Last active
December 25, 2025 20:11
-
-
Save 2dogsandanerd/2a3d54085b2daaccbb1125601945ceeb to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Enterprise RAG Core – Feature Manifest V2.55
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Note: This manifest describes a system designed for "Zero Data Loss" ingestion. It prioritizes accuracy and auditability over speed. | |
| # Enterprise RAG Core – Feature Manifest V2.55 | |
| **Version:** V2.55 (Public Release Candidate) | |
| **Status:** Production Ready / Code Verified | |
| **Summary:** A high-precision, hybrid Graph-Vector RAG platform featuring a multi-lane ingestion engine with consensus reconciliation. | |
| --- | |
| ## 1. Agent Service (The Orchestrator) | |
| *Handles query planning, decomposition, and context synthesis.* | |
| * **Query Decomposition Engine:** | |
| * **Plan-and-Solve Pattern:** Breaks complex user prompts into multi-step execution plans. | |
| * **Sub-Query Modeling:** Auto-generates dependencies (`depends_on`) between steps. | |
| * **Routing:** Dynamically routes sub-queries to Vector Search, Graph Traversal, or Mathematical Calculation tools. | |
| * **Semantic Caching (Redis + Embeddings):** | |
| * **Similarity Matching:** Caches responses based on vector similarity (>95%) rather than exact string matching. | |
| * **Performance:** ~40x latency reduction for recurring semantic queries. | |
| * **Cost Efficiency:** estimated 80% reduction in LLM token usage for high-traffic topics. | |
| * **Resilience & API:** | |
| * **Streaming Responses:** Real-time token streaming with state progress updates. | |
| * **Rate Limiting:** IP-based throttling (SlowAPI). | |
| * **Session Management:** Full conversation history with "Time-to-Live" support. | |
| ## 2. Ingest Service (The Multi-Lane Engine) | |
| *The system's USP. Instead of a single extraction method, we use parallel lanes and a consensus engine.* | |
| * **Pipeline Routing ("The Triage"):** | |
| * Analyzes incoming documents for complexity (layout, scan quality, text layer). | |
| * Routes to one or more specific processing lanes based on confidence scoring. | |
| * **Multi-Lane Architecture:** | |
| * **Lane A (Fast/LedZeppelin):** Raw text extraction via PyMuPDF. <100ms/page. | |
| * **Lane B (Smart/Goethe):** Structure-aware extraction using Docling (Tables, Headers, Markdown). | |
| * **Lane C (Vision/Hawk):** VLM-based extraction (Ollama Vision) for charts, photos, and complex layouts. | |
| * **"Solomon" Consensus Engine:** | |
| * **Parallel Execution:** Runs selected lanes concurrently. | |
| * **Reconciliation:** Compares "Ground Truth" (Text) against "Visual" (Vision) layers. | |
| * **Conflict Resolution:** Merges outputs to maximize coverage and accuracy. | |
| * **Entity Extraction:** | |
| * LLM-based extraction of 8 core entity types (Person, Org, Location, Skill, etc.) and 7 relationship types. | |
| * **JSON Schema Enforcement:** Ensures strict adherence to the Graph Schema. | |
| * **Control Room API:** | |
| * Real-time WebSocket feeds for pipeline status. | |
| * Live metrics on batch processing and lane performance. | |
| ## 3. Knowledge Service (Vector Layer) | |
| *Optimized for unstructured semantic retrieval.* | |
| * **ChromaDB Integration:** | |
| * Custom HNSW configuration for Cosine/L2 distance metrics. | |
| * Batch chunk ingestion with metadata preservation (page numbers, source refs). | |
| * **Retrieval Logic:** | |
| * **Metadata Filtering:** Pre-filtering chunks based on document ownership or attributes. | |
| * **Score Normalization:** Standardizes distance metrics to similarity scores (0-1). | |
| ## 4. Graph Service (Context Layer) | |
| *Optimized for structured relationships and "Multi-Hop" reasoning.* | |
| * **Neo4j Implementation:** | |
| * **Strict Schema:** Pre-defined ontology for Enterprise contexts (Entities: `Organization`, `Person`, `Contract`, etc.). | |
| * **Cypher Injection Protection:** Strict allow-listing of property names and relationship types. | |
| * **Graph Algorithms:** | |
| * **Traversal:** recursive retrieval of connected entities (e.g., "Who reports to X who works on Project Y?"). | |
| * **Constraint Management:** Enforced uniqueness constraints to prevent node duplication. | |
| ## 5. Shared Infrastructure & Security | |
| * **Observability Stack:** | |
| * **OpenTelemetry:** Distributed tracing across all microservices (instrumented for Jaeger). | |
| * **Prometheus/Grafana:** Metrics for request latency, LLM token usage, and cache hit rates. | |
| * **Audit Logging:** Immutable logs of every data access intent (User X viewed Document Y). | |
| * **Security:** | |
| * **RBAC:** Granular permissions (`INGEST`, `READ`, `ADMIN`, `SERVICE_INTERN`). | |
| * **Auth:** Dual-mode authentication (JWT for users, API Keys for service-to-service). | |
| * **Input Sanitization:** Protection against Path Traversal and ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service). | |
| ## 6. Tech Stack | |
| * **Core:** Python 3.11, FastAPI, Pydantic V2 | |
| * **Orchestration:** LangGraph, LangChain | |
| * **Databases:** Neo4j 5.x (Graph), ChromaDB (Vector), Redis 7 (Cache/Queue) | |
| * **AI/ML:** Ollama (Local Inference), Docling (PDF Processing), PyMuPDF | |
| * **Ops:** Docker Compose, Prometheus, OpenTelemetry | |
| --- | |
| ## Roadmap (Coming in V3.0) | |
| * **Cross-Encoder Reranking:** Re-scoring retrieval results for higher precision. | |
| * **Full Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) UI:** A frontend for manually resolving the specific edge cases flagged by the Solomon Consensus Engine. | |
| * **Distributed Tracing UI:** Full visualization of the request lifecycle in Grafana. | |
| --- | |
| ### Why this exists? | |
| Most RAG systems fail on complex PDFs or hallucinate relationships. By splitting ingestion into **"Lanes"** (Text, Vision, | |
| Layout) and having them vote on the result (**Consensus**), and then storing the data in both a **Vector DB** (for fuzzy | |
| search) and a **Knowledge Graph** (for hard facts), we achieve a much higher level of factual consistency for enterprise use | |
| cases. | |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.