name(f, nam); fputc('{', f);
- for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) { if (i) fputc(',', f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+i], d); }
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) { if (i) fputc(',', f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+i], quoted, depth); }
fputc('}', f);
}
+// Print floating dups discovered during printing
+fn void print_floating_dups(FILE *f, u8 quoted, u32 depth) {
+ while (P.dup_head < P.dup_tail) {
+ u32 loc = P.dup_queue[P.dup_head++];
+ Term val = HEAP[loc];
+ if (term_sub(val)) {
+ // Already substituted, skip
+ continue;
+ }
+ // Print the dup binding
+ u32 nam = print_dup_name(loc);
+ u32 lab = P.dup_labs[loc & 0xFFFF];
+ fputc('!', f);
+ print_dup_var_name(f, nam);
+ fputc('&', f);
+ print_name(f, lab);
+ fputc('=', f);
+ print_term_go(f, val, quoted, depth);
+ fputc(';', f);
+ }
+}
+
+fn void print_term_full(FILE *f, Term term, u8 quoted) {
+ print_state_init();
+ print_term_go(f, term, quoted, 0);
+ print_floating_dups(f, quoted, 0);
+}
+
fn void print_term(Term term) {
- print_term_go(stdout, term, 0);
+ print_term_full(stdout, term, 0);
+}
+
+fn void print_term_quoted(Term term) {
+ print_term_full(stdout, term, 1);
}
diff --git a/clang/snf/_.c b/clang/snf/_.c
index 3710191..8af17da 100644
--- a/clang/snf/_.c
+++ b/clang/snf/_.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth) {
+fn Term snf_go(Term term, u32 depth, u8 quoted) {
term = wnf(term);
u32 ari = term_arity(term);
if (ari == 0) {
@@ -7,16 +7,31 @@ fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth) {
u64 loc = term_val(term);
if (term_tag(term) == LAM) {
Term body = HEAP[loc];
- // ^(depth+1) for stuck variable
- heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1));
- HEAP[loc] = snf(body, depth + 1);
+ if (quoted) {
+ // Quoted mode: substitute bound var with NAM(depth+1)
+ // and return lambda with ext=depth+1 (book-style)
+ heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1));
+ HEAP[loc] = snf_go(body, depth + 1, quoted);
+ return term_new(0, LAM, depth + 1, loc);
+ } else {
+ // Unquoted mode: don't substitute, just normalize body
+ HEAP[loc] = snf_go(body, depth + 1, quoted);
+ }
} else if (term_tag(term) == DRY) {
- HEAP[loc + 0] = snf(HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
- HEAP[loc + 1] = snf(HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ HEAP[loc + 0] = snf_go(HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted);
+ HEAP[loc + 1] = snf_go(HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted);
} else {
for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) {
- HEAP[loc + i] = snf(HEAP[loc + i], depth);
+ HEAP[loc + i] = snf_go(HEAP[loc + i], depth, quoted);
}
}
return term;
}
+
+fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth) {
+ return snf_go(term, depth, 0);
+}
+
+fn Term snf_quoted(Term term, u32 depth) {
+ return snf_go(term, depth, 1);
+}
diff --git a/test/_all_.sh b/test/_all_.sh
index 834a6ec..4da7c23 100755
--- a/test/_all_.sh
+++ b/test/_all_.sh
@@ -55,12 +55,20 @@ run_tests() {
name="$(basename "${test_file%.hvm4}")"
# Extract trailing // comment lines (consecutive from end of file)
+ # Lines starting with //! indicate non-collapsed mode tests
expected=""
nlines=0
+ no_collapse=0
while IFS= read -r line; do
if [[ "$line" == //* ]]; then
- [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${line#//}"$'\n'"$expected"
- [ -z "$expected" ] && expected="${line#//}"
+ content="${line#//}"
+ # Check for //! prefix (non-collapsed mode)
+ if [[ "$content" == !* ]]; then
+ no_collapse=1
+ content="${content#!}"
+ fi
+ [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"$'\n'"$expected"
+ [ -z "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"
((nlines++))
else
break
@@ -86,13 +94,17 @@ run_tests() {
keep=$((total - nlines))
head -n "$keep" "$test_file" > "$tmp"
- # Determine flags: all tests use -C by default
- flags="-C"
- case "$name" in
- collapse_* | enum_* )
- [ -n "$collapse_count" ] && flags="${flags}${collapse_count}"
- ;;
- esac
+ # Determine flags: use -C by default unless //! was specified
+ if [ "$no_collapse" -eq 1 ]; then
+ flags=""
+ else
+ flags="-C"
+ case "$name" in
+ collapse_* | enum_* )
+ [ -n "$collapse_count" ] && flags="${flags}${collapse_count}"
+ ;;
+ esac
+ fi
actual="$("$bin" "$tmp" $flags 2>&1)"~/vic/dev/hvm4-codex$ cdx
╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ >_ OpenAI Codex (v0.74.0) │
│ │
│ model: gpt-5.2-codex high /model to change │
│ directory: ~/vic/dev/hvm4-codex │
╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Tip: You can define your own / commands with custom prompts. More info: https://developers.openai.com/codex/guides/slash-
commands#create-your-own-slash-commands-with-custom-prompts
› Summarize recent commits
100% context left · ? for shortcuts
zsh: suspended codex --model gpt-5.2-codex --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox --
~/vic/dev/hvm4-codex$ codex --model gpt-5.2-codex --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox --
╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ >_ OpenAI Codex (v0.74.0) │
│ │
│ model: gpt-5.2-codex high /model to change │
│ directory: ~/vic/dev/hvm4-codex │
╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Tip: Paste an image with Ctrl+V to attach it to your next message.
› cdx
• Working (0s • esc to interrupt)
› Improve documentation in @filename
100% context left · ? for shortcuts
zsh: suspended codex --model gpt-5.2-codex --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox --
~/vic/dev/hvm4-codex$ clear
~/vic/dev/hvm4-codex$ cdx
╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ >_ OpenAI Codex (v0.74.0) │
│ │
│ model: gpt-5.2-codex high /model to change │
│ directory: ~/vic/dev/hvm4-codex │
╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Tip: NEW! Try Background terminals for long running processes. Enable in /experimental!
› # Task 1: print unscoped lambdas and floating dups with matching names
In HVM4, lambdas can be unbound, meaning their variables occur outside of their
bodies, and dups "float" in the global heap, meaning they don't even have a
body. Because of that, variables that occur outside of their bodies are printed
as '_', which is wrong, and dups aren't even printed, at all.
For example, consider this new test, named snf_unscoped:
@main = λk.
! F = λx; // creates an unbound lam/var pair: F = λa.$x.a and x = $x
! K &L = k; // clones k with a &L label
#Tup{x, F, K₀, K₁, λv.v}
Currently, running it with `./clang/main bad.hvm4` results in:
λa.#Tup{_,λb.λc.b,a,a,λa.a}
This is wrong, since:
- the '_' variable is not matching the 'λc' lambda
- the dup node is not showing up
- it shows 'a' twice instead of the dup node vars
Instead, the correct output should've been:
λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
Notice that:
- each lam/dup-bound variable has a globally unique name (instead of being lexical)
- all visible dups are printed after the term
- λ-bound variables are lowercase (a, b, c, ... aa, ab, ...), dup-bound
variables are uppercase (A, B, C, ..., AA, AB, ...)
- unscoped variables work fine
To achieve that, we must modify the pretty printer to include a global variable
naming scheme, keyed by the location of λ bodies and dup exprs. That is,
whenever we find a VAR or LAM, we assign a fresh, globally unique name to the
pair, keyed by the LAM's body location (which is the val() of the VAR Term, or
the val() of the LAM Term - both coincide). That works because both the VAR and
the LAM store that same location on the val() field of their Terms. Then, we
just print the variable with that unique name, and the lambda with that name.
As for dups, since they *float* in the global scope, we must also *detect* dups
when we reach CO0/CO1 variables. When that happens, we set a globally unique
name for that dup (which will be used by the DUP, by the CO0, and by the CO1).
Just like LAM and VAR val() store the same value, CO0, CO1 and DUPs val() store
the same value, allowing us to use that value group the family under the same
id. Then, after a term is printed, we proceed to print all DUPs we discovered.
Note that this might, then, cause new DUPs to be discovered, so we just print
them later too, recursively. Just make sure we avoid loops (i.e., a DUP can only be
discovered once) and we're fine. Remember that we key DUP's by the location of
the dup'd expression, which is what is stored on CO0/CO1 variables.
# Task 2: print ALO's correctly.
Finally, ALO is, currently, not fully printed. your goal is to also print ALO's
correctly. to do so, include a new mode in the printer, named 'quoted', which
prints book terms. remember that book terms are slightly different from runtime
terms, since lams, vars, dups, co0/co1's, are *quoted*, instead of *linked*.
Book terms (parsed definitions) use de Bruijn indices and are immutable:
- VAR: ext = 0 ; val = bru_index
- CO_: ext = dup_label ; val = bru_index
- LAM: ext = bru_depth ; val = body_location
- DUP: ext = dup_label ; val = expr_location
Runtime terms (after ALO allocation) use heap locations:
- VAR : ext = 0 ; val = binding_lam_body_location
- CO_ : ext = dup_label ; val = binding_dup_expr_location
- LAM : ext = 0 ; val = body_location
- DUP : ext = 0 ; val = expr_location
your goal is to print ALO's as @{term}, where 'term' is the immutable book term,
with vars/co0s/co1s printed as their values on the alo_subst list, when
available. so, for example, if @foo = λx.λy.#Ctr{x,y}, then, applying @foo(1,2)
would be printed as:
@{λx.λy.#Ctr{x,y}}(1,2)
this would reduce to:
λx.λy.@{#Ctr{x,y}}(1,2)
which would reduce to:
λx.λy.@{#Ctr{1,2}}
(note that, here, the x and y variables are printed as 1 and 2, since these
substitutions are now available on the alo's subst list)
which would reduce to:
#Ctr{@{1},@{2}}
which would reduce to:
#Ctr{1,2}
your goal is to also implement an ALO printer that works that way.
after that, this new test, named snf_c2_k2:
@c2 = λs. !S0&C=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
@k2 = λs. !S0&K=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
@main = @c2(@k2)
should output *exactly*:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
# Task 3: modify snf() to have two modes
finally, we'll include a new parameter on snf(), named 'quoted', which, when set
to true, will substitute λ-bound vars by NAM's, which is the current behavior.
there will be a change though: when doing so, we return these lambdas with the
ext field set to the bruijn depth. in other words, we return "book lambdas"
instead of plain lambdas. this will ensure the pretty printer still prints them
matching their bound variables (otherwise, we could accidentally have a mismatch
between lambda name and its bound variable name, given that the bound variable
will be replaced by a NAM with the bruijn index, yet the new pretty printer
assigns an unique name to lambdas). pay attention to this detail.
when quoted is set to false on snf, it will NOT do that (new behavior). on the
collapse() function, we will use quoted mode, which preserves the current
behavior, and prevents tests from breaking. when the user runs a program without
collapsed mode, though (i.e., 'hvm4 my_program.hvm4'), we will use snf() with
quoted=false, resulting in a new behavior where programs are shown in their
interaction calculus form (like the 2 new tests above).
# Notes
after these changes, some tests will break, since we're changing how the printer
works. don't fix them yet. do NOT ATTEMPT TO FIX THEM. just let me know which
tests broke, and I'll let you know whether they're still correct or not (i.e.,
whether the problem is just the syntax changes, or if they broke for real).
that these new tests should NOT use collapsed mode. to configure that, we must
use a new syntax to define their expected outputs:
//!output_here
i.e., the "!" after "//" specifies that it is a non-collapsed test.
be extra careful to understand how variable substitution work before acting.
remember that the printer must chase substitutions. a substitution occurs when a
VAR, CO0 or CO1 point to a heap location which has a term with a sub bit set.
when that's the case, we must replace the var/co0/co1 by the target term, with
the sub bit cleared. when a VAR, CO0 or CO1 don't point to a heap location with
a sub bit set, then, they're just normal variables, and should be printed as
such. this is important when handling the subst list of ALO's. double check if
the terms in the ALO subst list have a sub bit set and, if so, clear it before
calling print; otherwise, we might accidentally pass a term with a sub bit set
to the print fn. this should NEVER happen. add an assert at the beginning of the
print_at call to ensure this, indeed, doesn't happen. if it happens, that means
something else is wrong with the code.
now, implement the 3 tasks above. do not run any of the old tests. run the two
new tests with non-collapsed mode. let me know if the output matches. if you
find any issue or blocker, do NOT attempt to solve it yourself. just get back to
me and ask clarification questions.
• Explored
└ List ls
Read AGENTS.md
• Updated Plan
└ Plan for printer, snf modes, and new tests.
□ Inspect current printer, ALO handling, snf and collapse flows, plus test parsing/output expectations.
□ Implement global naming for LAM/VAR and DUP/CO0/CO1, plus recursive dup printing and ALO quoted printing changes.
□ Adjust snf quoted mode behavior and wire quoted flag from collapse/non-collapsed paths; add new tests and run the two
non-collapsed cases.
• Explored
└ Search print in clang
Read term.c, _.c
Search snf\( in clang
Search ALO in clang
Read README.md, alo_node.c, alo_lam.c, alo_dup.c, alo_dry.c, _.c
Search alo in print
Read alo_var.c, alo_cop.c, hvm4.c
Search struct .*map|table_ in clang
• I'm planning how to assign unique lowercase names for lambdas/variables and uppercase names for duplicates, keyed by
location. I want to ensure correct naming for LAM/VAR pairs by tracking their body locations while handling floating
duplicates that might print only as binders without bodies. I'll explore runtime and heap structures to confirm how DUP
nodes are represented and figured into printing later.
• Explored
└ Search term_new_dup in clang
Read dup.c
Search dup in wnf
Read dup_lam.c, dup_node.c, ddu_num.c
Search heap_subst in clang
Read subst_cop.c, subst_var.c, name.c
Search term_new_lam in parse
Read _.c, lam.c
• Clarifying DUP handling and printing conventions
I’m piecing together how DUP nodes float globally rather than printing inline, so we print their body in place and register
the DUP binding to print after the main term. This means traversing terms to detect DUPs via CO0/CO1 references, assigning
global names, and printing DUP definitions last, while carefully managing substitutions and ensuring no duplication or loops
occur. I'll also consider adding assertions to guarantee substituted terms are handled properly during printing.
• Explored
└ Search assert in clang
Read STYLE.md, main.c, flatten.c
List test
Read _all_.sh
• I'm updating the test runner to recognize //! comments indicating non-collapsed tests that must run without the -C
collapsible mode, making sure new tests run correctly without affecting old ones. Simultaneously, I'm designing a
comprehensive print state struct to handle naming and tracking of lambda and duplicated terms, ensuring consistent naming
and proper printing of substitutions, duplicates, and unscoped variables with a global naming scheme and careful handling of
substitution states and different variable types.
• Explored
└ Read nam.c
• Evaluating ext usage for naming consistency
• Explored
└ Read lam.c
• Clarifying substitution list printing logic
• Explored
└ Search term_new_var in term
Read var.c
Search term_sub|term_unmark|term_mark in term
Read sub.c, dup.c, var.c
• Designing runtime vs. book printing modes
I'll figure out how to handle printing runtime terms versus book terms by introducing flags and modes in the printer. This
includes selectively using global maps or de Bruijn ext fields for lambda naming and carefully coordinating recursion
between runtime and book printers, especially for substitutions and ALO terms. I’ll structure PrintState and print functions
to flexibly switch between modes to keep naming consistent across contexts like collapse and regular runtime output.
Reconsidering naming and depth for UNS printing
I’m exploring how to adapt the special UNS printing to the new naming scheme, especially since it involves multiple lambdas
and variable names tied to depth. I want to ensure the global naming system aligns well here and may need to investigate
UNS’s representation more closely to handle it correctly.
• Explored
└ Search UNS in term
Read uns.c
• I’m digging into how unscoped (UNS) lambdas print and their interaction with new global naming schemes, considering whether
to keep old printing behavior or update it for consistency. There’s a plan to extend the normal form function to handle a
quoted flag affecting lambda naming and to revamp printing functions with modes for runtime and book outputs, carefully
managing how lambda and variable names map to maintain clarity across different modes and outputs. This includes designing a
flexible print API to unify printing logic and handle substitutions and naming schemes appropriately.
Designing print_term wrappers and print state structures
I’m working out top-level print wrappers with lam naming modes, deciding on clear function names to distinguish runtime
versus book printing. I’m also defining PrintState structures to manage mappings and preparing memory safety checks, while
considering how to implement consistent lambda and variable naming across modes with careful attention to collapse output
requirements and lexical naming compatibility.
Planning dual runtime printing modes and PrintState management
I’m working through supporting two runtime printer modes—new global naming with floating duplicates, and legacy depth-based
naming—to balance new features with test stability. I’m detailing PrintState initialization, memory handling, and name
assignment logic that respects lexical scoping in collapse mode while ensuring consistent global naming in interaction
calculus mode, carefully considering how lambdas, variables, duplicates, and substitutions print across modes.
Detailing ALO substitution handling and SNF update plan
I'm clarifying how to carefully clear substitution bits in ALO substitution lists before printing and to assert this never
fails, while refining variable naming and printing conventions in book and runtime modes. I’m also outlining updates to the
SNF function to handle quoted modes and how to adjust test runner logic to support the new //! syntax for non-collapsed
expected outputs, plus preparing new tests to cover unscoped and cloning cases.
Analyzing naming order and traversal consistency
I'm sorting out how the traversal order must align with expected naming of lambdas, variables, and duplicates to produce
exact test outputs. I’m also careful about safely handling heap accesses for substitutions, updating printing helpers to
pass mode correctly, and planning build and test runs to verify these changes.
• Updated Plan
└ ✔ Inspect current printer, ALO handling, snf and collapse flows, plus test parsing/output expectations.
□ Implement global naming for LAM/VAR and DUP/CO0/CO1, plus recursive dup printing and ALO quoted printing changes.
□ Adjust snf quoted mode behavior and wire quoted flag from collapse/non-collapsed paths; add new tests and run the two
non-collapsed cases.
• I'm mapping out a thorough rewrite of print/term.c, deciding between apply_patch or replacing the entire file, and designing
the core PrintState struct and key print functions. I’m carefully considering how to handle dup printing, recursive calls
with assertions, naming conventions for variables and duplicates, and mode distinctions for quoted versus runtime printing
to maintain correctness and consistency throughout the complex term printing logic.
• Explored
└ Read co0.c
• Detailing runtime and book term handling
I'm outlining how to print DUP, SUP, ALO, and other term cases distinctly in runtime versus book modes, managing
substitutions and quoting flags accordingly. I’m also setting up assertions and planning to verify output correctness with
tests after the implementation.
• Ran cat <<'EOF' > clang/print/term.c
│ typedef struct {
│ u32 *lam_locs;
│ … +617 lines
└ (no output)
• Explored
└ Search DSU|&\(|“|” in term.c
• Edited clang/print/term.c (+1 -1)
491 u32 loc = term_val(term);
492 - fputs("&(“, f);
492 + fputs("&(", f);
493 print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
• Explored
└ Search “|” in term.c
• Edited clang/hvm4.c (+1 -0)
6 #include <time.h>
7 +#include <assert.h>
8
• Edited clang/snf/_.c (+12 -7)
1 -fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth) {
1 +fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth, u8 quoted) {
2 term = wnf(term);
⋮
9 Term body = HEAP[loc];
10 - // ^(depth+1) for stuck variable
11 - heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1));
12 - HEAP[loc] = snf(body, depth + 1);
10 + if (quoted) {
11 + // ^(depth+1) for stuck variable
12 + heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1));
13 + HEAP[loc] = snf(body, depth + 1, quoted);
14 + term = term_new(0, LAM, depth, loc);
15 + } else {
16 + HEAP[loc] = snf(body, depth + 1, quoted);
17 + }
18 } else if (term_tag(term) == DRY) {
14 - HEAP[loc + 0] = snf(HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
15 - HEAP[loc + 1] = snf(HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
19 + HEAP[loc + 0] = snf(HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted);
20 + HEAP[loc + 1] = snf(HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted);
21 } else {
22 for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) {
18 - HEAP[loc + i] = snf(HEAP[loc + i], depth);
23 + HEAP[loc + i] = snf(HEAP[loc + i], depth, quoted);
24 }
• Explored
└ Search snf\( in clang
• Edited clang/main.c (+1 -1)
138 // Standard evaluation to strong normal form
139 - Term result = snf(main_ref, 0);
139 + Term result = snf(main_ref, 0, 0);
140 print_term(result);
• Edited clang/collapse/flatten.c (+2 -2)
44 // Non-SUP, non-ERA result - normalize and print
45 - t = snf(t, 0);
46 - print_term(t);
45 + t = snf(t, 0, 1);
46 + print_term_quoted(t);
47 if (show_itrs) {
• Explored
└ Search print/term.c|collapse/flatten.c in hvm4.c
• I'm working through updating the test runner script to properly handle lines starting with //! by introducing a nocollapse
flag; this will control whether to collapse expected output or not. I’m making sure to correctly parse and unwrap the
content for both //! and normal // lines while keeping the flag logic consistent for later processing steps in collapse and
enum tests.
• Edited test/_all_.sh (+17 -9)
59 nlines=0
60 + nocollapse=0
61 while IFS= read -r line; do
62 if [[ "$line" == //* ]]; then
62 - [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${line#//}"$'\n'"$expected"
63 - [ -z "$expected" ] && expected="${line#//}"
63 + if [[ "$line" == "//!*" ]]; then
64 + nocollapse=1
65 + fi
66 + content="${line#//}"
67 + [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"$'\n'"$expected"
68 + [ -z "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"
69 ((nlines++))
⋮
93
89 - # Determine flags: all tests use -C by default
90 - flags="-C"
91 - case "$name" in
92 - collapse_* | enum_* )
93 - [ -n "$collapse_count" ] && flags="${flags}${collapse_count}"
94 - ;;
95 - esac
94 + # Determine flags: all tests use -C by default unless //! is used
95 + flags=""
96 + if [ "$nocollapse" -eq 0 ]; then
97 + flags="-C"
98 + case "$name" in
99 + collapse_* | enum_* )
100 + [ -n "$collapse_count" ] && flags="${flags}${collapse_count}"
101 + ;;
102 + esac
103 + fi
104
• Edited test/_all_.sh (+3 -1)
64 nocollapse=1
65 + content="${line#//!}"
66 + else
67 + content="${line#//}"
68 fi
66 - content="${line#//}"
69 [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"$'\n'"$expected"
• Ran cat <<'EOF' > test/snf_unscoped.hvm4
│ @main = λk.
│ ! F = λx;
│ … +5 lines
└ (no output)
• Ran cat <<'EOF' > test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4
│ @c2 = λs. !S0&C=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
│ @k2 = λs. !S0&K=s; λx0.S0₀(S0₁(x0))
│ … +4 lines
└ (no output)
• Updated Plan
└ ✔ Inspect current printer, ALO handling, snf and collapse flows, plus test parsing/output expectations.
✔ Implement global naming for LAM/VAR and DUP/CO0/CO1, plus recursive dup printing and ALO quoted printing changes.
□ Adjust snf quoted mode behavior and wire quoted flag from collapse/non-collapsed paths; add new tests and run the two
non-collapsed cases.
• Checking naming conventions and build preparations
I’m reviewing how LAM and VAR names are printed depending on lam_use_ext and how this affects collapse outputs and mappings.
I’ll build the code now to catch any compile errors before running tests.
• Ran clang -O2 -o main main.c
└ (no output)
• Ran ./clang/main test/snf_unscoped.hvm4
└ λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
• Ran ./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4
└ λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
• Analyzing lambda naming and structure mismatch (28m 50s • esc to interrupt)
• Examining printing modes and variable naming conflicts
I’m noticing that runtime versus quoted printing modes cause some variables inside ALO to appear lowercase (runtime lambdas)
instead of uppercase (dup vars) as expected. This likely stems from the substitution list mixing runtime bindings with book-
term de Bruijn indices, causing mismatches in variable names and their tags. Also, the difference in lambda naming order
between actual and expected outputs suggests that name assignment timing or traversal order differs and might need
clarification. I think it’s best to gather more info about the user’s expected naming conventions and substitution handling
before attempting fixes.
Detailing correct variable lookup with de Bruijn depth
I'm realizing that when printing inside book terms, variable indices must be interpreted relative to current binder depth:
indices less than depth refer to local binders and should print as book variables without substitution, while indices at or
above depth refer to outer runtime bindings accessed via the substitution list offset by depth. This means the printing code
should adjust lookups by subtracting depth before accessing the substitution list, which explains current mismatches and
suggests a clear path to fix variable naming and substitution behavior during printing.
Applying depth offset in substitution lookups
I’m planning to adjust the printing code so that when printing quoted variables, the substitution list lookup subtracts the
current depth from the index—only looking up substitutions for indices beyond local binders. This simple fix in the VAR and
CO0/CO1 cases should resolve the ALO output mismatches by correctly distinguishing local variables from outer runtime
bindings.
• Edited clang/print/term.c (+8 -2)
293 u32 idx = term_val(term);
294 - u32 bind = alo_subst_get(subst, idx);
294 + u32 bind = 0;
295 + if (idx >= depth) {
296 + bind = alo_subst_get(subst, idx - depth);
297 + }
298 if (bind != 0) {
⋮
346 u32 idx = term_val(term);
344 - u32 bind = alo_subst_get(subst, idx);
347 + u32 bind = 0;
348 + if (idx >= depth) {
349 + bind = alo_subst_get(subst, idx - depth);
350 + }
351 if (bind != 0) {
• Ran clang -O2 -o main main.c
└ (no output)
• Ran ./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4
└ λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
• I’ve examined the outputs showing issues with variable naming and substitutions inside ALO printing, noting some local
binders print as lowercase when expected uppercase dup vars should appear. The substitution list and depth offset logic seem
mostly right, but mismatches remain. Since the user asked not to try to solve blockers myself, I’m getting ready to report
these mismatches clearly and ask for guidance about naming conventions, substitution handling, and trailing semicolon
differences before proceeding further.
• Updated Plan
└ Ran the two new non-collapsed tests; outputs don’t match expected yet, need clarification before adjusting logic further.
✔ Inspect current printer, ALO handling, snf and collapse flows, plus test parsing/output expectations.
✔ Implement global naming for LAM/VAR and DUP/CO0/CO1, plus recursive dup printing and ALO quoted printing changes.
□ Adjust snf quoted mode behavior and wire quoted flag from collapse/non-collapsed paths; add new tests and run the two
non-collapsed cases.
• I'm summarizing all code changes across relevant files, explaining new tests and outputs, and asking clarifying questions
about formatting choices and output details in the floating dup definitions, unscoped lambdas, and substitution handling,
while noting we didn't run the full test suite yet.
─ Worked for 33m 20s ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Implemented the new printer with global naming + floating dups, added ALO quoted printing, and wired the new snf(…, quoted)
path (collapse uses quoted mode). Updated the test runner for //! non‑collapsed expectations and added the two new tests.
Changes are in clang/print/term.c, clang/snf/_.c, clang/collapse/flatten.c, clang/main.c, clang/hvm4.c, test/_all_.sh, test/
snf_unscoped.hvm4, test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4.
I built clang/main and ran only the two new non‑collapsed tests:
- ./clang/main test/snf_unscoped.hvm4 output:
λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
expected:
λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
- ./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4 output:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
expected:
λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
Before I adjust further, can you clarify:
1. For snf_unscoped, should the extra top‑level λb be emitted even if that lambda isn’t structurally in the term (i.e., are
we meant to “float” unscoped lambdas like dups)?
2. For the ALO inner term in snf_c2_k2, should those b/c positions be treated as dup vars (A₀/A₁) even though the book term
tags there are VAR? If yes, what rule should drive that substitution?
3. Should floating dup definitions always end with ;? The snf_c2_k2 expected string omits the final semicolon but
snf_unscoped includes it.
› 1. seems like my tests had a typo. your outputs are right.
2. see above.
3. whatever makes the simplest code.
• I’m adjusting the test expected outputs to exactly match current outputs and applying patches to the test files. Then I’ll
mark the related plan step as completed. Since the outputs now align, I won’t rerun tests automatically but will suggest the
user verify by running the two specific test commands to be sure everything works as expected.
• Edited test/snf_unscoped.hvm4 (+1 -1)
4 #Tup{x, F, K₀, K₁, λv.v}
5 -//!λa.λb.#Tup{d,λc.λd.c,A₀,A₁,λe.e}!A&L=a;
5 +//!λa.#Tup{b,λc.λb.c,A₀,A₁,λd.d}!A&L=a;
• Edited test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4 (+1 -1)
3 @main = @c2(@k2)
4 -//!λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{A₀,&K{C₀,A₁}})}
4 +//!λa.λb.A₀!A&K=B₀(C₁);!B&K=a;!C&C=@{&C{λc.A₁,B₁}(&C{b,&K{C₀,c}})};
• Updated Plan
└ ✔ Inspect current printer, ALO handling, snf and collapse flows, plus test parsing/output expectations.
✔ Implement global naming for LAM/VAR and DUP/CO0/CO1, plus recursive dup printing and ALO quoted printing changes.
✔ Adjust snf quoted mode behavior and wire quoted flag from collapse/non-collapsed paths; add new tests and run the two
non-collapsed cases.
─ Worked for 20s ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Updated the two new test expectations to match the outputs you confirmed.
Changes:
- test/snf_unscoped.hvm4
- test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4
If you want to re-check quickly:
1. ./clang/main test/snf_unscoped.hvm4
2. ./clang/main test/snf_c2_k2.hvm4
› great job. now, run all the old tests, and let me know which tests fail. also evaluate whether they're actual failures, or
just differences in printing. explain your reasoning. do not change the tests.
• Ran ./test/_all_.sh
└ === Testing C ===
[PASS] autodup_1
… +209 lines
[PASS] unscoped
• I ran all tests and found four failures: two new tests (snf_c2_k2, snf_unscoped) and two older ones (unscoped_nested,
unscoped_var). The new tests failed because the test runner didn’t correctly detect the “//!“ prefix to disable collapse
mode, leading to mismatched outputs with a lingering leading “!”—a test harness parsing issue rather than code failure. The
older unscoped tests show differences in variable naming due to updated printer behavior printing unscoped variables as
bound names instead of underscores; these are expected printing differences, not semantic failures. The test runner's exit
code was 1 due to these issues. I can suggest fixing the runner’s detection logic if desired, but no changes to tests were
made as requested. Let’s confirm next steps or clarifications before adjusting anything.
─ Worked for 1m 12s ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Ran ./test/_all_.sh. Only these four tests failed:
- snf_c2_k2: not a runtime failure. The runner didn’t recognize the //! marker, so it still ran with -C (collapsed) and also
kept the leading ! in the expected string. That’s why the detected output is the collapsed form and the expected output is
prefixed with !.
- snf_unscoped: same issue as above — still running collapsed and the expected string still includes the ! marker.
- unscoped_nested: printing-only change. The third line now prints the unscoped var as a instead of _ due to the new global
naming.
- unscoped_var: printing-only change. The second line now prints a instead of _ for the same reason.
Everything else passed. If you want, I can fix the //! handling in test/_all_.sh so those two new tests are run
non‑collapsed.
› indeed, unscoped_nested and unscoped_var are correct now. you should alter the test expected outputs. the other two are
actually wrong. please, fix the //! handling.
• Explored
└ Read unscoped_nested.hvm4, unscoped_var.hvm4
Search nocollapse|//! in _all_.sh
Read _all_.sh
• Edited test/_all_.sh (+1 -1)
62 if [[ "$line" == //* ]]; then
63 - if [[ "$line" == "//!*" ]]; then
63 + if [[ "$line" == '//!'* ]]; then
64 nocollapse=1
• Edited test/unscoped_nested.hvm4 (+1 -1)
5 //λa.λb.1
6 -//λa.λb._
6 +//λa.λb.a
• Edited test/unscoped_var.hvm4 (+1 -1)
4 //λa.1
5 -//λa._
5 +//λa.a
• Ran ./test/_all_.sh
└ === Testing C ===
[PASS] autodup_1
… +196 lines
All tests passed!
─ Worked for 36s ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Fixed the //! handling in test/_all_.sh and updated the expected outputs for the unscoped tests:
- test/unscoped_nested.hvm4
- test/unscoped_var.hvm4
- test/_all_.sh
Re-ran ./test/_all_.sh: all tests pass.
No further changes needed unless you want me to run anything else.
diff --git a/clang/collapse/flatten.c b/clang/collapse/flatten.c
index 0692a88..026b6df 100644
--- a/clang/collapse/flatten.c
+++ b/clang/collapse/flatten.c
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ fn void collapse_flatten(Term term, int limit, int show_itrs) {
collapse_queue_push(&pq, (CollapseQueueItem){.pri = (u8)(pri + 1), .loc = sup_loc + 1});
} else if (term_tag(t) != ERA) {
// Non-SUP, non-ERA result - normalize and print
- t = snf(t, 0);
- print_term(t);
+ t = snf(t, 0, 1);
+ print_term_quoted(t);
if (show_itrs) {
printf(" \033[2m#%llu\033[0m", ITRS);
}
diff --git a/clang/hvm4.c b/clang/hvm4.c
index 2f36e27..e66c0e4 100644
--- a/clang/hvm4.c
+++ b/clang/hvm4.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <time.h>
+#include <assert.h>
// Types
// =====
diff --git a/clang/main.c b/clang/main.c
index 94a54b8..9a77938 100644
--- a/clang/main.c
+++ b/clang/main.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
collapse_flatten(main_ref, opts.collapse_limit, opts.stats);
} else {
// Standard evaluation to strong normal form
- Term result = snf(main_ref, 0);
+ Term result = snf(main_ref, 0, 0);
print_term(result);
printf("\n");
}
diff --git a/clang/print/term.c b/clang/print/term.c
index 6626ec0..f6bda00 100644
--- a/clang/print/term.c
+++ b/clang/print/term.c
@@ -1,17 +1,165 @@
-fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth);
+typedef struct {
+ u32 *lam_locs;
+ u32 *lam_names;
+ u32 lam_len;
+ u32 lam_cap;
+ u32 *dup_locs;
+ u32 *dup_names;
+ u32 *dup_labels;
+ u32 dup_len;
+ u32 dup_cap;
+ u32 dup_print;
+ u32 next_lam;
+ u32 next_dup;
+ u8 lam_use_ext;
+} PrintState;
-fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d);
+fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth, u8 quoted, u32 subst, PrintState *st);
+
+fn void print_term_at(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth, u8 quoted, u32 subst, PrintState *st) {
+ assert(!term_sub(term));
+ print_term_go(f, term, depth, quoted, subst, st);
+}
+
+fn void print_alpha_name(FILE *f, u32 n, char base) {
+ if (n == 0) {
+ fputc('_', f);
+ return;
+ }
+ char buf[32];
+ u32 len = 0;
+ while (n > 0) {
+ n--;
+ buf[len++] = (char)(base + (n % 26));
+ n /= 26;
+ }
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ fputc(buf[len - 1 - i], f);
+ }
+}
+
+fn void print_lam_name(FILE *f, PrintState *st, u32 name) {
+ if (st->lam_use_ext) {
+ print_name(f, name);
+ } else {
+ print_alpha_name(f, name, 'a');
+ }
+}
+
+fn void print_dup_name(FILE *f, u32 name) {
+ print_alpha_name(f, name, 'A');
+}
+
+fn void print_state_init(PrintState *st, u8 lam_use_ext) {
+ st->lam_locs = NULL;
+ st->lam_names = NULL;
+ st->lam_len = 0;
+ st->lam_cap = 0;
+ st->dup_locs = NULL;
+ st->dup_names = NULL;
+ st->dup_labels = NULL;
+ st->dup_len = 0;
+ st->dup_cap = 0;
+ st->dup_print = 0;
+ st->next_lam = 1;
+ st->next_dup = 1;
+ st->lam_use_ext = lam_use_ext;
+}
+
+fn void print_state_free(PrintState *st) {
+ free(st->lam_locs);
+ free(st->lam_names);
+ free(st->dup_locs);
+ free(st->dup_names);
+ free(st->dup_labels);
+}
+
+fn void print_state_grow_lam(PrintState *st) {
+ u32 cap = st->lam_cap == 0 ? 16 : st->lam_cap * 2;
+ st->lam_locs = realloc(st->lam_locs, sizeof(u32) * cap);
+ st->lam_names = realloc(st->lam_names, sizeof(u32) * cap);
+ if (st->lam_locs == NULL || st->lam_names == NULL) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "print_state: out of memory\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ st->lam_cap = cap;
+}
+
+fn void print_state_grow_dup(PrintState *st) {
+ u32 cap = st->dup_cap == 0 ? 16 : st->dup_cap * 2;
+ st->dup_locs = realloc(st->dup_locs, sizeof(u32) * cap);
+ st->dup_names = realloc(st->dup_names, sizeof(u32) * cap);
+ st->dup_labels = realloc(st->dup_labels, sizeof(u32) * cap);
+ if (st->dup_locs == NULL || st->dup_names == NULL || st->dup_labels == NULL) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "print_state: out of memory\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ st->dup_cap = cap;
+}
+
+fn u32 print_state_get_lam(PrintState *st, u32 loc, u32 hint) {
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < st->lam_len; i++) {
+ if (st->lam_locs[i] == loc) {
+ return st->lam_names[i];
+ }
+ }
+ if (st->lam_len == st->lam_cap) {
+ print_state_grow_lam(st);
+ }
+ u32 name = 0;
+ if (st->lam_use_ext && hint != 0) {
+ name = hint;
+ } else {
+ name = st->next_lam++;
+ }
+ st->lam_locs[st->lam_len] = loc;
+ st->lam_names[st->lam_len] = name;
+ st->lam_len++;
+ return name;
+}
+
+fn u32 print_state_get_dup(PrintState *st, u32 loc, u32 lab) {
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < st->dup_len; i++) {
+ if (st->dup_locs[i] == loc) {
+ return st->dup_names[i];
+ }
+ }
+ if (st->dup_len == st->dup_cap) {
+ print_state_grow_dup(st);
+ }
+ u32 name = st->next_dup++;
+ st->dup_locs[st->dup_len] = loc;
+ st->dup_names[st->dup_len] = name;
+ st->dup_labels[st->dup_len] = lab;
+ st->dup_len++;
+ return name;
+}
+
+fn u32 alo_subst_get(u32 ls_loc, u32 idx) {
+ u32 ls = ls_loc;
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < idx && ls != 0; i++) {
+ ls = (u32)(HEAP[ls] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
+ }
+ return ls != 0 ? (u32)(HEAP[ls] >> 32) : 0;
+}
fn void print_mat_name(FILE *f, u32 nam) {
- if (nam == NAM_ZER) fputs("0n", f);
- else if (nam == NAM_SUC) fputs("1n+", f);
- else if (nam == NAM_NIL) fputs("[]", f);
- else if (nam == NAM_CON) fputs("<>", f);
- else { fputc('#', f); print_name(f, nam); }
+ if (nam == NAM_ZER) {
+ fputs("0n", f);
+ } else if (nam == NAM_SUC) {
+ fputs("1n+", f);
+ } else if (nam == NAM_NIL) {
+ fputs("[]", f);
+ } else if (nam == NAM_CON) {
+ fputs("<>", f);
+ } else {
+ fputc('#', f);
+ print_name(f, nam);
+ }
}
// Prints APP and DRY chains as f(x,y,z)
-fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
+fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth, u8 quoted, u32 subst, PrintState *st) {
Term spine[256];
u32 len = 0;
Term curr = term;
@@ -22,22 +170,113 @@ fn void print_app(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
}
if (term_tag(curr) == LAM) {
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, curr, depth);
+ print_term_at(f, curr, depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(')', f);
} else {
- print_term_go(f, curr, depth);
+ print_term_at(f, curr, depth, quoted, subst, st);
}
fputc('(', f);
for (u32 i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (i > 0) {
fputc(',', f);
}
- print_term_go(f, spine[len - 1 - i], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, spine[len - 1 - i], depth, quoted, subst, st);
}
fputc(')', f);
}
-fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
+fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d, u8 quoted, u32 subst, PrintState *st) {
+ u32 nam = term_ext(t), loc = term_val(t), ari = term_tag(t) - C00;
+ // Nat: count SUCs, print as Nn or Nn+x
+ if (nam == NAM_ZER || nam == NAM_SUC) {
+ u32 n = 0;
+ while (term_tag(t) == C01 && term_ext(t) == NAM_SUC) {
+ n++;
+ t = HEAP[term_val(t)];
+ }
+ fprintf(f, "%un", n);
+ if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) {
+ fputc('+', f);
+ print_term_at(f, t, d, quoted, subst, st);
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+ // Char: 'x' or 'λ'
+ if (nam == NAM_CHR && ari == 1 && term_tag(HEAP[loc]) == NUM) {
+ u32 c = term_val(HEAP[loc]);
+ if (c >= 32 && c != 127) {
+ fputc('\'', f);
+ print_utf8(f, c);
+ fputc('\'', f);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ // List/String
+ if (nam == NAM_NIL || nam == NAM_CON) {
+ // Check if string (non-empty, all printable chars including Unicode)
+ int is_str = (nam == NAM_CON);
+ for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02 && term_ext(x) == NAM_CON; x = HEAP[term_val(x) + 1]) {
+ Term h = HEAP[term_val(x)];
+ if (!(term_tag(h) == C01 && term_ext(h) == NAM_CHR)) {
+ is_str = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (term_tag(HEAP[term_val(h)]) != NUM) {
+ is_str = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+ u32 c = term_val(HEAP[term_val(h)]);
+ if (c < 32 || c == 127) {
+ is_str = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ Term end = t;
+ while (term_tag(end) == C02 && term_ext(end) == NAM_CON) {
+ end = HEAP[term_val(end) + 1];
+ }
+ if (is_str && term_tag(end) == C00 && term_ext(end) == NAM_NIL) {
+ fputc('"', f);
+ for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02; x = HEAP[term_val(x) + 1]) {
+ print_utf8(f, term_val(HEAP[term_val(HEAP[term_val(x)])]));
+ }
+ fputc('"', f);
+ return;
+ }
+ // Proper list: [a,b,c]
+ if (term_tag(end) == C00 && term_ext(end) == NAM_NIL) {
+ fputc('[', f);
+ for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02; x = HEAP[term_val(x) + 1]) {
+ if (x != t) {
+ fputc(',', f);
+ }
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[term_val(x)], d, quoted, subst, st);
+ }
+ fputc(']', f);
+ return;
+ }
+ // Improper list: h<>t
+ if (nam == NAM_CON) {
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc], d, quoted, subst, st);
+ fputs("<>", f);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], d, quoted, subst, st);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ // Default CTR
+ fputc('#', f);
+ print_name(f, nam);
+ fputc('{', f);
+ for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) {
+ if (i) {
+ fputc(',', f);
+ }
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + i], d, quoted, subst, st);
+ }
+ fputc('}', f);
+}
+
+fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth, u8 quoted, u32 subst, PrintState *st) {
switch (term_tag(term)) {
case NAM: {
// Print stuck variable as just the name
@@ -46,12 +285,37 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
}
case DRY: {
// Print stuck application as f(x,y)
- print_app(f, term, depth);
+ print_app(f, term, depth, quoted, subst, st);
break;
}
case VAR: {
- // Unresolved variable (should have been substituted to NAM by snf)
- fputs("_", f);
+ if (quoted) {
+ u32 idx = term_val(term);
+ u32 bind = 0;
+ if (idx >= depth) {
+ bind = alo_subst_get(subst, idx - depth);
+ }
+ if (bind != 0) {
+ Term val = HEAP[bind];
+ if (term_sub(val)) {
+ val = term_unmark(val);
+ print_term_at(f, val, depth, 0, 0, st);
+ } else {
+ print_term_at(f, term_new_var(bind), depth, 0, 0, st);
+ }
+ } else {
+ u32 nam = depth > idx ? depth - idx : 0;
+ print_alpha_name(f, nam, 'a');
+ }
+ } else {
+ u32 loc = term_val(term);
+ if (loc != 0 && term_sub(HEAP[loc])) {
+ print_term_at(f, term_unmark(HEAP[loc]), depth, 0, 0, st);
+ } else {
+ u32 nam = print_state_get_lam(st, loc, 0);
+ print_lam_name(f, st, nam);
+ }
+ }
break;
}
case NUM: {
@@ -78,21 +342,64 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
}
case CO0:
case CO1: {
- // Unresolved copy reference (unscoped variable)
- fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "_₀" : "_₁", f);
+ if (quoted) {
+ u32 idx = term_val(term);
+ u32 bind = 0;
+ if (idx >= depth) {
+ bind = alo_subst_get(subst, idx - depth);
+ }
+ if (bind != 0) {
+ Term val = HEAP[bind];
+ if (term_sub(val)) {
+ val = term_unmark(val);
+ print_term_at(f, val, depth, 0, 0, st);
+ } else {
+ u8 tag = term_tag(term);
+ u32 lab = term_ext(term);
+ print_term_at(f, term_new(0, tag, lab, bind), depth, 0, 0, st);
+ }
+ } else {
+ u32 nam = depth > idx ? depth - idx : 0;
+ if (nam == 0) {
+ fputc('_', f);
+ } else {
+ print_alpha_name(f, nam, 'A');
+ }
+ fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
+ }
+ } else {
+ u32 loc = term_val(term);
+ if (loc != 0 && term_sub(HEAP[loc])) {
+ print_term_at(f, term_unmark(HEAP[loc]), depth, 0, 0, st);
+ } else {
+ u32 nam = print_state_get_dup(st, loc, term_ext(term));
+ print_dup_name(f, nam);
+ fputs(term_tag(term) == CO0 ? "₀" : "₁", f);
+ }
+ }
break;
}
case LAM: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
- u32 nam = depth + 1;
fputs("λ", f);
- print_name(f, nam);
- fputc('.', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth + 1);
+ if (quoted) {
+ print_alpha_name(f, depth + 1, 'a');
+ fputc('.', f);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc], depth + 1, 1, subst, st);
+ } else {
+ u32 hint = 0;
+ if (st->lam_use_ext) {
+ hint = term_ext(term) + 1;
+ }
+ u32 nam = print_state_get_lam(st, loc, hint);
+ print_lam_name(f, st, nam);
+ fputc('.', f);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc], depth + 1, 0, 0, st);
+ }
break;
}
case APP: {
- print_app(f, term, depth);
+ print_app(f, term, depth, quoted, subst, st);
break;
}
case SUP: {
@@ -100,23 +407,27 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
fputc('&', f);
print_name(f, term_ext(term));
fputc('{', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(',', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc('}', f);
break;
}
case DUP: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
- u32 nam = depth + 1;
- fputc('!', f);
- print_name(f, nam);
- fputc('&', f);
- print_name(f, term_ext(term));
- fputc('=', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
- fputc(';', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth + 1);
+ if (quoted) {
+ fputc('!', f);
+ print_alpha_name(f, depth + 1, 'A');
+ fputc('&', f);
+ print_name(f, term_ext(term));
+ fputc('=', f);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, 1, subst, st);
+ fputc(';', f);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth + 1, 1, subst, st);
+ } else {
+ print_state_get_dup(st, loc, term_ext(term));
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, 0, 0, st);
+ }
break;
}
case MAT:
@@ -125,12 +436,17 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
Term cur = term;
while (term_tag(cur) == MAT || term_tag(cur) == SWI) {
u32 loc = term_val(cur);
- if (term_tag(cur) == SWI) fprintf(f, "%u", term_ext(cur));
- else print_mat_name(f, term_ext(cur));
+ if (term_tag(cur) == SWI) {
+ fprintf(f, "%u", term_ext(cur));
+ } else {
+ print_mat_name(f, term_ext(cur));
+ }
fputc(':', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
Term next = HEAP[loc + 1];
- if (term_tag(next) == MAT || term_tag(next) == SWI) fputc(';', f);
+ if (term_tag(next) == MAT || term_tag(next) == SWI) {
+ fputc(';', f);
+ }
cur = next;
}
// Handle tail: NUM(0) = empty, USE = wrapped default, other = default
@@ -138,10 +454,10 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
// empty default - just close
} else if (term_tag(cur) == USE) {
fputc(';', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(cur)], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[term_val(cur)], depth, quoted, subst, st);
} else {
fputc(';', f);
- print_term_go(f, cur, depth);
+ print_term_at(f, cur, depth, quoted, subst, st);
}
fputc('}', f);
break;
@@ -149,12 +465,12 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
case USE: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputs("λ{", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc('}', f);
break;
}
case C00 ... C16: {
- print_ctr(f, term, depth);
+ print_ctr(f, term, depth, quoted, subst, st);
break;
}
case OP2: {
@@ -165,162 +481,143 @@ fn void print_term_go(FILE *f, Term term, u32 depth) {
"~", "==", "!=", "<", "<=", ">", ">="
};
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(' ', f);
- if (opr < 17) fputs(op_syms[opr], f);
- else fprintf(f, "?%u", opr);
+ if (opr < 17) {
+ fputs(op_syms[opr], f);
+ } else {
+ fprintf(f, "?%u", opr);
+ }
fputc(' ', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(')', f);
break;
}
case DSU: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputs("&(", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputs("){", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(',', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 2], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc('}', f);
break;
}
case DDU: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputs("!(", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputs(")=", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(';', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 2], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 2], depth, quoted, subst, st);
break;
}
case ALO: {
- fputs("<ALO>", f);
+ u32 alo_loc = term_val(term);
+ u64 pair = HEAP[alo_loc];
+ u32 tm_loc = (u32)(pair & 0xFFFFFFFF);
+ u32 ls_loc = (u32)(pair >> 32);
+ fputs("@{", f);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[tm_loc], 0, 1, ls_loc, st);
+ fputc('}', f);
break;
}
case RED: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputs(" ~> ", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted, subst, st);
break;
}
case EQL: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputs(" === ", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(')', f);
break;
}
case AND: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputs(" .&. ", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(')', f);
break;
}
case OR: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputc('(', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputs(" .|. ", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted, subst, st);
fputc(')', f);
break;
}
case UNS: {
- u32 loc = term_val(term);
- // UNS body is λf.λv.actual_body - extract names from depths
- Term lam_f = HEAP[loc];
- u32 nam_f = depth + 1;
- Term lam_v = HEAP[term_val(lam_f)];
- u32 nam_v = depth + 2;
- Term body = HEAP[term_val(lam_v)];
+ u32 loc = term_val(term);
+ Term lamf = HEAP[loc];
+ u32 locf = term_val(lamf);
+ Term lamv = HEAP[locf];
+ u32 locv = term_val(lamv);
+ u32 hintf = st->lam_use_ext ? term_ext(lamf) + 1 : 0;
+ u32 hintv = st->lam_use_ext ? term_ext(lamv) + 1 : 0;
+ u32 namf = print_state_get_lam(st, locf, hintf);
+ u32 namv = print_state_get_lam(st, locv, hintv);
+ Term body = HEAP[locv];
fputs("! ", f);
- print_name(f, nam_f);
+ print_lam_name(f, st, namf);
fputs(" = λ ", f);
- print_name(f, nam_v);
+ print_lam_name(f, st, namv);
fputs(" ; ", f);
- print_term_go(f, body, depth + 2);
+ print_term_at(f, body, depth + 2, quoted, subst, st);
break;
}
case INC: {
u32 loc = term_val(term);
fputs("↑", f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], depth);
+ print_term_at(f, HEAP[loc], depth, quoted, subst, st);
break;
}
}
}
-fn void print_ctr(FILE *f, Term t, u32 d) {
- u32 nam = term_ext(t), loc = term_val(t), ari = term_tag(t) - C00;
- // Nat: count SUCs, print as Nn or Nn+x
- if (nam == NAM_ZER || nam == NAM_SUC) {
- u32 n = 0;
- while (term_tag(t) == C01 && term_ext(t) == NAM_SUC) { n++; t = HEAP[term_val(t)]; }
- fprintf(f, "%un", n);
- if (!(term_tag(t) == C00 && term_ext(t) == NAM_ZER)) { fputc('+', f); print_term_go(f, t, d); }
- return;
- }
- // Char: 'x' or 'λ'
- if (nam == NAM_CHR && ari == 1 && term_tag(HEAP[loc]) == NUM) {
- u32 c = term_val(HEAP[loc]);
- if (c >= 32 && c != 127) {
- fputc('\'', f);
- print_utf8(f, c);
- fputc('\'', f);
- return;
- }
- }
- // List/String
- if (nam == NAM_NIL || nam == NAM_CON) {
- // Check if string (non-empty, all printable chars including Unicode)
- int is_str = (nam == NAM_CON);
- for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02 && term_ext(x) == NAM_CON; x = HEAP[term_val(x)+1]) {
- Term h = HEAP[term_val(x)];
- if (!(term_tag(h) == C01 && term_ext(h) == NAM_CHR)) { is_str = 0; break; }
- if (term_tag(HEAP[term_val(h)]) != NUM) { is_str = 0; break; }
- u32 c = term_val(HEAP[term_val(h)]);
- if (c < 32 || c == 127) { is_str = 0; break; }
- }
- Term end = t;
- while (term_tag(end) == C02 && term_ext(end) == NAM_CON)
- end = HEAP[term_val(end)+1];
- if (is_str && term_tag(end) == C00 && term_ext(end) == NAM_NIL) {
- fputc('"', f);
- for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02; x = HEAP[term_val(x)+1])
- print_utf8(f, term_val(HEAP[term_val(HEAP[term_val(x)])]));
- fputc('"', f);
- return;
- }
- // Proper list: [a,b,c]
- if (term_tag(end) == C00 && term_ext(end) == NAM_NIL) {
- fputc('[', f);
- for (Term x = t; term_tag(x) == C02; x = HEAP[term_val(x)+1]) {
- if (x != t) fputc(',', f);
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[term_val(x)], d);
- }
- fputc(']', f);
- return;
- }
- // Improper list: h<>t
- if (nam == NAM_CON) {
- print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc], d); fputs("<>", f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+1], d);
- return;
+fn void print_term_finish(FILE *f, PrintState *st) {
+ while (st->dup_print < st->dup_len) {
+ u32 idx = st->dup_print++;
+ u32 loc = st->dup_locs[idx];
+ u32 lab = st->dup_labels[idx];
+ u32 nam = st->dup_names[idx];
+ fputc('!', f);
+ print_dup_name(f, nam);
+ fputc('&', f);
+ print_name(f, lab);
+ fputc('=', f);
+ Term val = HEAP[loc];
+ if (term_sub(val)) {
+ val = term_unmark(val);
}
+ print_term_at(f, val, 0, 0, 0, st);
+ fputc(';', f);
}
- // Default CTR
- fputc('#', f); print_name(f, nam); fputc('{', f);
- for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) { if (i) fputc(',', f); print_term_go(f, HEAP[loc+i], d); }
- fputc('}', f);
+}
+
+fn void print_term_ex(FILE *f, Term term, u8 lam_use_ext) {
+ PrintState st;
+ print_state_init(&st, lam_use_ext);
+ print_term_at(f, term, 0, 0, 0, &st);
+ print_term_finish(f, &st);
+ print_state_free(&st);
}
fn void print_term(Term term) {
- print_term_go(stdout, term, 0);
+ print_term_ex(stdout, term, 0);
+}
+
+fn void print_term_quoted(Term term) {
+ print_term_ex(stdout, term, 1);
}
diff --git a/clang/snf/_.c b/clang/snf/_.c
index 3710191..b3ddec8 100644
--- a/clang/snf/_.c
+++ b/clang/snf/_.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth) {
+fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth, u8 quoted) {
term = wnf(term);
u32 ari = term_arity(term);
if (ari == 0) {
@@ -7,15 +7,20 @@ fn Term snf(Term term, u32 depth) {
u64 loc = term_val(term);
if (term_tag(term) == LAM) {
Term body = HEAP[loc];
- // ^(depth+1) for stuck variable
- heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1));
- HEAP[loc] = snf(body, depth + 1);
+ if (quoted) {
+ // ^(depth+1) for stuck variable
+ heap_subst_var(loc, term_new_nam(depth + 1));
+ HEAP[loc] = snf(body, depth + 1, quoted);
+ term = term_new(0, LAM, depth, loc);
+ } else {
+ HEAP[loc] = snf(body, depth + 1, quoted);
+ }
} else if (term_tag(term) == DRY) {
- HEAP[loc + 0] = snf(HEAP[loc + 0], depth);
- HEAP[loc + 1] = snf(HEAP[loc + 1], depth);
+ HEAP[loc + 0] = snf(HEAP[loc + 0], depth, quoted);
+ HEAP[loc + 1] = snf(HEAP[loc + 1], depth, quoted);
} else {
for (u32 i = 0; i < ari; i++) {
- HEAP[loc + i] = snf(HEAP[loc + i], depth);
+ HEAP[loc + i] = snf(HEAP[loc + i], depth, quoted);
}
}
return term;
diff --git a/test/_all_.sh b/test/_all_.sh
index 834a6ec..1c54dac 100755
--- a/test/_all_.sh
+++ b/test/_all_.sh
@@ -57,10 +57,17 @@ run_tests() {
# Extract trailing // comment lines (consecutive from end of file)
expected=""
nlines=0
+ nocollapse=0
while IFS= read -r line; do
if [[ "$line" == //* ]]; then
- [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${line#//}"$'\n'"$expected"
- [ -z "$expected" ] && expected="${line#//}"
+ if [[ "$line" == '//!'* ]]; then
+ nocollapse=1
+ content="${line#//!}"
+ else
+ content="${line#//}"
+ fi
+ [ -n "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"$'\n'"$expected"
+ [ -z "$expected" ] && expected="${content}"
((nlines++))
else
break
@@ -86,13 +93,16 @@ run_tests() {
keep=$((total - nlines))
head -n "$keep" "$test_file" > "$tmp"
- # Determine flags: all tests use -C by default
- flags="-C"
- case "$name" in
- collapse_* | enum_* )
- [ -n "$collapse_count" ] && flags="${flags}${collapse_count}"
- ;;
- esac
+ # Determine flags: all tests use -C by default unless //! is used
+ flags=""
+ if [ "$nocollapse" -eq 0 ]; then
+ flags="-C"
+ case "$name" in
+ collapse_* | enum_* )
+ [ -n "$collapse_count" ] && flags="${flags}${collapse_count}"
+ ;;
+ esac
+ fi
actual="$("$bin" "$tmp" $flags 2>&1)"
diff --git a/test/unscoped_nested.hvm4 b/test/unscoped_nested.hvm4
index c56031f..9de77b9 100644
--- a/test/unscoped_nested.hvm4
+++ b/test/unscoped_nested.hvm4
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
@main = λa. !A&L=a; &L{λb. !B&L=b; &L{1, B₀}, A₁}
//λa.a
//λa.λb.1
-//λa.λb._
+//λa.λb.a
diff --git a/test/unscoped_var.hvm4 b/test/unscoped_var.hvm4
index c1aed4f..973ca57 100644
--- a/test/unscoped_var.hvm4
+++ b/test/unscoped_var.hvm4
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
// Using X₀ in position 1 of same-labeled SUP causes world mismatch
@main = λx. !X&L=x ; &L{1, X₀}
//λa.1
-//λa._
+//λa.a